Hart wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it has, in fact, been tried before. It has, in fact, always
failed. Your comments about the quality of Ben's approach are noted.
Maybe you're right. But, it's not germane
Dave,
Well, I thought I'd described how pretty well. Even why. See my recent
conversation with Dr. Heger on this list. I'll be happy to answer specific
questions based on those explanations but I'm not going to repeat them
here. Simply haven't got the time.
Although I have not been
the existing collective-psychology and
practical-economic obstacles that hold us back from creating AGI
together, and build a beneficial AGI ASAP ...
-- Ben G
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:34 AM, David Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Brad
Pei, Ben G. and Abram,
Oh, man, is this stuff GOOD! This is the real nitty-gritty of the AGI
matter. How does your approach handle counter-evidence? How does your
approach deal with insufficient evidence? (Those are rhetorical questions,
by the way -- I don't want to influence the course
Dr. Matthias Heger wrote:
Brad Pausen wrote The question I'm raising in this thread is more one of
priorities and allocation of scarce resources. Engineers and scientists
comprise only about 1% of the world's population. Is human-level NLU
worth the resources it has consumed, and will
Dr. Matthias Heger wrote:
Brad Paulson wrote More generally, as long as AGI designers and
developers insist on simulating human intelligence, they will have to
deal with the AI-complete problem of natural language understanding.
Looking for new approaches to this problem, many researches
Dr. Matthias Heger wrote:
Brad Paulson wrote Fortunately, as I argued above, we do have other
choices. We don't have to settle for human-like.
I do not see so far other choices. Chess is AI but not AGI.
Yes, I agree but IFF by AGI you mean human-level AGI. As you point out
below, a lot
David Hart wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip] Unfortunately, as long as the mainstream AGI community
continue to hang on to what should, by now, be a
thoroughly-discredited strategy, we will never (or too
Dr. Heger,
Point #3 is brilliantly stated. I couldn't have expressed it better. And
I know this because I've been trying to do so, in slightly broader terms,
for months on this list. Insofar as providing an AGI with a human-biased
sense of space and time is required to create a human-like AGI
PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bob Mottram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [agi] Let's face
it, this is just dumb. To: agi@v2.listbox.com Date: Thursday, October
2, 2008, 6:21 AM 2008/10/2 Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It boasts a 50% recognition accuracy rate
+/-5 years and an 80%
recognition
This is probably a tad off-topic, but I couldn't help myself.
From the Technology-We-Could-Probably-Do-Without files:
STEP RIGHT UP, LET THE COMPUTER LOOK AT YOUR FACE AND TELL YOU YOUR AGE
http://www.physorg.com/news141394850.html
From the article:
...age-recognition algorithms could ...
Ben wrote: I remain convinced that probability theory is a proper
foundation for uncertain inference in an AGI context, whereas Pei remains
convinced of the oppositeSo, this is really the essential issue, rather
than the particularities of the algebra...
But, please, don't stop discussing
Oops!
The William Blake poem recited in the Dangerous Knowledge BBC program was
not Infinity (that's what Cantor was so concerned about). It was
Auguries of Innocence. The passage used in the program (and the one
borrowed by Sting) was:
To see a world in a grain of sand
And a heaven in a
Recently, someone on this list (I apologize for not making a note of this
person's name) raised the question whether we might find a shortcut to
AGI. The author went on to opine that, because the problems associated
with achieving AGI had been considered by some of the world's most
brilliant
Sorry, but in my drug-addled state I gave the wrong URI for the Dangerous
Knowledge videos on YouTube. The one I gave was just to the first part of
the Cantor segment. All of the segments can be reached from the link
below. You can recreate this link by searching, in YouTube, on the key
I believe the company mentioned in this article was referenced in an active
thread here recently. They claim to have semantically enabled Wikipedia.
Their stuff is supposed to have a vocabulary 10x that of the typical
U.S. college graduate. Currently being licensed to software developers
FIRST 3-D PROCESSOR RUNS AT 1.4 GHZ ON NEW ARCHITECTURE
http://www.physorg.com/news140692629.html
PROGRAM TURNS TO ONLINE MASSES TO IMPROVE PATENTS
http://www.physorg.com/news140672870.html
Enjoy,
Brad
---
agi
Archives:
From the article:
A team of biologists and chemists [lab led by Jack Szostak, a molecular
biologist at Harvard Medical School] is closing in on bringing non-living
matter to life.
