Re: Supporting RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named Searches (Filters))

On 9/19/2016 11:26 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch <step...@rename-it.nl> wrote: >> On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >>> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named >>> Sear

Re: [libreoffice-users] 5.2 64bit DEB will not allow paper size selection

On 9/17/2016 2:06 PM, wrote: > On 09/17/2016 03:30 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >> Le 16/09/2016 à 21:43, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster a écrit : >>> Today, I was working on a 11x17 inch tabloid paper poster. I am using >>> Ubuntu 16.04 MATE 64bit running

Re: Panic: file auth-request.c

On 9/17/2016 2:15 PM, Chris Wik wrote: > So we upgraded to a new CentOS 7 server with SSD RAID, fast CPUs and > tons of RAM. No more load problems. We compiled the latest dovecot > from source (as the version from CentOS yum repo is already quite > old, figure we might as well run

Re: Supporting RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named Searches (Filters))

On 10/1/2014 3:21 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 10/1/2014 2:42 PM, Jesus Cea wrote: >> I wonder if Dovecot supports RFC 5466 (IMAP4 Extension for Named >> Searches (Filters)) or if there is any plan about it. > I have a partial implementation in my patch queue. I haven't

Re: [libreoffice-users] 5.2 64bit DEB will not allow paper size selection

This is an OLD bug of mine... inherited from OpenOffice: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65205 On 9/16/2016 3:43 PM, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote: > Today, I was working on a 11x17 inch tabloid paper poster. I am using > Ubuntu 16.04 MATE

Re: Bug: Shared Mailbox - Case Sensitivity

On 9/16/2016 6:53 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 16.09.2016 12:54, Leander Schäfer wrote: >> user=Leander@MyDomain.LocalDomain eilrwts >> ^^ Doesn't work > Hi! Did you know you can use %Lu instead of %u to force lowercasing? In my opinion this should be the default...

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] OT: Duplicate messages from list

On 9/16/2016 7:08 AM, William Spratt wrote: > For the record we have an exchange server and I'm only getting one copy of > each e-mail. Exchange can do de-duplication, which could explain why you aren't seeing them... ___

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] OT: Duplicate messages from list

On 9/15/2016 11:19 PM, Andrew J. Buehler wrote: > I also receive mail via IMAP, albeit through Thunderbird, so there's a > chance it may be IMAP-related somehow; do any of the people who have > reported (offlist, thus far) that they don't see the problem use IMAP? I use

Re: dovecot-keywords and mbox

On 9/15/2016 1:59 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > With Maildir++ it is possible to store list of IMAP message keyworkds > (tags in Thunderbird) on server in dovecot-keywords file. > > Is it possible the same with mbox mailboxes? > > My mbox directory contains

Re: odd load patterns - SOLVED

On 9/14/2016 10:14 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Well, I found out where all that load was coming from. > > Looks like a recent Thunderbird update reset its config to "keep all > messages for this account on this computer" - for all accounts The first time this fiasco

Re: [Assp-user] [OT] Extreme slow on bigger emails

On 9/13/2016 2:09 PM, K Post wrote: > For clarification, the issue I see is with multi-megabyte files (12MB+) > being unacceptably slow and google giving up on us with TLS on. We're on a > 100megabit per second line. Without TLS I see 15megabyte emails from gmail > come

Re: [Assp-user] Extreme slow on bigger emails

On 9/12/2016 2:17 PM, James Moe wrote: > On 09/12/2016 07:55 AM, K Post wrote: >> Gmail's max message size is 25mb I believe. At around 15mb things become >> > mb = milli-bit. Not very large. > b = bit, or bar > B = byte > Perhaps you meant MB = mega-byte? The

Re: [Mailman-Users] Digest formatting--clickable TOC?

