tions/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt
> >
> > I can make more changes once I have a better understanding of the
> > concern :-)
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Med
> >
> > > -Message d'origine-
> > > De : Amanda Baber
Hi Dave, all,
I'm just writing to note that we put this fix in place last week, after a note
from Warren:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Mon Jan 15 22:02:40 2024, dcroc...@bbiw.net wrote:
> On 1/15/2024 1:32 PM, RFC Err
ld indeed be useful.
> --
> Regards,
> Dhananjay
>
> From: Amanda Baber via RT
> Date: Thursday, 14 December 2023 at 5:49 AM
> To: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org
> Cc: war...@kumari.net , sstu...@google.com
> , Rex Fernando (rex) ,
> j...@juniper.net , grow@ietf.org ,
> D
Hi all,
Should this errata report be listed as an additional reference for the "L Flag"
registration in the "BMP Peer Flags for Peer Types 0 through 2" registry? See
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bmp-parameters
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Mon Dec 1
Hi all,
We've added a reference to this errata report to the "AN_join_registrar"
registration:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/grasp-parameters
thanks,
Amanda
On Sun Nov 26 15:25:41 2023, mcr+i...@sandelman.ca wrote:
>
> Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> > Thi
Dear Carsten Bormann, Jaime Jimenez, and Christian Amsüss (cc: ace WG),
This is a reminder that if we don't receive an approval from one of the experts
by tomorrow, we'll have to mark this document "IANA NOT OK" and request a
DISCUSS for Thursday's telechat.
thanks,
Amanda
Hi Francesca and Carsten,
This is a reminder that if we don't receive an expert approval by tomorrow,
we'll have to mark this document "IANA NOT OK."
thanks,
Amanda
On Tue Nov 28 17:57:10 2023, david.dong wrote:
> Hi Francesca and Carsten,
>
> Following up again on this; could you let us know
_join_registrar"?
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Thu Nov 09 16:55:26 2023, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> The following errata report has been verified for RFC8995,
> "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)".
>
>
Hi Mahesh, Jernej, all,
We've repaired lines 191 and 213:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters
Thank you!
If any other issues come up, you can reach us at i...@iana.org, which is
heavily monitored.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Wed Nov 15 22:09:20 2023
ally meant to encompass non-RFC
documentation (see Section 4 of RFC 8126 for registration procedure
definitions), but no problem at all with including it.
Thanks,
Amanda
On 8/24/23, 9:18 AM, "iesg on behalf of Mario Loffredo" wrote:
Hi Amanda,
Il 23/08/2023 19:51, Ama
Regarding the use of a brief description in the registry itself as the
"Specification" in "Specification Required": I missed it this time, but we ran
into this same question with draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-21, and FWIW, Barry
Leiba recommended to the author that the registration procedure be
ld
> pick the smallest available value."
>
> Thanks you,
> --Bruno
>
> >
>
> Orange Restricted
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Amanda Baber via RT
> > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 4:12 AM
> > To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET
ds,
> --Bruno, on behalf of authors
>
>
> Orange Restricted
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 5:58 AM
> Cc: james.n.guich...@futurewei.com; yingzhen.i...@gmail.com; DECRAENE
> Bruno INNOV/NET ; acee.i...@gmail.com;
>
Hi Hannes,
We received your JWT review. Thank you! Were you signing off on these as well?
thanks,
Amanda
On Wed Apr 12 05:43:54 2023, amanda.baber wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> Can you check this one before Thursday? (We've also sent a separate
> JWT request to you and John.)
>
> thanks,
> Amanda
>
Hi Lars,
About this registration modification question (see [AB]):
--
DISCUSS:
--
# GEN AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14
CC
Hi Hannes,
Can you also check this JWT registration before Thursday? John's an author, so
we would need a review from you.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14#name-jwt-confirmation-methods-re
thanks,
Amanda
On Mon Apr 10 20:08:07 2023, david.dong wrote:
> Dear John
Hi Justin,
Can you review this OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Metadata request before
Thursday?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14#name-oauth-dynamic-client-regist
thanks,
Amanda
On Mon Apr 10 20:08:46 2023, david.dong wrote:
> Dear Justin,
>
> Hello. Have you
Hi Hannes,
Can you check this one before Thursday? (We've also sent a separate JWT request
to you and John.)
thanks,
Amanda
On Mon Apr 10 20:07:14 2023, david.dong wrote:
> Dear Hannes,
>
> Hello. Have you had a chance to review these proposed registrations?