It's not as Frankensteinian as it sounds. Instead, a lab led by Jack
Szostak, a molecular biologist at Harvard
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/science/05brain.html?_r=3partner=rssnytemc=rssoref=sloginoref=sloginoref=slogin
or, indirectly,
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/05/0138237from=rss
---
agi
Archives:
Hey gang...
It’s Likely That Times Are Changing
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/35992/title/It%E2%80%99s_Likely_That_Times_Are_Changing
A century ago, mathematician Hermann Minkowski famously merged space with
time, establishing a new foundation for physics; today physicists are
Eric,
It was a real-life near-death experience (auto accident).
I'm aware of the tryptamine compound and its presence in hallucinogenic
drugs such as LSD. According to Wikipedia, it is not related to the NDE
drug of choice which is Ketamine (Ketalar or ketamine HCL -- street name
back in
EXPLORING THE FUNCTION OF SLEEP
http://www.physorg.com/news138941239.html
From the article:
Because it is universal, tightly regulated, and cannot be lost without
serious harm, Cirelli argues that sleep must have an important core
function. But what?
Terren,
OK, you hooked me. A virgin is something I haven't been called (or even
been associated with) in about forty-five years. So, I feel compelled to
defend my non-virginity at all costs. I'm 58 now. You do the math (don't
forget to subtract for the 30 years I was married). ;-) My
Mike,
So you feel that my disagreement with your proposal is sad? That's quite
an ego you have there, my friend. You asked for input and you got it. The
fact that you didn't like my input doesn't make me or the effort I spent
composing it sad. I haven't read all of the replies to your
of which I'm unaware. (Note that, e.g., shrews don't
have much play capability, but they have SOME.)
Brad Paulsen wrote:
Mike Tintner wrote: ...how would you design a play machine - a
machine that can play around as a child does?
I wouldn't. IMHO that's just another waste of time and effort
Mike Tintner wrote: ...how would you design a play machine - a machine
that can play around as a child does?
I wouldn't. IMHO that's just another waste of time and effort (unless it's
being done purely for research purposes). It's a diversion of intellectual
and financial resources that
Eric,
http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/research/rair/asc_rca/
Sorry, couldn't answer your question based on quick read.
Cheers,
Brad
Eric Burton wrote:
Does anyone know if Rensselaer Institute is still on track to crack
the Turing Test by 2009? There was a Slashdot article or two about
their
Abram,
Just FYI... When I attempted to access the Web page in your message,
http://www.learnartificialneuralnetworks.com/ (that's without the
backpropagation.html part), my virus checker, AVG, blocked the attempt
with a message similar to the following:
Threat detected!
Virus found:
(1) STUDY FINDS THAT SLEEP SELECTIVELY PRESERVES EMOTIONAL MEMORIES
http://www.physorg.com/news137908693.html
(2) BIG-BRAINED ANIMALS [BIRDS] EVOLVE FASTER
http://www.physorg.com/news138003096.html
(3) BRAIN RULES
Here's a guy selling a book/DVD (Brain Rules) about how to improve your
mental
Pieces of rat brain controls small robo platform. How's *that* for an
out-of-body experience! There's video even!!
http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19926696.100-rise-of-the-ratbrained-robots.html
Cheers,
Brad
P.S. Sorry I haven't been participating on the list that much
. It will be better at many things beneficial to humanity, it
will do those things faster and it will be able to create its own, improved,
replacement. I believe this so much that I am betting the rest of my life on it.
Cheers,
Brad
Charles Hixson wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
...
Sigh. Your point
Mike Tintner wrote:
Bob: As a roboticist I can say that a physical body resembling that of a
human isn't really all that important. You can build the most
sophisticated humanoid possible, but the problems still boil down to
how such a machine should be intelligently directed by its
as this may be, I think it's getting pretty far off-topic, so
I'll stop now.
Cheers,
Brad
Charles Hixson wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
... Nope. Wrong again. At least you're consistent. That line
actually comes from a Cheech and Chong skit (or a movie -- can't
remember which at the moment) where
Terren Suydam wrote:
Brad,
I'm not entirely certain this was directed to me, since it seems to be a
response to both things I said and things Mike Tintner said. My comments below,
where (hopefully) appropriate.
--- On Mon, 8/4/08, Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, excuse me
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Well, having an intuitive understanding of human language will be useful
for an AGI even if its architecture is profoundly nonhumanlike. And,
human language is intended to be interpreted based on social,
spatiotemporal experience. So the easiest way to make an AGI
Jiri,
I'd really like to hear more about your approach. Sounds bang-on! Have you
written a paper (or worked from papers written by others) to which you could
point us?
