Richard,
I agree with you that intelligence currently has no
classical/objective/true/formal definition.
However, I hope your opinion (given the title of the post) won't be
understood as you can take intelligence to mean whatever you want,
and since the term has no definition, all attempts
Pei Wang wrote:
Richard,
I agree with you that intelligence currently has no
classical/objective/true/formal definition.
However, I hope your opinion (given the title of the post) won't be
understood as you can take intelligence to mean whatever you want,
and since the term has no definition,
Richard,
It seems that the major difference between you and me is not on the
definition of intelligence, but on the definition of definition.
:)
Pei
On 5/21/07, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pei Wang wrote:
Richard,
I agree with you that intelligence currently has no
.listbox.com
Subject: Re: There is no definition of intelligence [WAS Re: [agi]
Intelligence vs Efficient Intelligence]
Richard,
I agree with you that intelligence currently has no
classical/objective/true/formal definition.
However, I hope your opinion (given the title of the post) won't
