Source: specutils
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: specutils
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: ndcube
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: tea-cli
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: tea-cli
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: ngspetsc
Version: 0.0~git20240318.f83b50a-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: ngspetsc
Version: 0.0~git20240318.f83b50a-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: ngspetsc
Version: 0.0~git20240318.f83b50a-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Hi Andrew,
Release team member hat on
On 18-05-2024 12:28 p.m., Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
In reality, i386 should probably have been dropped early (or at the last
minute) for bookworm; some libraries will be kept for compatibility
but it's not realistic to maintain i386 for the whole of the
Hi
On 17-05-2024 9:58 p.m., Victor Gamper wrote:
Is it correct that debian 13 is planned to be released without
an i386 iso and i386 is planned to be deprecated?
Our current position is described here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/12/msg3.html
Paul
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Zhang,
(CC Dandan as loong64 porter)
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:03:42 + Simon McVittie wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 01:28:43 +, Zhang Na wrote:
> Add loongarch64 support, thanks!
Thanks, have you successfully tested this? Does it successfully test
Hi Jonas,
On 16-05-2024 10:35 a.m., Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Just to clarify, the package in question does not directly depend on
rust-ahash 0.8.9-2, that Built-Using information is (as is the general
purpose of that field, I believe) transitive.
Built-Using is used for license compliance so
Hi Ben (and all the rest),
On 15-05-2024 9:56 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
Apologies for leaving this bug for so long.
NP, part of live I guess.
Is this bug still occurring?
I don't know. The problem was severe enough for us to abandon the idea
of running the backport kernels on our arm64
Hi Ben (and all the rest),
On 15-05-2024 9:56 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
Apologies for leaving this bug for so long.
NP, part of live I guess.
Is this bug still occurring?
I don't know. The problem was severe enough for us to abandon the idea
of running the backport kernels on our arm64
Hi Ben (and all the rest),
On 15-05-2024 9:56 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
Apologies for leaving this bug for so long.
NP, part of live I guess.
Is this bug still occurring?
I don't know. The problem was severe enough for us to abandon the idea
of running the backport kernels on our arm64
Control: reassign -1 autopkgtest
Hi Mathias,
Sorry for letting this go unanswered for so long.
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:39:12 + Mathias Gibbens
wrote:
I suspect debci is either adding options or directly generating a
sources.list that is injected into the container. The word "debug"
Source: nbd
Version: 1:3.25-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.26.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: nbd
Version: 1:3.25-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.26.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Lucas,
[Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the bug]
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:09:56 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Do you have any idea why we don't see the same failure on
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Lucas,
[Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the bug]
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:09:56 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Do you have any idea why we don't see the same failure on
Source: prettytable
Version: 3.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.6.0-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066757
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: prettytable
Version: 3.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.6.0-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066757
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: sqlmodel
Version: 0.0.8-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0.8-6
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066771
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: sqlmodel
Version: 0.0.8-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0.8-6
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066771
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: audit
Version: 1:3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.1.2-2.1
X-Debbugs-CC: vor...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070327
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Source: audit
Version: 1:3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.1.2-2.1
X-Debbugs-CC: vor...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070327
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Source: eclib
Version: 20231212-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20240408-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1069515
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: eclib
Version: 20231212-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20240408-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1069515
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: praat
Version: 6.4.05+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release
Source: praat
Version: 6.4.05+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release
Source: ukui-power-manager
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0.0.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070426
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: ukui-power-manager
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0.0.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070426
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: ruby-parslet
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: ruby-parslet
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: ruby-parslet
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: q2-feature-table
Version: 2023.9.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2024.2.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: q2-feature-table
Version: 2023.9.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2024.2.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: tiktoken
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.6.0-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: tiktoken
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.6.0-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: click
Version: 0.5.0-10
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.5.2-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: click
Version: 0.5.0-10
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.5.2-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On 06-04-2024 9:58 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Anyways, it looks like we could just lower the timeout to 1 second and
hope were fine for some time to come.
No. 1 second is *too short* for the PodmanRunner.test_copy_timeout test
on salsa. So I'll just disable
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On 06-04-2024 9:58 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Anyways, it looks like we could just lower the timeout to 1 second and
hope were fine for some time to come.