On 9/2/2016 6:39 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 09/02/2016 02:00 PM, Andrew Hodgson wrote: >> >> I requested a similar feature a while ago: >> >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2014-December/078192.html > > > And my responses at >

Re: alterMIME

On 8/24/2016 4:33 AM, Alex JOST wrote: > Am 23.08.2016 um 14:29 schrieb Lucius Rizzo: > >> I cannot praise Barracuda enough. Its absolutely necessary if you run a >> busy MTA these days and have not given up control to Office365,Google :) > > I have seen Barracudas

Re: virtual users, mailer daemon send mails to non existant recipient and dovecot store it

On 8/24/2016 8:08 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > 2. Don't accept mail from domains that you control that don't originate > from your smtp server(s) > > Problem solved. Oops, that should of course read: 2. Don't accept mail that is both TO & FROM a (the

Re: Sub addressing delimiters

On 8/23/2016 4:42 PM, Kurt Fitzner wrote: > There is a disconnect between the way Postfix handles > recipient_delimiter and the way Dovecot handles it. For Postfix, it is > a set of delimiters that can each individually be used to separate the > address from the . In

Re: virtual users, mailer daemon send mails to non existant recipient and dovecot store it

On 8/23/2016 11:57 AM, Sam wrote: > The problem is that the sender of the spam as something like > voicem...@ourdomain.fr ( the user voicemail doesn't exist in our database ) > > And sometimes dovecot create the directory and store the reply 's mail... 1. Don't accept mail

Re: [gentoo-user] 2 MTA at the same host

On 8/8/2016 1:16 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > A better solution still would likely be figuring out why 2 MTAs are necessary > and figure out how to configure a single MTA to handle the role of both, if > at > all possible. And with Postfix's muli instance support it would be

Re: [k-9-mail] OAUTH2 support (for gmail)

nts I've had and submit a > new PR later this week. > > Philip > > On August 8, 2016 8:20:15 PM GMT+01:00, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> > wrote: >> Sorry, should have looked first... >> >> Ok, so, XOAUTH2 support was offered as a patch back in 2013...

Re: [k-9-mail] OAUTH2 support (for gmail)

Sorry, should have looked first... Ok, so, XOAUTH2 support was offered as a patch back in 2013... any reason it was never accepted? On 8/8/2016 3:16 PM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > Hello, > > This is becoming more and more problematic for me... > > I

[k-9-mail] OAUTH2 support (for gmail)

Hello, This is becoming more and more problematic for me... Is OAUTH2 support even remotely close to being implemented? If not, I guess I have to look elsewhere for an email client that supports it, until it is implemented (this is the only real problem I've ever had with K-9 Mail)... Thanks

Re: [SOGo] vacation message goes to spam

On 8/2/2016 7:57 PM, Fernando Salas [Novanet] (fsalas@novanet.network) wrote: > But Hotmail still send the autoresponse message to the spam folder, here is > the header I got from Hotmail a few minutes ago, any Idea? Thanks a lot: I'm far from understanding the buts and bolts of

Re: [SOGo] vacation message goes to spam

On 7/26/2016 3:46 PM, Fernando Salas wrote: > As you can see the variable "Return-Path" is empty and I think this is > the reason why Gmail send it to spam folder. Wrong - the null sender is required for vacation messages, this is by design, to avoid endless loops. Your

Re: an e-mail client for dovecot ?

Please do NOT send to me directly, I am on the list. Anyone who wishes direct responses should say so by setting explicit Reply-To. On 7/19/2016 11:42 AM, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > On 18/07/16 11:46, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> >> >> Op 16-7-2016 om 18:12 schreef Charles

Re: Migrate Dovecot email archive

On 6/20/2016 3:13 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Marco Usai wrote: > >> Yesterday I'vemigrated Dovecot mail archive between two servers using the >> procedure below: >> 1) Createon the new

Re: Mail dates

On 6/17/2016 1:51 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > The issue is that the files currently in the milder have the correct > time stamps, but Dovecot reports them to the IMAP clients as having a > different time and date. Maybe - or maybe not... Different clients perceive the dates

