they
> should deny to do so for this as well, for the same reason they had for the
> LS last year. (TLDR: burden of maintenance is to high).
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:10 AM João Paulo Silva de Souza <
> joao.paul...@hotmail.com > wrote:
>
>> Seems like I wrongly
until VSCode &
friends are all fully integrated into it.
On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 11:10:14 PM UTC-3, João Paulo Silva de Souza
wrote:
>
> Seems like I wrongly opened an issue instead of posting here first ->
> https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/issues/
What exactly are those effects that could pose issues? Nested macro blocks
inside of another macro? Ambiguous syntax due to macro usage?
IMO Tree-Sitter will be at least as correct as current RegExp syntaxes,
while being faster, with the upside of potentially turning out much better.
The worst
> What are you proposing?
>
> On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 10:10:14 PM UTC-4, João Paulo Silva de
> Souza wrote:
>>
>> Seems like I wrongly opened an issue instead of posting here first ->
>> https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/issues/8917.
>>
>>
Seems like I wrongly opened an issue instead of posting here first ->
https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/issues/8917.
My reasoning is that this is not a language feature and thus I thought I
could skip the proposal process. My apologies.
