to others on this
list and neither is Ed Porter :)
PPS I continue to read and enjoy most of your emails.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Loosemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August-03-08 5:13 PM
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Some statistics on Loosemore's rudeness [WAS Re: [agi
Eric Burton wrote:
I apologize: 1/16. Which, to be fair, is half as many, and somewhat
diminishes the point I was trying to make. ,_,
Eric, *please* read the whole of the post before you comment! Of the
58 matches, in all but two of the cases the word was used by someone
else and I just
This thread has been killed. Let's end this discussion please. Continue it
via private email, start another meta-list for statistical analysis of
postings on this list, or whatever ;-p
thanks!
ben
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Eric Burton wrote:
David Clark wrote:
Richard:
I was one of the first people to help you get on the AGI list years ago
and I have appreciated many of your emails but Ben’s comments below are
right on the money.
Although I don’t agree with many of the technical points made by Ed
Porter, he is obviously very
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Goodness ... I find this whole thread has gotten a bit over-the-top ...
but I guess it's at least humorous, in a perverse sort of way...
For sure: the biggest obstacle in the way of human intellect creating
superhuman AGI, is humans' emotional nature ;-p
I am not sure
I apologize: 1/16. Which, to be fair, is half as many, and somewhat
diminishes the point I was trying to make. ,_,
On 8/3/08, Eric Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David, in the spirit of scientific objectivity, I just did a search for
the word stupid in all
of the 811 messages that I have ever