Re: Mail dates

On 6/17/2016 1:51 PM, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > On Jun 15, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: >> On 6/15/2016 12:30 PM, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: >>> The original emails were in box files, so that was not the

Re: OT: dnsbl.sorbs.net - help explaining to Mozilla list maintainers why outright blocking is bad

On 6/17/2016 10:05 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: > [mozilla.org using SORBS as a veto] > > Looks like they disabled SORBS. > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1280451#c5 Yes, thankfully he reconsidered after I begged... Thanks,

OT: dnsbl.sorbs.net - help explaining to Mozilla list maintainers why outright blocking is bad

Hello, I've been experiencing and on/off again problem with my shared dreamhost account IP block getting listed by SORBS. The only reason I know this is because apparently the Mozilla list maintainers have configured all of the Mozilla discussion lists to outright BLOCK based on being listed by

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On 6/16/2016 7:45 AM, <<to...@tuxteam.de> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 07:26:37AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 6/15/2016 4:23 PM, Rodary Jacques <roda...@free.fr> wrote: >>> Mozilla isn't free >> What a ridiculous claim this has always been by debia

Re: Mailing-list configuration

My last reply to the spammer aka 'Nicolas George'... On 6/16/2016 5:28 AM, Nicolas George wrote: > With that in mind, you realize that the reply-to-list feature is bad UI > design: No, but I did take a minute to test and discovered my MUA of choice (Thunderbird) does have a bug

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On 6/15/2016 4:23 PM, Rodary Jacques wrote: > Not using any MUA, just a browser (Opera, which is BTW in the official > Debian list: https://wiki.debian.org/WebBrowsers, non-free but I don't > know why as it is a Mozilla clone; Mozilla isn't free What a ridiculous claim this has

Re: Mail dates

On 6/15/2016 12:30 PM, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: >> On 6/14/2016 6:50 PM, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: >>> Where exactly does dovecot get the date that it reports via IM

Re: Mail dates

On 6/14/2016 6:50 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > Where exactly does dovecot get the date that it reports via IMAP? This is a problem with how you restored the files. On a linux system, you should use something like rsync -a to preserve the original date/times...

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On 6/13/2016 12:36 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > Let me try to re-state it one more time another way: > > A is annoyed by unwanted CCs and wants to make it stop. > > Solution 1: ask every people who reply to A, i.e. people who do not care > about the unwanted CCs, to make a

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On 6/13/2016 11:42 AM, John Hasler wrote: > "Reply to List" needs to be enabled in the mailing list software. Not precisely right - mailing list software only needs to add the appropriate list headers defined by the relevant RFCs. This list does (and so Reply-To-List works

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On 6/13/2016 11:12 AM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le sextidi 26 prairial, an CCXXIV, Tanstaafl a écrit : >> This is why Reply-To-List is the way to reply when engaged in a mailing >> list. >> >> If your client doesn't have this, then maybe it is time

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On 6/13/2016 5:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote: > Nobody can be expected to remember the personal preferences of each > mailing-list member, This is why Reply-To-List is the way to reply when engaged in a mailing list. If your client doesn't have this, then maybe it is time to

Re: Multiple recipient delimiter support?

On 6/6/2016 2:24 AM, Tom Sommer wrote: > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/972c9172e9e6a0fc6053efb3d2ee9d354b67727f So, for non programmers, this is you're way of saying yes, the patch was committed to core code? Thanks

Re: Multiple recipient delimiter support?

On 6/2/2016 3:50 PM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 6/2/2016 10:35 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: >> Trying to find out if dovecot supports the use of multiple recipient >> delimiters, as postfix does, but can't find a

Re: [libreoffice-users] undo functionality

On 6/1/2016 3:16 PM, B.S. wrote: > Bo Siltberg schreef op 01-06-2016 19:46: >> If you lose work because of limited undo then there is something wrong >> with your method of working. >> Anyhow, go into *Options -> LibreOffice -> Memory* and raise the *Undo >> number of steps*.