>
> The due date is Wednesday
Hi Michael,
Apologies for the late reply.
> > The IANA Considerations section needs to include the "Domain Name
> > Reservation Considerations" sub-section described in Section 5 of RFC
> > 6761 (we’ve failed to ask for this in recent years).
>
> Hi, thanks for the suggestion!
>
> Subject:
Hi Ken,
This works for us. I'll go ahead and change the IANA review state in the
Datatracker to "IANA OK - Actions Needed."
thanks,
Amanda
On Thu Mar 30 23:33:10 2023, kvau...@trevilon.com wrote:
> I believe this version of the document addresses all concerns. The
> approach taken to reference
Hi Hannes,
Have you had a chance to review the OAuth Extensions Error registration in this
document? It's on next week's telechat agenda.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge/
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Tue Mar 28 16:21:32 2023
P: 0421 058 554 | T : Teams
> Chat<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/chat/0.0?users=scott.lutwy...@des.qld.gov.au>
> E:
> scott.lutwy...@des.qld.gov.au<mailto:april.gunningda...@resources.qld.gov.au>
> 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park 4102, GPO Box 2454 BRISBANE Qld 4001
>
> __
Hi Rich, Yoav, Noah,
Does version -12 require a new review? This was updated today and is on the
telechat tomorrow:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-12
thanks,
Amanda
On Thu Jan 19 16:26:39 2023, rs...@akamai.com wrote:
> > At this point, I don't think so. We
Hi,
Does this errata report need to be listed as an additional reference for the
id-ad-rpkiNotify registration? See
https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Wed Feb 08 17:32:05 2023, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> The following err
th-parameters/oauth-
> > parameters.xhtml#extensions-error
> >
> > Name:
> > Usage Location:
> > Protocol Extension:
> > Change Controller:
> > Reference:
> >
> > I assume that this is the result of a copy-and-paste error that got
> >
Hi Tim (cc: opsawg WG),
It looks like there have been a number of updates to this document in version
-10 (you would've reviewed -09). Does this need another review?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10
This is on Thursday's IESG telechat agenda. If
ions-error
> >
> > Name:
> > Usage Location:
> > Protocol Extension:
> > Change Controller:
> > Reference:
> >
> > I assume that this is the result of a copy-and-paste error that got
> > unnoticed.
> > I suspect the authors can quickly fix this glitc
Hi Hannes (cc: oauth wg),
Have you had a chance to review the registrations for this document? This is
listed on the IESG telechat agenda for the 15th.
thanks,
Amanda
On Thu Nov 17 18:09:19 2022, sabrina.tanamal wrote:
> Hi Hannes (cc: oauth wg),
>
> As the designated expert for the OAuth
,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Thu Nov 03 11:18:03 2022, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> The following errata report has been verified for RFC7854,
> "BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)".
>
> --
> You may review the report below
could put that state and someone will follow up and I guess the draft
> will be in revised ID needed until that issue is resolved.
>
> My 2 cents.
>
> Marc.
>
> > Le 20 oct. 2022 à 19:14, Amanda Baber via RT > rev...@iana.org> a écrit :
> >
> &g
rt of the registry:
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/bundle/bundle.xhtml#admin-record-
> types
>
> We need a document that a) creates the field and b) populates it for
> existing entries so that we can list it as an additional reference for
> the registry itself. Can that b
,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
___
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
n't need full consensus to perform the registration now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...
below.
On Thu Oct 06 15:31:00 2022, benoit.cla...@huawei.com wrote:
> Hi Amanda, IPFIX IE doctors,
>
> See inline.
>
> On 9/30/2022 4:58 AM, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> > Hi Benoit, all,
> >
> >> Dear IPFIX doctors, (IANA),
> >>
> >> We wou
n't need full consensus to perform the registration now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...
bly easier once we’ve switched from XML- to database-based registries.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
e IPFIX
> Collector.
> An IPFIX Exporter will export what he sees, regardless of the semantic
> or an IANA registry. The IPFIX Collector will report a potential
> problem
> if the observed value is not in the IANA registry (bug, IANA entry
> hijacked, another convention => if value not observed, I'll send an
> error code instead, etc)
>
> Bottom line: we have two different ways to model the srhFlagsIPv6 and
> srhSegmentEndpointBehavior in IANA, with or without an IPFIX
> subregistry.
> Can you share your views on the best way to register those IEs.