No. 1 second is *too short* for the PodmanRunner.test_copy_timeout test
on salsa. So I'll just disable
Source: libcbor
Version: 0.10.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.2-1.2
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: libcbor
Version: 0.10.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.2-1.2
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: wsdd
Version: 2:0.7.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2:0.7.1-5
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: wsdd
Version: 2:0.7.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2:0.7.1-5
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: snapraid
Version: 12.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 12.3-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: snapraid
Version: 12.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 12.3-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: camelot-py
Version: 0.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.11.0-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1063891
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: camelot-py
Version: 0.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.11.0-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1063891
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: unattended-upgrades
Version: 2.9.1+nmu4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.10
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: unattended-upgrades
Version: 2.9.1+nmu4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.10
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: multiqc
Version: 1.14+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.18+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: multiqc
Version: 1.14+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.18+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Hi
On 08-05-2024 10:27 p.m., Eduardo Rolim wrote:
After the upgrade, the system no longer recognizes Portuguese accents,
rendering typing of accents impossible.
Might this be related to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2024/msg00094.html
If so, updating glib2.0 with the
Hi,
On 08-05-2024 6:06 p.m., Bill Allombert wrote:
Agreed, but gap does not actually breaks anything, it is just the tests
in testing that are broken. So I can do that but that seems a bit artificial.
Aha, that wasn't at all clear to me. If you don't want to do the
artificial thing (which is
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
is not a regression.
Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on
libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on
libpng16-16-udeb. The later
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
is not a regression.
Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on
libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on
libpng16-16-udeb. The later
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
is not a regression.
Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on
libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on
libpng16-16-udeb. The later
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
is not a regression.
Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on
libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on
libpng16-16-udeb. The later
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 5:55 p.m., plugwash wrote:
Can you figure out what is going wrong and either fix it or override the tests?
As noted on IRC, it's unclear what caused this. I retriggered the test
and it's now picked up.
For those watching, britney2 would have done this by itself too after
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 5:55 p.m., plugwash wrote:
Can you figure out what is going wrong and either fix it or override the tests?
As noted on IRC, it's unclear what caused this. I retriggered the test
and it's now picked up.
For those watching, britney2 would have done this by itself too after
Hi,
On 05-05-2024 8:04 p.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
167s autopkgtest [09:50:25]: test test-dm-writeboost.sh:
[---
168s II: Checking for 14G available disk space...SKIP
How much disk space is used already by the time you get to this test?
The root of the testbed has 25
Hi Luca,
On 05-05-2024 10:04 p.m., Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Hence, I intend to apply these changes in the next src:systemd upload
> to unstable, probably next week.
In case anybody is aware of packages/programs needing an update to cope
with these changes, or any other issue, please let me know
Hi Luca,
On 05-05-2024 10:04 p.m., Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Hence, I intend to apply these changes in the next src:systemd upload
> to unstable, probably next week.
In case anybody is aware of packages/programs needing an update to cope
with these changes, or any other issue, please let me know
Hi Luca,
On 05-05-2024 10:04 p.m., Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Hence, I intend to apply these changes in the next src:systemd upload
> to unstable, probably next week.
In case anybody is aware of packages/programs needing an update to cope
with these changes, or any other issue, please let me know
Control: reassign -1 src:tracker
Control: found -1 3.4.2-3
Control: affects -1 src:sqlite3
Hi László,
On 05-05-2024 11:24 a.m., László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
It's the tracker autopkg testing that needs fixing.
So, I'm inclined to agree with your assessment, so let's reassign this
to
Control: reassign -1 src:tracker
Control: found -1 3.4.2-3
Control: affects -1 src:sqlite3
Hi László,
On 05-05-2024 11:24 a.m., László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
It's the tracker autopkg testing that needs fixing.
