: [agi] Logic and Knowledge Representation
Hi,
My opinion on the most probable route to a true AI Entity is:
1. Build a better fuzzy pattern representation language with an
inference mechanism for extracting inducible information from user
inputs. Fuzziness allows the
language
Message-
From: Ben Goertzel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 9:41 AM
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Logic and Knowledge Representation
Hi,
My opinion on the most probable route to a true AI Entity is:
1. Build a better fuzzy pattern representation language
Hi.
Please understand though I am not open sourcing the project. And although I
am not certain which parts of what I am doing that are patentable if any, I
have documented the development and the partial disclosure of it so that I
am in a position to challenge anyone else who might try to
On May 7, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 09:29:51AM -0400, Ben Goertzel wrote:
If you explain to me what non-logic based reprsentation you prefer to
use to represent a particular piece of knowledge, I can almost surely
What if you don't yet know which piece of
On May 6, 2006, at 11:40 PM, John Scanlon wrote:
A typical human being's knowledge of the letter A involves
recognition of graphical representations of the symbol, memories of
its sound when spoken, procedural or muscle memory of how to speak
and write it, and memories of where it is
On 5/8/06, James Ratcliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats a real fundamental problem though. We can make an AI intelligent
without modeling the human learning process, but only to a point. If we
continue down that path, just working on the intelligence aspect seperate
from human experiences,
.
From: sanjay padmane
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:31
PMTo: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Logic and
Knowledge Representation
On 5/7/06, Gary
Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My opinion on the most
probableroute to a true AI Entity is:
1. Build
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 1:39 AM
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: [agi] Logic and Knowledge Representation
On May 7, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Gary Miller wrote:
Which is why my research has led to a pattern language that can
compress all of the synonymous thoughts into a single pattern
Is anyone interested in discussing the use of
formal logic as the foundation for knowledge representation schemes for
AI? It'sa common approach, but I think it's the wrong path.
Even if you add probability or fuzzy logic, it's still insufficient for true
intelligence.
The human brain, the
PROTECTED]
To : agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject : [agi] Logic and Knowledge Representation
Date : Sun, 7 May 2006 02:40:06 -0400
Is anyone interested in discussing the use of formal logic as the
foundation for knowledge representation schemes for AI? It's a common
approach, but I think it's the wrong
ware makes inrecognizing a word or two in the input
stream.
From: John Scanlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 2:40 AMTo:
agi@v2.listbox.comSubject: [agi] Logic and Knowledge
Representation
Is anyone interested in discussing the use of
formal logic as the foundation for
On 5/7/06, John Scanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone interested in discussing the use of formal logic as the foundation
for knowledge representation schemes for AI? It's a common approach, but I
think it's the wrong path. Even if you add probability or fuzzy logic, it's
still
On 5/7/06, Gary Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My
opinion on the most probableroute to a true AI Entity
is:
1. Build
a better fuzzy pattern representation language with an inference mechanism for
extracting inducible information from user inputs. Fuzziness allows
the
language to
On 5/7/06, sanjay padmane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/7/06, Pei Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AI
doesn't necessarily follow the same path as how human intelligence is
produced, even though it is indeed the only path that has been proved
to work so far.
IMO, if a machine achieves true
.
Mark
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From:
Gary Miller
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 9:07 AM
Subject: RE: [agi] Logic and Knowledge
Representation
John said: The human brain, the only
high-level intelligent system
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 09:29:51AM -0400, Ben Goertzel wrote:
However, this does not imply that in an AI, these things cannot be
done using explicit logic operations.
It's possible to build anything from NAND gates. But in practice,
there are usually other constraints to implementation.
John Scanlon wrote:
Is anyone interested in discussing the use of formal logic as the
foundation for knowledge representation schemes for AI? It's a common
approach, but I think it's the wrong path. Even if you add
probability or fuzzy logic, it's still insufficient for true intelligence.
.listbox.com
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 9:07 AM
Subject: RE: [agi] Logic and Knowledge
Representation
John said: The human brain, the only
high-level intelligent system currently known, uses language and logic for
abstract reasoning, but these are based on, and owe
On May 7, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Gary Miller wrote:
Which is why my research has led to a pattern language that can
compress all of the synonymous thoughts into a single pattern.
The obvious question is how do you deal with the problem of the
synonymity of patterns being context sensitive? In
19 matches
Mail list logo