>
> Thanks and regards, Benoit
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...@ietf.org
> Subject: [core-parameters] [IA
Hi John,
See [AB] below.
--On Friday, September 23, 2022 19:25 + Amanda Baber
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IANA uses the term "registry group" to refer to top-level
> registries and "registry" to describe a set of registrations
Type Digest Algorithms" is the name of a registry group that
consists solely of a registry called "Digest Algorithms."
We'll address this in more detail in 8126bis. RFC 8126, which mostly uses the
word "grouping" -- "group" was recommended by the RFC Editor -- ment
If the document hasn't been approved for publication by July, we'll contact you
about renewing for another year.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Tue Sep 13 20:11:54 2022, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> IANA,
>
> Please add the AC-Bit as documented in Section 13.3 to
Hi John,
As the AD for this document, can you approve this early allocation request?
Document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-07#section-13.3
Registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospfv3-parameters
thanks,
Amanda
On Tue Sep 13 20:11:54 2022,
now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...@ietf.org
> Subject: [core-parameters] [IA
Matt, Justin, Carsten,
I’m sending a reminder for this expert review request. Can you get back to us
about these registry updates before Thursday’s IESG telechat? If you believe
only one expert approval is necessary, let us know.
Thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
From: Amanda
by Wednesday (the day before next week's IESG telechat).
Unless you prefer otherwise, we'll wait for all three of you to respond.
If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make
the updates at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/cose
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations
now already.
>
> Regards
> Esko
>
> -Original Message-
> From: core-parameters On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 02:27
> Cc: jaime.jime...@ericsson.com; c...@tzi.org; core-paramet...@ietf.org
> Subject: [core-parameters] [IA
Hi Carsten, Jaime (cc: anima),
Can you approve the Resource Type (rt=) Link Target Attribute Values
registrations in version -11 of this document?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy
thanks,
Amanda
On Thu Apr 07 21:44:01 2022, sabrina.tanamal wrote:
>
/assignments/yang-parameters
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
___
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
-nsf-monitoring-data-model-18]
> >
> > Name: ietf-i2nsf-monitoring-interface
> > Maintained by IANA: N
> > Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:ietf-i2nsf-monitoring-interface
> > Prefix: i2nsfmi
> > Reference: [RFC-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-18]
> >
Registration Procedure(s): IETF Review
Reference: [RFC7285][RFC Errata 6876]
Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private Use (see
[RFC7285], Section 10.8.2).
The "priv:" registration has been removed from each registry.
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On
' are
reserved for Private Use (see RFC 7285, Section 10.8.2)" to the top of each
registry?
We'll need Martin to sign off on any registry changes.
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Thu May 12 22:09:51 2022, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> The following errata report has be
Hi,
We’ve changed “LISP LCAF Type” to “LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) Types”
in the registry:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/lisp-parameters
If you notice any other issues, please drop us a line at
i...@iana.org<mailto:i...@iana.org>.
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations M
Hi,
The registry was created for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-22, at which point
the registry was called “LISP LCAF Type.” It looks like we need to update the
name of the registry to match the published RFC.
Thanks,
Amanda
From: iesg on behalf of "Alberto
should have more sophisticated options, but we don't have an ETA
for this.)
Would it be useful for us to label the EAP-FAST links "Moved to [URL]." rather
than "See [URL]"?
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Thu Mar 31 19:58:19 2022, al...@deplo
escription' field, it seems correct to also remove the reference to
> > RFC8094 from the ‘reference’ field for consistency. Could that change
> > please be made?
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Sara.
> > >
> > >>> Service
Dear Authors,
This is a reminder that we need a reply to the message below.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Sat Apr 02 01:06:51 2022, amanda.baber wrote:
> Dear Authors:
>
> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED
>
> We've completed the r
Hi Michael,
This update is complete:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Mon Apr 04 01:19:34 2022, m...@mnot.net wrote:
> Yes.
>
>
> > On 2 Apr 2022, at 2:03 pm, Amanda Baber via RT
> > w
Hi Mark,
As the designated expert for the Well-Known URIs registry, can you approve this
addition?
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Fri Apr 01 13:44:21 2022, mcr+i...@sandelman.ca wrote:
>
> Dear IANA,
>
> In the brski entry in .well-known at:
>
> >
ocument in the registries when the RFC
Editor notifies us that they've assigned an RFC number.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
. If
verification of what it specifies is required, the registration procedure needs
to be changed to Specification Required. In the meantime, I’ll change this
document’s IANA review state to “IANA Not OK.”
Thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
From: iesg on behalf of Ben Schwartz
Date
Hi Tim (CC to the i2nsf WG),
Version -20 of this document is on next Thursday's IESG telechat agenda. It
looks like you would've reviewed version -16. Is this still OK?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/
thanks,
Amanda
On Fri Dec 17 15:51:48 2021,
ddress
to check whether there are any issues with receiving mail from our ticketing
system.
thanks,
Amanda
> Gesendet: Montag, 24. Januar 2022 um 23:59 Uhr
> Von: "Amanda Baber via RT"
> An: Kein Empfänger
> Cc: r...@cert.org, oauth-ext-rev...@ietf.org,
> hannes.tschofe..
t need Hannes to sign-off. We should get this added.
>
> Amanda, please complete the registration.
>
> - Warren
>
> Warren Parad
>
> Founder, CTO
> Secure your user data with IAM authorization as a service. Implement
> Authress <https://authress.io/>.
>
>
ering it
> > for
> > usage "authorization response", as proposed in the draft, but the
> > original
> > registration for use "authorization request" by RFC 9191 should
> > remain.
> >
> > -- Mike
> >
> > P.S. No, I'm not a designa
ering it
> > for
> > usage "authorization response", as proposed in the draft, but the
> > original
> > registration for use "authorization request" by RFC 9191 should
> > remain.
> >
> > -- Mike
> >
> > P.S. No, I'm not a designa
,
Amanda
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:46 PM Amanda Baber via RT <
> drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dick,
> >
> > Should we wait for further approvals or proceed with the
> > registration? The
> > document has been approved b
/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
thanks,
Amanda
On Tue Jan 04 13:21:14 2022, rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hannes,
>
> Can you please take a look at this request to allow us to make progress
> with this document?
>
> Thanks,
> Rifaat
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022
ANA registry update.
> ᐧ
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:19 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
> wrote:
>
> > Mike, Nat, John, Dick,
> >
> > Can you please take a look at this to allow us to make progress with this
> > document?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rifaat
Hi Hannes,
Have you had a chance to review the OAuth Parameters request in this document?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Wed Nov 24 21:28:18 2021, amanda.baber wrote:
> Attn: Hannes (OAuth Parameters regis
Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata
registry experts)
Have you had a chance to review the request in this document?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
Is approval from all four experts required?
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA
Dear Authors,
Is there anything you'd like us to send back to the XML reviewers at this
point? If you have any questions you'd like us to forward, just let us know.
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Fri Dec 17 18:41:40 2021, amanda.baber wrote:
> Dear Authors,
>
>
Hi Hannes,
Have you had a chance to review the OAuth Parameters request in this document?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Wed Nov 24 21:28:18 2021, amanda.baber wrote:
> Attn: Hannes (OAuth Parameters regis
Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata
registry experts)
Have you had a chance to review the request in this document?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
Is approval from all four experts required?
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA
Hi Tim and Martin (cc: i2nsf WG),
Have you had a chance to review the XML registration in this document?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model/
thanks,
Amanda
On Tue Nov 30 21:38:22 2021, michelle.cotton wrote:
> Dear Tim and Martin,
> (cc to i2nsf WG)
>
Hi Hannes,
Have you had a chance to review the OAuth Parameters request in this document?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
Is approval from all four experts required?
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Wed Nov 24 21:28:18 2021, amanda.baber wrote
Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata
registry experts)
Have you had a chance to review this request?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
Is approval from all four experts required?
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
Attn: Hannes (OAuth Parameters registry expert)
I'm resending a review request for a document that's listed on the next IESG
telechat. Can you get to this before 12/2?
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Tue Nov 16 21:17:59 2021, michelle.cotton wrote:
> Mailing List/Expert Rev
Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata registry
experts)
I'm resending a review request for a document that's listed on the next IESG
telechat. Can you get to this before 12/2?
Please let us know if approval from all four experts is required.
thanks,
Amanda
Dear JSON Web Token Claims registry experts,
Resending this request with the jwt-reg-rev...@ietf.org mailing list in copy.
Can you look at this one before the 12/2 IESG telechat?