So, I'm inclined to agree with your assessment, so let's reassign this
to
Source: intel-vc-intrinsics
Version: 0.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't
Source: intel-vc-intrinsics
Version: 0.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't
Source: mac-widgets
Version: 0.10.0+svn416-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: mac-widgets
Version: 0.10.0+svn416-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: mac-widgets
Version: 0.10.0+svn416-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: vagrant
Version: 2.3.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: vagrant
Version: 2.3.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: vagrant
Version: 2.3.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: gnome-snapshot
Version: 46~beta-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: gnome-snapshot
Version: 46~beta-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: rapiddisk
Version: 9.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it recently started
failing in unstable and testing. Can you please investigate the
situation and fix it? I copied
Source: rapiddisk
Version: 9.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it recently started
failing in unstable and testing. Can you please investigate the
situation and fix it? I copied
Source: diffoscope
Version: 259
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: diffoscope
Version: 259
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: diffoscope
Version: 259
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Hi
On 04-05-2024 3:36 p.m., Holger Wansing wrote:
I think Bastian's approach is, to remove kbd-chooser from the archive, since
it was stated (see below) that it's no longer in use.
It might be that udd assumes all packages that build a udeb are used.
d-i has switched away from it to
Hi
On 04-05-2024 3:36 p.m., Holger Wansing wrote:
I think Bastian's approach is, to remove kbd-chooser from the archive, since
it was stated (see below) that it's no longer in use.
It might be that udd assumes all packages that build a udeb are used.
d-i has switched away from it to
Hi,
On 04-05-2024 11:39 a.m., Jerome BENOIT wrote:
What would be the best way to unblock the migration of gap and gap-io ?
If gap isn't going to change (which might be the easiest solution), then
file bugs and fix those reverse dependencies. Those bugs are RC and in
due time will cause
clone 1035474 -1
block 1035474 by -1
reassign -1 xorg-dev
retitle -1 xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev
found -1 1:7.7+23
thanks
On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:50:16 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:28:02AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti
clone 1035474 -1
block 1035474 by -1
reassign -1 xorg-dev
retitle -1 xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev
found -1 1:7.7+23
thanks
On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:50:16 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:28:02AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti
clone 1035474 -1
block 1035474 by -1
reassign -1 xorg-dev
retitle -1 xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev
found -1 1:7.7+23
thanks
On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:50:16 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:28:02AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 19:03:07 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Can you please elaborate? I'm not seeing anything serious in this bug
report.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:42:34 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> kbd-chooser is no longer in use, I think.
> Or am I
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 19:03:07 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Can you please elaborate? I'm not seeing anything serious in this bug
report.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:42:34 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> kbd-chooser is no longer in use, I think.
> Or am I
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 19:03:07 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Can you please elaborate? I'm not seeing anything serious in this bug
report.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:42:34 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> kbd-chooser is no longer in use, I think.
> Or am I
Hi,
On 30-04-2024 8:54 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Can you point me to the code that evaluates dpkg's Testsuite-Triggers to
schedule these tests? Maybe it's possible to convert dpkg's Testsuite
field to a (hardcoded) list of additional triggers ...
I think you mean this:
Hi,
On 30-04-2024 8:54 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Can you point me to the code that evaluates dpkg's Testsuite-Triggers to
schedule these tests? Maybe it's possible to convert dpkg's Testsuite
field to a (hardcoded) list of additional triggers ...
I think you mean this:
Hi,
On 30-04-2024 12:43 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-dkms
Right. I was talking about Testsuite-Triggers in the sources file
generated by dpkg. Unfortunately the automation one gets with autodep8
doesn't extend that far and the triggers you are interested in are
Hi,
On 30-04-2024 12:43 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-dkms
Right. I was talking about Testsuite-Triggers in the sources file
generated by dpkg. Unfortunately the automation one gets with autodep8
doesn't extend that far and the triggers you are interested in are
Hi Andreas,
On 29-04-2024 10:52 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
These failures could show up as autopkgtest failures in bookworm-pu.
Are they flagged somewhere in your tooling s.t. they don't go unnoticed?
As I hinted at in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069600#25, once
Hi Andreas,
On 29-04-2024 10:52 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
These failures could show up as autopkgtest failures in bookworm-pu.
Are they flagged somewhere in your tooling s.t. they don't go unnoticed?
As I hinted at in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069600#25, once
Hi,
On 27-04-2024 7:52 p.m., Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
Can you please look at libproxy<->glib-networking? libproxy excuses show
glib-networking tests failing, but they are working in sid.
And that's not missing a versioned Depends and/or Breaks? I.e. this is a
test only failure?
Paul
101 - 200 of 19934 matches
Mail list logo