Re: [libreoffice-users] Question About Trojan Detection

On 6/3/2016 11:13 AM, Joel Madero wrote: > It'd be great if you inform McAfee about this - they consistently seem > to have issues with over aggressive detections that mislead users. Not to mention the fact that it misses lots of real threats. Anyone who uses Mcafee or

Re: Multiple recipient delimiter support?

On 6/2/2016 10:35 AM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > Trying to find out if dovecot supports the use of multiple recipient > delimiters, as postfix does, but can't find an answer... The reason this is important is simple. I've encountered a lot of sites that refu

Multiple recipient delimiter support?

Trying to find out if dovecot supports the use of multiple recipient delimiters, as postfix does, but can't find an answer... The wiki only mentions it in two meaningful places (that I can find)... With respect to postfix: /wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix The above seems to imply that for

Re: ot: migrating TB user's email to new laptop

On 5/25/2016 5:15 AM, Paolo wrote: > Start TB on the new laptop > Close it > You have created the default folder/settings in the local %appdata% folder > > copy the %appdata%\Thunderbird folder from the old laptop to the new No need for step 1. Just copy the folder from

Re: remapping return-path ?

On 5/19/2016 1:50 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > We have a situation where some party is harvesting our employees' > mailbox names and using them for a directed brute force attack against > our SMTP servers. In order dodge this we have undertaken to rename of > user

Re: [libreoffice-users] on Recovery

On 5/10/2016 4:12 PM, Xen <l...@xenhideout.nl> wrote: > Tanstaafl schreef op 10-05-2016 21:45: >> Please post the bug number for the enhancement request you have filed >> to change the recovery system. > You know very well that I have not filed a bug report, or you w

Re: [libreoffice-users] on Recovery

Please post the bug number for the enhancement request you have filed to change the recovery system. On 5/5/2016 9:00 AM, Xen wrote: > One year ago Calligra had a feature (and probably still has) of > presenting a same kind of recovery dialog to the user. > > I couldn't

Re: [libreoffice-users] do screenshots survive?

On 4/3/2016 8:09 PM, marianne-x wrote: > I am aware that attachments are stripped from posts; what about embedded > images? They do not, and I personally think this causes major problems when you are trying to explain issues. But, it is a security decision, but as long

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

On 3/14/2016 9:51 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > My "Fix it" comment was aimed at LibreOffice in general, not to you > specifically. Oh, so you prefer to issue 'general purpose' commands and edicts rather than ones aimed at spoecific people. How very thoughtful. > You are

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

On 3/11/2016 6:22 PM, Larry Gusaas <larry.gus...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2016-03-11, 4:11 PM Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas <larry.gus...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice >>>

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice > on Macs with your code change. *I* broke it? Sorry Larry I'm just a user like you. > It

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

Why is this thread in the tdf-discuss list? On 3/11/2016 3:28 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > Proof??? JRE works with 5.0 and doesn't work with 5.1. That is pretty > objective proof. > LibreOffice code changed and now does not find JRE on OS X. > > In case you weren't

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

On 3/11/2016 12:51 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2016-03-11, 4:18 AM Alexander Thurgood wrote: >> Le 11/03/2016 01:47, Larry Gusaas a écrit : >>> LibreOffice 5.1.1 on Macs still doesn't recognize Java Runtime >>> Environment (JRE 1.8.0_73 & OS X ver.10.11.3) >>> >>> You

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

PLONK On 3/3/2016 1:12 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > Thank you taking the time to repeatedly note the level of my intelligence. > > Regretfully, It has not resulted in any clear and/or concise explanations. > > No why, no when and no how. > > My apologies to others on

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

Will never, ever happen, because it is a STUPID IDEA. Sorry, been trying to not be so rude, but, well, sometimes there is no other way. OF course, I am wrong - there is one way something like that might actually ever be attempted - if you write it yourself. I'd say good luck, but it isn't a

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 3/3/2016 12:10 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > 1. Make secured e-mails without trusting the the server. Security ends > where trust starts. So, learn how to use encryption (PGP) end to end. That is the only way to ensure secure email. The problem you'll have is