Cheers,
Brad
Jiri Jelinek wrote:
Ben,
My perspective on grounding is partially summarized here
Mike Tintner wrote:
Brad;We don't need no stinkin' grounding.
Your intention, I take it, is partly humorous. You are self-consciously
assuming the persona of an angry child/adolescent. How do I know that
without being grounded in real world conversations? How can you
understand the prosody
Terren Suydam wrote:
I don't know, how do you do it? :-] A human baby that grows up with virtual
reality hardware surgically implanted (never to experience anything but a
virtual reality) will have the same issues, right?
There is no difference in principle between real reality and virtual
statistics
can be.
But what really gets me cheezed-off is that Loosemore got first place! :-)
Jim Bromer wrote:
I seriously meant it to be a friendly statement. Obviously I
expressed myself poorly.
Jim Bromer
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This from
Mike,
Valentina was referring to a remark I made (and shouldn't have -- just on
general principles) about her making my *personal* kill-list thanks to the LOL
she left regarding Richard Loosemore's original reply to the post that started
this thread. I should have taken a time out before I
, there are either zero
associations or none with the potential to count as an answer.
--Abram
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
I confess, I'm not sure I understand your response. It seems to be a
variant of the critique made by three people early-on in this thread
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
All,
Here's a question for you:
What does fomlepung mean?
If your immediate (mental) response was I don't know. it means
you're not a slang-slinging Norwegian. But, how did your brain
cheerleader, she's just made my kill-list. The only thing worse than
someone who slings unsupported opinions around like they're facts, is someone
who slings someone else's unsupported opinions around like they're facts.
Who is Mark Waser?
Cheers,
Brad
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote
, if you feel that I insulted you I am quite willing to
apologize for what (from my point of view) was an accident of prose style.
Richard Loosemore
Brad Paulsen wrote:
Richard,
Someone who can throw comments like Isn't this a bit of a
no-brainer? and Keeping lists of 'things not known
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
James,
Someone ventured the *opinion* that keeping such a list of things I
don't know was nonsensical, but I have yet to see any evidence or
well-reasoned argument backing that opinion. So, it's just an
opinion. One with which I, obviously
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
All,
Here's a question for you:
What does fomlepung mean?
If your immediate (mental) response was I don't know. it means
you're not a slang-slinging Norwegian. But, how did your brain
produce that feeling of not knowing? And, how did
in our mindset.
And for the other one, it would just be a strait term match.
James Ratcliff
___
James Ratcliff - http://falazar.com
Looking for something...
--- On *Mon, 7/28/08, Brad Paulsen /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
From: Brad Paulsen [EMAIL
Valentina,
Well, the LOL is on you.
Richard failed to add anything new to the two previous responses that each
posited linguistic surface feature analysis as being responsible for generate
the feeling of not knowing with that *particular* (and, admittedly
poorly-chosen) example query. This
28, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
All,
Here's a question for you:
What does fomlepung mean?
If your immediate (mental) response was I don't know. it means you're
not
a slang-slinging Norwegian. But, how did your brain produce that feeling
of not knowing? And, how
All,
Here's a question for you:
What does fomlepung mean?
If your immediate (mental) response was I don't know. it means you're not a
slang-slinging Norwegian. But, how did your brain produce that feeling of not
knowing? And, how did it produce that feeling so fast?
Your brain may
Jim Bromer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
What does fomlepung mean?
If your immediate (mental) response was I don't know. it means you're not
a slang-slinging Norwegian. But, how did your brain produce that feeling
of not knowing
http://www.forebrain.org
http://www.charactervalues.com
http://www.charactervalues.org
http://www.charactervalues.net
- Original Message - From: Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL
All,
DUTCH RESEARCHERS TAKE FLIGHT WITH THREE-GRAM 'DRAGONFLY'
http://www.physorg.com/news135936047.html
Some may consider this a bit off-topic, but it has an undeniable way cool
factor. Be sure to watch the video (YouTube link in the article).
Come to think of it, since everything has
Ah... And just what the hell is your problem? And I mean that in the
friendliest way possible. Just what the HELL is your problem?