If we can consider this approved without hearing from all four experts, please
let us know.
thanks,
Amanda Baber
Dear Richard,
I'm resending the review request below. Can you look at this one before the
IESG telechat on 12/2?
thanks,
Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager
On Tue Nov 16 17:54:43 2021, michelle.cotton wrote:
> Dear Richard,
>
> As the designated expert for the ACME Validatio
Hi,
The RR TYPE experts do want us to leave those obsoleted references in the
registry). We’re asking them to clarify whether this should be the case for all
future entries in that registry as well.
Best regards,
Amanda
From: iesg on behalf of Donald Eastlake
Date: Wednesday, September 29,
- registered 2021-04-19, expires
2022-04-19) [draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-02]
Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs
If the document hasn't been approved for publication by March, we'll contact
you then about renewing.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services
-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding]
Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
On Wed Jul 08 08:53:07 2020, ppse...@cisco.com wrote:
> Amanda,
>
> On 07/07/2020 22:54, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> > Peter, should we go
Peter, should we go ahead?
thanks,
Amanda
On Tue Jul 07 20:14:48 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> Gunter is on vacation...
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On 7/6/20, 1:14 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT"
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ketan, Peter,
>
> I believe we're waiting for G
If the document hasn't been approved by the IESG by May 2021, we'll contact you
about renewing for another year.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
On Tue Jul 07 14:32:17 2020, t...@cs.fau.de wrote:
> Dear IANA
>
> In followup to subject early allocatio
agreement to assign bit 0x0010 for
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for draft-ietf-lsr-
> dynamic-flooding?
>
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53
> To: Acee Lindem (ace
Hi Peter, all,
> > For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration is
> > described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this may
> > have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation
> > procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication for
> >
@ietf.org>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> >> mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>;
> >> gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com
> >> <mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>;
> >> alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com <mailto:alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com>
> >> Subj
I approve.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
>
> On July 1, 2020 at 5:11:01 PM, Amanda Baber via RT (iana-prot-
> pa...@iana.org)
> wrote:
>
>
> Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the B-
> bit in
> the LLS Type 1 Extended Opti
send an expert review request from
that ticket.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> Hi Ketan, IANA, Alvaro,
> I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and TLV
> - pretty straight forward.
Hi Loa, all,
A note about this:
> Yeah - you are requesting code points from registries where the
> registration procedures are "Expert Review". But those are not early
> allocation, they are permanent.
There is a kind of hybrid early allocation/Expert Review procedure for the
IS-IS Exert
, and Purge fields for the TLV Codepoint
registrations?
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
On Mon Jun 01 19:46:54 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> Hi IANA, Martin,
>
> We’ve discussed this draft and are going forward with the early
> allocation request. While t
https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers
If the document hasn't been approved for publication by next January, we'll
contact you about asking the IESG to approve an additional renewal.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
On Wed Jan 22 22:56:09 2020, t...@cs.fau.de wrote
for a document's IANA Considerations section to remain
in place upon publication even if there are no actions, if the authors strongly
prefer to remove it, we do not object.
If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible.
Thank you,
Amanda Baber
IANA Services Specialist
(END IANA
S 1.3" and "Recommended" fields
be added to the IANA Considerations section.
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
On Wed Oct 03 16:28:46 2018, rs...@akamai.com wrote:
> Yoav and I (two of the three designated experts) approve the
> assignment of 26 for TLS-LTS.
Dear Bernhard,
Thank you for catching this. The typo has been corrected:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/rdap-json-values
Best regards,
Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
On Wed Feb 14 12:34:22 2018, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
> On 23 January 2018 at 20:32, Amanda Baber via RT
Hi all,
We've made the following early allocation in the BGP-LS NLRI-Types registry:
1101Link-Overload TLV (TEMPORARY - registered 2017-12-20, expires
2018-12-20)[draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload]
Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-ls-parameters
Since this allocation and
Hi Acee, Peter,
Acee replied:
> >Is the first registry, "OSPF Extended Link TLVs Registry," meant to refer
> >to "OSPFv2 Extended Link Opaque LSA TLVs" or "OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV
> >Sub-TLVs"? In the first of those, values 4, 5, and 11 are available. In
> >the second, values 4 and 5 are not
even more confusion than before, we just
> need to sort out who is getting what ;-)
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: OSPF <ospf-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Amanda Baber via RT
> <iana-prot-param-comm...@iana.org>
sk the designated experts to
confirm that this is OK. Can you confirm that this is the correct registry?
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-ls-parameters
You can see a list of registries here:
https://www.iana.org/protocols
thanks,
Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist
On Thu Dec 14 08:
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
