Re: [agi] Uninterpreted RDF terms

2008-05-19 Thread YKY (Yan King Yin)
On 5/18/08, Stephen Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the others on this list following my progress, the example is from a set of essential capability descriptions that I'll use to bootstrap the skill acquisition facility of the the Texai dialog system. The subsumption-based capability matcher

Re: [agi] Uninterpreted RDF terms

2008-05-18 Thread Lukasz Stafiniak
Word Grammar comes to my mind, where when A -R- B, and A' is-a A, then you know A' -R- B' where B' is-a B. Because I want to have lattices (partial orders) in my system anyway, and because nodes of my graph-terms might be objects of any domain (they can be nested graph-terms even), they could

Re: [agi] Uninterpreted RDF terms

2008-05-17 Thread Stephen Reed
] Uninterpreted RDF terms Steve, How severe would you consider a restriction on RDF graphs that would allow at most one incoming and at most one outgoing edge with a given label, for capability descriptions? This would allow to do unification (and generalization aka. intersection) on graphs easily