Brad
Jim Bromer wrote:
Brad Paulsen Said:
Mr. LaMuth,
You are correct, sir. I should not have called you a patent troll. It
was not
only harsh
Mike,
If memory serves, this thread started out as a discussion about binding in an
AGI context. At some point, the terms forward-chaining and
backward-chaining were brought up and, then, got used in a weird way (I
thought) as the discussion turned to temporal dependencies and hierarchical
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
I've been following this thread pretty much since the beginning. I
hope I didn't miss anything subtle. You'll let me know if I have, I'm
sure. ;=)
It appears the need for temporal dependencies or different levels of
reasoning has been
I've been following this thread pretty much since the beginning. I hope I
didn't miss anything subtle. You'll let me know if I have, I'm sure. ;=)
It appears the need for temporal dependencies or different levels of reasoning
has been conflated with the terms forward-chaining (FWC) and
Below is a short list of robot kits available from some on-line resellers. I
have no connection to any of the companies or Web sites mentioned nor have I
used and of the kits listed here.
All,
RESEARCH IDENTIFIES BRAIN CELLS RELATED TO FEAR
http://www.physorg.com/news134969685.html
Cheers,
Brad
---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your
WHY MUSICIANS MAKE US WEEP AND COMPUTERS DON'T
http://www.physorg.com/news134795617.html
DO WE THINK THAT MACHINES CAN THINK?
http://www.physorg.com/news134797615.html
Cheers,
Brad
---
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS
Hi Kids!
http://www.custompc.co.uk/news/602910/rumour-control-larrabee-based-on-32-original-pentium-cores.html#
Cheers,
Brad
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
YKY,
I'm not certain this applies directly to your issue, but it's an interesting
paper nonetheless: http://web.mit.edu/cocosci/Papers/nips00.ps.
Cheers,
Brad
YKY (Yan King Yin) wrote:
I'm considering nonmonotonic reasoning using Bayes net, and got stuck.
There is an example on p483 of J
I was nearly kicked out of school in seventh grade for coming up with a method
of manipulating (multiplying, dividing) large numbers in my head using what I
later learned was a shift-reduce method. It was similar to this:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/742717/human_calculator/
My seventh
Greetings Fellow Knowledge Workers...
WHEN USING GESTURES, RULES OF GRAMMAR REMAIN THE SAME
http://www.physorg.com/news134065200.html
The link title is a bit misleading. You'll see what I mean when you read it.
Enjoy,
Brad
---
agi
Archives:
Richard,
Thanks for your comments. Very interesting. I'm looking forward to reading the
introductory book by Waldrop. Thanks again!
Cheers,
Brad
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
Richard,
I think I'll get the older Waldrop book now because I want to learn
more about
Richard,
I presume this is the Waldrop Complexity book to which you referred:
Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos
M. Mitchell Waldrop, 1992, $10.20 (new, paperback) from Amazon (used
copies also available)
Or, maybe...
Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos
Roger Lewin, 2000 $10.88 (new, paperback) from Amazon (no used copies)
Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos by Roger Lewin (Paperback - Feb 15, 2000)
Brad
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Jim Bromer wrote:
From: Richard Loosemore Jim,
I'm sorry:
a lookout for the new book in 2009.
Thanks very much for the information!
Cheers,
Brad
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Brad Paulsen wrote:
Or, maybe...
Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos
Roger Lewin, 2000 $10.88 (new, paperback) from Amazon (no used copies)
Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos
Richard and Ed,
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different
results. - Albert Einstein
Prelude to insanity: unintentionally doing the same thing over and over again
and getting the same results. - Me
Cheers,
Brad
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Ed Porter wrote:
Hey Gang...
RESEARCHERS DEVELOP NEURAL IMPLANT THAT LEARNS WITH THE BRAIN
http://www.physorg.com/news133535377.html
I wonder what *that* software looks like!
Cheers,
Brad
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed:
From The More stuff we already know department...
NEW RESEARCH ON OCTOPUSES SHEDS LIGHT ON MEMORY
http://www.physorg.com/news132920831.html
Cheers,
Brad
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed:
Hear Ye, Hear Ye...
CHILDREN LEARN SMART BEHAVIORS WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT THEY KNOW
http://www.physorg.com/news132839991.html
Cheers,
Brad
And, remember: think twice, code once!
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed:
Fellow AGIers,
Every once in a while this list could use a bit of intentional humor.
Unfortunately, I think these guys are serious:
IN 2050, YOUR LOVER MAY BE A ... ROBOT
http://www.physorg.com/news132727834.html
Pacis progredior,
Brad
---
agi
If anyone is interested, I have some additional information on the C870
NVIDIA Tesla card. I'll be happy to send it to you off-list. Just
contact me directly.
Cheers,
Brad
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed:
Hi Kids!
Article summary:
http://www.physorg.com/news132290651.html
Article text:
http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-documentdoi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060138ct=1
Enjoy!