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 3/3/2016 10:18 AM, Davis, Felmon wrote: > On Mar 3, 2016 7:19 AM, "James Knott" wrote: >> You should be able to configure your IMAP client to download messages >> for "offline" mode. There is also an archive function. > yeah, like I said, got to do

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 3/2/2016 4:00 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > On 3/2/2016 2:17 PM, toki wrote: >> Can you please rephrase that. >> If you literally mean what you wrote, then please study both the POP and >> IMAP protocol specifications, before making any suggestions as to what >> should

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

Neither of which relate to serverless mail synchronization of local mail stores. On 3/2/2016 1:17 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > Ok, I don't know what Data Replication is. > Please see > http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/definition/database-replication > > I don't

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 3/2/2016 11:32 AM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > We're talking POP and Thunderbird. And like I said, POP simply isn't designed for such usage. > IMAP is a pre-existing condition. No idea what you mean by that. > The ability for POP clients to keep all of their shared

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

Oh - not to mention that it doesn't even accomplish the goal. What about all of the email prior to adding 'Thunderbird 3' to the mix? Or your new phone? As I said, IMAP is the only sane, rational solution. On 2/29/2016 10:23 PM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: > Possi

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

Possible? Sure, anything is possible, but this is way too breakable to even give serious consideration to. On 2/29/2016 3:10 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > Each e-mail address has its own "STATUS" file. > "STATUS" file e-mails are not deletable from the POP mail server

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 2/29/2016 12:57 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > While I do plead ignorance about mail servers, software resident on the > users machine can do what it wants. To a point, yes... > Since PGP already exists in Thunderbird, a server is not required for > updating. What

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 2/29/2016 11:18 AM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > The unique possibility to SyncPOP instead of IMAP is an interesting > proposal. No, it isn't... assuming that by 'SyncPOP' you mean the broken POP feature where you can 'leave messages on the server'. If that isn't what

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 2/29/2016 11:04 AM, Paul D. Mirowsky <p_mirow...@bentaxna.com> wrote: > On 2/27/2016 5:38 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Lotus SmartSuite was am integrated mail server/groupware solution. >> >> You're comparing apples and oranges. > You are correct again. But t

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO?

On 2/29/2016 4:31 AM, toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/02/2016 19:06, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Not sure what kind of real world scenario that falls into > That real world scenario is adhering to a lawyer's recommendation that > even de facto spam has to be retrieved a

[Mailman-Users] Config dump? - WAS Re: speed up mailman

On 2/28/2016 1:19 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > If that doesn't make it obvious what you need to do, you might want to > tell us something about your configuration and use case. What version > of Mailman? Did you install as a package from a distribution or from > source?

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 2/28/2016 1:58 PM, Ken Springer <snowsh...@q.com> wrote: > On 2/28/16 9:40 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 2/28/2016 11:21 AM, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster >> <webmas...@krackedpress.com> wrote: >>> The only thing about Thunderbird, for me right now, was the &qu

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 2/28/2016 11:21 AM, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote: > The only thing about Thunderbird, for me right now, was the "chore" it > was to to switch systems when the one it was on, since 2010, is now down > for repairs. That is simple - you just copy the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

On 2/28/2016 9:09 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > I'm not really sure what the "conservative" recommendation. Ext4 (or > even ext3) is the obvious one, but both zfs and btrfs have > checksumming of all data written to disk which is a huge data security > improvement. That is a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

On 2/28/2016 4:24 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:51:13 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> I recall a list conversation about this, explaining that it would be >>>> trivial for someone who knows how to do ebuilds, to have their

Re: [libreoffice-users] Sidebar Survey

On 2/28/2016 5:44 AM, Dave Barton wrote: > For those who do not subscribe to the design mailing list, or follow the > project's design blog, Wasn't aware of either... Links? -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

On 2/26/2016 1:14 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote: >> I recall a list conversation about this, explaining that it would be >> trivial for someone who knows how to do ebuild

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 2/27/2016 2:10 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > One of the things I miss about Lotus SmartSuite is its' TeamMail function. A quick google suggests this is nothing more than Shared Mailbox functionality. That is Server functionality, TB is a mail client. > It also

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO?

