At 20:54 11.06.05 -0400, you wrote:
What is the estimated cost of Seed AI?
Dan
one person
10 hours/day
IQ 180+
very good memory (photographic memory)
high frustration-tolerance
1000-2000 $/month (To keep mind free from waste and unnecessary thought)
hardware
5000 $/year
it will take 5-10 years
My point is, from the view of a business investor who wants a likely chance of
high profits within a few years, narrow AI projects will nearly always look
better than AGI projects.
Business investors generally don't like technology risk and AGI presents a lot
of it... Because it's novel and
Alexander E. Richter wrote:
At 20:54 11.06.05 -0400, you wrote:
What is the estimated cost of Seed AI?
Dan
one person
10 hours/day
IQ 180+
very good memory (photographic memory)
high frustration-tolerance
1000-2000 $/month (To keep mind free from waste and unnecessary thought)
hardware
Investors want the most amount of return for the least amount of
investment, and little risk.
Seems funny that so many would benefit by AGI thru Health, Wealth and the
Wisdom of AGI but no one wants to fund it.
But the old axiom of build a better mouse trap and the world will beat a
path to
On Jun 12, 2005, at 2:02 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
But, your assertion that any competently articulated, competently led
AGI project should be able to fairly easily raise $5M in venture
funding is *also* based on a basket of assumptions, which you didn't
make explicit in your message!
Yes,
The design space of the future for AGI is the many specialized AGI's
running on many computers and the feedback from those being functionally
interwoven into a new and better AGI.
Dan G
From : J.Andrew Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :
Could well be...
Right now the Novamente design is a little too big to be a comfortable one-man
job even for a genius, but it's off only by a factor of 5 or so, which makes it
very plausible that a one-man-sized AGI design exists
and even NM with all its complexities could plausibly be