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
All,
Not specifically AGI-related, but too interesting not to pass along, so:
SWEET NOTHINGS: ARTIFICIAL VESICLES AND BACTERIAL CELLS COMMUNICATE BY WAY OF SUGAR COMPONENTS
http://www.physorg.com/news131883741.html
Cheers,
Brad
---
agi
Archives:
J Storrs Hall, PhD wrote:
Actually, the nuclear spins in the rock encode a single state of an ongoing
computation (which is conscious). Successive states occur in the rock's
counterparts in adjacent branes of the metauniverse, so that the rock is
conscious not of unfolding time, as we see
John G. Rose wrote:
From: Brad Paulsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not exactly (to start with, you can *never* be 100% sure, try though you
might :-) ). Take all of the investigations into rockness since the
dawn of homo sapiens and we still only have a 0.9995 probability that
rocks
But, without us droids, how would you verify/validate your
consciousness? And, think about what you'd be taking over. As Sting
says, What good's a world that's all used up? Rhetorical questions,
both. When I start quoting Sting lyrics, I *know* it's time for me to
get off a thread. Ta!
in the definition of that word? I smell a project!
Let's build a dictionary that contains nothing but circular
definitions. For example: definition - Of or relating to or
characteristic of defining something.
From: Brad Paulsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John wrote:
A rock is either
Richard Loosemore wrote:
Anyone at the time who knew that Isaac Newton was trying to do could
have dismissed his efforts and said Idiot! Planetary motion is simple.
Ptolemy explained it in a simple way. I use simplicity-preferring
prior, so epicycles are good enough for me.
Which is why
John wrote:
A rock is either conscious or not conscious.
Excluding the middle, are we?
I don't want to put words into Ben company's mouths, but I think what
they are trying to do with PLN is to implement a system that expressly
*includes the middle*. In theory (but not necessarily
Hey kids:
A COMPUTER THAT CAN 'READ' YOUR MIND
http://www.physorg.com/news131623779.html
Cheers,
Brad
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your
Fellow AGI-ers,
At the risk of being labeled the list's newsboy...
U.S. Plan for 'Thinking Machines' Repository
Posted by samzenpus on Wednesday May 28, @07:19PM
from the save-those-ideas-for-later dept.
An anonymous reader writes Information scientists organized by the U.S.'s
NIST say
Hi Gang!
The first Phoenix Lander pix from Mars:
http://fawkes4.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=315cID=7
Cheers,
Brad
---
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your
Hi again...
As I write this I'm watching the post-landing NASA press conference live on
NASA TV (http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html). One of the NASA
people was talking about what a difficult navigation problem they'd
successfully overcome. His analogy was, It was like golfing
John,
Yeah. And look how well that worked. It didn't.
Most people who post drivel to lists like this honestly don't think they're
posting drivel. Their ignorance runs very, very deep (in many cases to the
point of clinical self-delusion). It is as deep as their conviction that
they are
Some of you may be interesting in this WikiMining Java API:
http://www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de/software/JWPL. JWPL is the acronym for Java
WikiPedia Library.
The license isn't open source. But, it is available at no charge for
non-commercial use in research. It's from an academic project in
, May 7, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I happened to catch a program on National Geographic Channel today
entitled Accidental Genius. It was quite interesting from an AGI
standpoint.
One of the researchers profiled has invented a device that, by sending
electromagnetic
I happened to catch a program on National Geographic Channel today entitled
Accidental Genius. It was quite interesting from an AGI standpoint.
One of the researchers profiled has invented a device that, by sending
electromagnetic pulses through a person's skull to the appropriate spot in
the
Readers of these lists might enjoy the refereed paper Overview of the Panda
Programming System (http://www.jot.fm:80/issues/issue_2008_05/article1/)
described in the following abstract:
This article provides an overview of a pattern-based programming system,
named Panda, for automatic
Steve Josh,
You guys ought to get a kick out of this:
http://www.physorg.com:80/news127452360.html. We don't need no stinking
gigahertz circuits when we can have terahertz guided-wave circuits. That's
1000 times faster than gigahertz (but, of course, you know that). Based on the
terahertz
Dear Fellow AGI List Members:
Just thought I'd remind the good members of this list about some strategies for
dealing with certain types of postings.
Unfortunately, the field of AI/AGI is one of those areas where anybody with a
pulse and a brain thinks they can design a program that thinks.
What's really impressive is how natural the leg movements are. I was
flashing to images of young horses navigating rough terrain.
- Original Message -
From: Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 6:48 PM
Subject: [agi] Big Dog
Peruse
94 matches
Mail list logo
