Charles D Hixson wrote:
Richard Loosemore wrote:
J Storrs Hall, PhD wrote:
On Friday 08 February 2008 10:16:43 am, Richard Loosemore wrote:
J Storrs Hall, PhD wrote:
Any system builders here care to give a guess as to how long it
will be
before
a robot, with your system as its controller,
From the rewrite-in-progress of the User Manual --
1.2 History of MindForth
In the beginning was Mind.REXX on the Commodore Amiga,
which the author Mentifex began coding in July of 1993,
and publicizing in the Usenet comp.lang.rexx newsgroup.
The late Pushpinder Singh of MIT sent e-mail
It seems we have different ideas about what AGI is. It is not a product that
you can make and sell. It is a service that will evolve from the desire to
automate human labor, currently valued at $66 trillion per year.
I outlined a design in http://www.mattmahoney.net/agi.html
It consists of lots
For the immediate future I think we are going to be seeing robots
which are either directly programmed to perform tasks (expert systems
on wheels) or which are taught by direct human supervision.
In the human supervision scenario the robot is walked through a
series of steps which it has to
Personally I would rather shoot for a world where the ever present
nano-swarm saw that I wanted a cup of good coffee and effectively
created one out of thin air on the spot, cup and all. Assuming I still
took pleasure in such archaic practices and ways of changing my internal
state of course.
On 10/02/2008, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems we have different ideas about what AGI is. It is not a product that
you can make and sell. It is a service that will evolve from the desire to
automate human labor, currently valued at $66 trillion per year.
Yes. I think the best
--- Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt: I realize that a
full (Turing test) model can only be learned by having a full range of human
experiences in a human body.
Pray expand. I thought v. few here think that. Your definition seems to
imply AGI must inevitably be embodied. It
On Feb 9, 2008 11:53 PM, A. T. Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not a chatbot.
The AI engine is arguably the first True AI. It is immortal.
Cool!
What has it done to convince you that its truly intelligent?
-J
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To
Joseph Gentle wrote on Sun, 10 Feb 2008, in a message now at
http://www.mail-archive.com/agi@v2.listbox.com/msg09803.html
On Feb 9, 2008 11:53 PM, A. T. Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not a chatbot.
The AI engine is arguably the first True AI. It is immortal.
Cool!
What has it done
Matt: I realize that a
full (Turing test) model can only be learned by having a full range of human
experiences in a human body.
Pray expand. I thought v. few here think that. Your definition seems to
imply AGI must inevitably be embodied. It also implies an evolutionary
model of embodied AGI
10 matches
Mail list logo