On 2/27/2016 12:57 PM, toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/02/2016 02:05, Tanstaafl wrote: > >>> whereas Thunderbird chokes up and dies under the same conditions. >> >> Please do not spread FUD. This is blatantly false. > Really? Yes. > Can T

OT - Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 2/27/2016 7:06 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Reliability aside (I really don't trust OL and I've got lot of backing > experience to support that), I've yet to find a feature in OL that TB is > missing (apart integration with Exchange). Actually, Outlook was designed first

OT - Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

On 2/26/2016 8:49 PM, toki wrote: > From my POV, for TDF to write a new email client would be a waste of > effort. +1 > A couple of issues with TDF adoption of Thunderbird are: > > * What will TDF policy on breaking extensions be? > I have no idea if it was TB, or the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO?

On 2/26/2016 2:29 PM, toki wrote: > Probably the biggest difference between Outlook and Thunderbird, is that > the former will reliably retrieve email, regardless of the number of > accounts, or quantity of email in each account, Really? I know more than a dozen people

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: beegfs goes opensource!

On 2/26/2016 12:04 PM, James wrote: > Excellent point about the license. Did the license stop zfs folks > from enjoying zfs? I know the zfs license stops some commercial folks > from deploy/using zfs. And zfs is not a routine choice in the installation > docs for

Re: [gentoo-user] beegfs goes opensource!

On 2/25/2016 5:03 PM, James wrote: > Long awaited. > > This smoking hot (many HPC scientist agree) distributed file > system will surely rock the cluster, container and Hi Performance > Computing worlds. [1] Now if I were only smart enough to get this > puppy into

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

umbrella before this should be considered. On 2/26/2016 10:32 AM, Daniel Espinosa <eso...@gmail.com> wrote: > May should be renamed to LibreOffice Mail. > > El feb. 26, 2016 9:04 AM, "Tanstaafl" <tansta...@libertytrek.org > <mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org>

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

I think bringing Thunderbird fully under the umbrella of The Document Foundation, and as a sister project of LibreOffice, is a fantastic idea, it just makes the most sense to me as a formal and permanent home for Thunderbird going forward. The fact is, in spite of the fact that Thunderbird

Re: [k-9-mail] Attachment Received as winmail.dat Instead of PDF

On 2/17/2016 3:13 PM, Tom Booth <999tombo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tanstaafl - GREAT piece! Many thanks, you brought my issue to a > conclusion after hours of headscratching. Thankyou. You're welcome... :) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the K-9 Mai

Re: [SOGo] event categories are not synchronized

On 2/17/2016 1:08 PM, Chris <ch...@espacenetworks.com> wrote: > On 2/16/2016 8:37 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> So, is it possible, with some coding/enhancement to SOGo Integrator that >> SOGo could become are of/manage Calendar Categories? Or would this >> require some chan

Re: [SOGo] event categories are not synchronized

On 2/16/2016 8:12 AM, Christian Mack wrote: > Am 15.02.2016 um 14:31 schrieb Laurent Wargon: >> Hi all, >> >> With Thunderbird Lightning, event categories are not synchronized with the >> categories defined in the web interface. Yet contact categories defined in

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO5.1 on Linux - Opening Writer document takes >1hr

On 2/14/2016 5:40 AM, Patrick Dijkgraaf wrote: > Hi Pedro, > Had a look at that setting. These are the default settings on my system: > - Use Hardware acceleration: Enabled Try disabling hardware acceleration (always one of the first things I try)... -- To unsubscribe

Re: [SOGo] Centos 7. Sogo. Samba4. OpenChange.

On 2/11/2016 4:48 AM, < wrote: > I meant that https://portal.enterprisesamba.com/ does not provide free > packaged rpms anymore starting from samba4 version 4.3. Here is the quote from > the website: > > "SerNet's 4.2 packages and older versions will be maintained as >

Re: [SOGo] Centos 7. Sogo. Samba4. OpenChange.

On 2/10/2016 10:57 PM, < wrote: > For samba4, I had to use the repo and packages provided by > https://portal.enterprisesamba.com/ as I was told that the samba package > provided from the official centos 7 repository does not provide the DC > function. It installed fine and

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Add-on Signing in ESR

illa, who are the developers of Firefox. > > Daniel Wolf > > -Original Message- > From: Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Timo > Pietilä > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 12:04 AM > To: enterprise@mozilla.org > Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterpri

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: question about the best version of libreoffice - MY God is better!

On 1/28/2016 8:24 AM, Philip Rhoades <p...@pricom.com.au> wrote: > Tanstaafl, Please don't email me personally, I am a list member, and certainly don't need to see TWO of your ridiculous rants. > On 2016-01-28 00:02, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 1/27/2016 7:20 AM, Philip Rhoades &

Re: [SOGo] Why have you choosen SOGO?

On 1/27/2016 10:22 AM, Szládovics Péter wrote: > It does support EAS? Zimbra/Zentyal does. > IredMail absolutely not similar with SOGo... :) Not similar - it *uses* SOGo for the Groupware features, if you elect to use them.

Re: [SOGo] Why have you choosen SOGO?

On 1/27/2016 7:40 AM, Zhang Huangbin wrote: > >> On Jan 27, 2016, at 9:14 PM, Szládovics Péter wrote: >> >> Others? - What kind of similar alternative has same features? > > iRedMail: http://www.iredmail.org/ :) Which uses SOGo for the Groupware part...

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: question about the best version of libreoffice - MY God is better!

On 1/27/2016 7:20 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote: > You continue to misunderstand (I am not surprised) . . I am NOT > defending my "beliefs" I am saying clearly that a technical list is NOT > a place for proselytising on superstitions or politics or anything else > that does not

Re: [SOGo] V2 web interface Personnalisation

On 12/10/2015 10:43 AM, Francis Lachapelle wrote: > v2 has a three-pane horizontal layout while v3 has a vertical layout. None of > the frontends offer the possibility to switch between different layouts. Well, that sucks... I loathe the vertical layout that is the

Re: [SOGo] EAS Shared Calendars

On 11/9/2015 3:31 PM, Ian McMichael wrote: > On 09/11/15 20:20, Pol Bettinger wrote: >> Does someone have an idea what I missed? > At present you must have write access to calendars for them to be > visible via ActiveSync. Which would be fine if SOGo provided the

Re: [libreoffice-users] lost opportunity

On 11/5/2015 12:44 PM, Gabriele Ponzo wrote: > By the way, just for curiosity, what was the error returned by the > installer? This is my main complaint about this entire thread. Not once did anyone ask for specific details of what was meant by 'none of these would install, or

Re: [SOGo] everything off by one hour this week ?

On 10/20/2015 9:51 AM, Christian Mack wrote: > Am 20.10.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Per Jessen: >> For some reason, all my my calendar entries are listed one hour late, >> but only this week (43). Any ideas? > http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3344 > > Solution: >

Re: [libreoffice-users] Too many messages on this mailing list?? How to avoid being swamped ...

On 10/18/2015 6:44 PM, Brian Barker wrote: > At 15:27 17/10/2015 -0700, James E. Lang wrote: >> POP3 is a protocol that downloads the messages to you without >> leaving a copy on the server. > What gives you this mistaken impression? It isn't mistaken, it is fact.

Re: [SOGo] TB - password manager

On 10/7/2015 4:33 AM, Michal Boruvka wrote: > Hello, > should be checkbox for "Use password manager" by default checked? > Now if user change his password this checkbox is unchecked by default. No, I've never seen this checked by default, and don't think there is a

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >