On 4/11/2014 4:37 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:30:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
One of the things I do to minimize getting bit by newly released buggy
ebuilds is to wait a few days after a new update is available before
updating...
Isn't that what
Hi all,
I'm wondering if this is even feasible before I go open a
bug/enhancement request for portage for this...
One of the things I do to minimize getting bit by newly released buggy
ebuilds is to wait a few days after a new update is available before
updating...
This works well, and
Hi all,
I rarely do this (I know, I should do it periodically at least), so I'd
like someone to check these...
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
dev-python/python-exec
selected: 1.1 1.2
protected: none
omitted: none
perl-core/ExtUtils-Command
On 4/10/2014 7:21 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Everything else in that list is routine except maybe pciutils and gpm.
Add them to world manually if you use those apps
Thanks Alan/Tom...
Hmmm... what is pciutils used for? From a little googling, it seems like
it is a tool
On 3/31/2014 10:43 AM, Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to use the full path to commands in your script or set an
environment variable. In my case using full paths to executables was enough.
Bingo... thanks Daniel!
Now to figure out why one of my remote systems is sending the
Hi all,
Ok, this is really irritating me...
I have a script that simply performs some backups. The commands are like
this:
# perform tar.tgz backup of /etc
tar -czpvf $BKUP_DIR_etc/$BKUP_DateTime-dev-ecat-etc.tgz /etc
When I run this script manually, it does what it is supposed to, and the
On 3/31/2014 7:13 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:01:48 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
I have a script that simply performs some backups. The commands are
like this:
# perform tar.tgz backup of /etc
tar -czpvf $BKUP_DIR_etc/$BKUP_DateTime-dev-ecat-etc.tgz /etc
When
On 3/26/2014 9:07 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hello all,
I'd like to be able to apply a background color to some cells based on
whether or not they were modified within the last x days...
Anyone know if this is possible? I have a feeling not, but you never
know...
Guess
On 3/28/2014 7:13 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote:
Still don’t get it. My understanding is:
- Openchange and Outlook Anywhere setup should be used for Outlook 2010
- SOGo built-in ActiveSync for Outlook 2013
- SOGo built-in ActiveSync for Android and iOS devices
- IMAP/CalDav/CardDav
Hello all,
I'd like to be able to apply a background color to some cells based on
whether or not they were modified within the last x days...
Anyone know if this is possible? I have a feeling not, but you never know...
thx
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
On 3/24/2014 8:34 PM, Virgil Arrington cuyfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I would think that would take away the benefit of a master document. By
having the style controlled by one master document, you get consistent
formatting throughout. If that could be disabled, you could have
different chapters
On 3/25/2014 8:23 AM, Virgil Arrington cuyfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I suppose having options is generally a good thing, but I'd much rather
create and change formatting in one master document than have to change
and synchronize 20 or 30 subdocuments to make sure they all work
together. Is it
On 3/25/2014 8:51 AM, Virgil Arrington cuyfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I suppose people can still build spreadsheets by inserting numbers into
cells and then pulling out their pocket calculators to add up the column
of numbers (I've seen my students do that).
This is so not even remotely
On 3/23/2014 12:06 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/03/2014 12:11, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:52:47 -0500
Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
It's my sincere hope that someone's persistence hammered some common
sense and email etiquette into
On 3/21/2014 5:57 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
How does one send email to*THIS* list, without being subscribed in
the first place? A bugzilla mailing list is a different matter.
I think that is the main and primary point.
I loathe lists that allow posts from non subscribers
On 3/22/2014 5:06 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Please don't use this list for personal quarrels of any kind!
If someone says something you don't like - just ignore it/him.
If someone insults you, reply by personal mail only.
If someone says something which
On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
Why should Gentoo have a default?
Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they are reasonable and
rational.
ISTM the only good reason is that not having a default would make the
documentation a lot more complicated.
Documentation,
On 3/21/2014 7:13 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
I am on the list and don't need two copies.
Use
On 3/20/2014 5:28 PM, e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. It is a worry that 17 out of 24 features are in fact
devoted to interoperability with m$.
Nope, not a worry at all. Compatibility with the office product that
holds the vast majority of the market share is a decent objective.
On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
I am on the list and don't need two copies.
Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case, delete my
direct email manually yourself) in your email program.
On 3/20/2014 4:00 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:53:51 +0400
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenRC is default in Gentoo now, and it is my best hope it will be.
Do you have a source that backs up this claim?
Are you seriously challenging the FACT
On 3/16/2014 12:24 PM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
I don't think the OP's original question silly. I think he or she
wanted to know if LibréOffice's support for MS Office formats was
compatible with those of MS Office's.
A reasonable question, in my view.
If the question was is
On 3/16/2014 12:07 PM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
Once again: Putting the cart before the horse. LO does not define
the standard. OASIS or ISO (depending upon one's perspective, I
suppose) defines the standard. LO's responsibility is to faithfully
*implement* the standard.
As
Hi all,
I'm working on a little problem that I'd really like to resolve. It
doesn't really have anything to do with Libreoffice, other than I
thought I might be able to use Calc to do the sort...
I have a text file. Each line is one record.
I can use the raw windows Sort command to sort the
, 17 Mar 2014 14:32:15 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on a little problem that I'd really like to resolve. It
doesn't really have anything to do with Libreoffice, other than I
thought I might be able to use Calc to do the sort...
I have a text file. Each line
PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi Paul,
Actually, I *think* that will work perfectly, thanks!
If anyone cares, what this if for is...
I use a really cool little free PortableApp called 'RemoteControl'
(based on the old 'GenControl' app), that allows me to connect to and
remotely
On 3/14/2014 11:20 AM, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
I found some excellent advice from one of the moderators there.
Someone with a very familiar name!
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39t=366405sid=f6c8f025bc5fff3f5f634d2a9e4b076f
[tips hat to tanstaafi].
Just to be clear,
Hi all,
Ok, I was wondering about this.
How do I tell what version of the ODF standard any of my individual
files are?
I tried opening a spreadsheet (.ods) and checked File Properties, but
nothing in there about the PDF version...
Follow-up question would be, how do I convert the old to
On 3/12/2014 11:11 AM, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
Also wondering what the memory setting are like
Tools - Options - Memory
On most machines you can bump al those values right up. the defaults
are for very low spec machines.
I've always meant to open a bug to add an option to allow
Hi all,
I would very much like to see Inverse implement this bug.
What it is is simply to provide a way for Inverse customers (those who
have purchased block hours of support from Inverse) to vote with their
pocketbooks for new features (or bug fixes).
Details at:
On 3/11/2014 11:34 AM, Wally wnow...@gmail.com wrote:
Warning: Checking for possible rootkit strings[ Warning ]Found
string 'aion' in file '/usr/sbin/sshd'. Possible rootkit: Trojaned SSH
daemon
$ strings sshd | grep aion
Vector Permutaion AES for x86_64/SSSE3, Mike Hamburg (Stanford
On 3/10/2014 10:38 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
So, I need an SQL schema that allows for the creation of 'Groups', that the
email 'accounts' can be made members
of, that can then be queried to test if any given email user is a member of any
given group.
Hopefully that was a
Hello all,
We have a postfixadmin+mariadb sql database we have been using for many,
many years (well, only recently migrated from mysql to mariadb, and it
was totally transparent, so thanks for that!). This system is rock
solid, and we have no desire to change it.
We are in the process of
Ok, I don't understand this...
If I do an emerge -pvuDN world, it tells me I only need to update (among
a few other things) ONE version of dev-lang/python-exec: (2.0.1 to -r1).
I then tried to selectively update just the kernel, and it complains
about python-exec-2.0.1 being masked, so I add
On 3/8/2014 10:12 AM, Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
* Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org [140308 09:46]:
If I do an emerge -pvuDN world, it tells me I only need to update (among
a few other things) ONE version of dev-lang/python-exec: (2.0.1 to -r1).
I then tried to selectively
/2014 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Also, you have to manually add it (right-click in the header
Customize), I always remove the normal Reply button and add the Smart
Reply button.
Sometimes you have to actually read emails to grok their content... ;)
--
To unsubscribe e
On 3/4/2014 3:01 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
So I had the Reply Lists (or Smart Reply?) button on individual email
windows all along (whether showing all headers or not).
NO.
There is a separate 'Reply List' button.
There is a 'Smart Reply' button.
Two different buttons.
On 3/4/2014 7:37 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
I'm using Thunderbird latest rev (24.3.0) in PCLOS, and customize only
shows the usual reply stuff --reply, reply all, reply list.
Are you customizing the MAIN Menu Toolbar (at the very top), or the MAIL
HEADER Toolbar (that contains
On 3/5/2014 11:02 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Again, the 'Smart Reply' button is ONLY available in the HEADER toolbar.
And more importantly, can only be ADDED TO the EMail Header Toolbar, NOT
the main Menu toolbar up top. If you are trying to drag it to the top
one
On 3/3/2014 9:12 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
Tanstaafl, where is the smart reply button? I'm running T-Bird 24.3.0
(latest update for me) and see no such button. I have either Reply or
Reply to List, but no smart button and no preference or option for such
a button that I
On 3/4/2014 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/3/2014 9:12 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
Tanstaafl, where is the smart reply button? I'm running T-Bird 24.3.0
(latest update for me) and see no such button. I have either Reply or
Reply to List
On 3/4/2014 1:51 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
I still see no Smart Reply but in the email window itself
Like I said...
YOU HAVE TO ADD IT.
Right-click (CMD-Click on a Mac) in the email Header pane, and click
'Customize'.
Then you should be able to drag-remove the plain
On 3/2/2014 10:34 AM, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:)
Please use Reply to all when replying to mails from this mailing
list.
sigh Please do NOT do that blindly.
Why? Many reasons, but one of the best examples can be found here:
Tom - please STOP blindly clicking Reply All on every single message -
and see my next reply about your stupid advice to everyone else to do
the same stupid thing..
I do NOT need to see your messages TWICE - I'm on the list, dammit.
On 3/2/2014 4:08 PM, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/2/2014 1:53 PM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
In fact: Because some people, for some reason, feel the need to set
Reply-to to their own email address: I've a procmail rule that
resets those to the mailing list.
That is rude and arrogant and you should *never* do that.
Some
On 3/3/2014 7:56 AM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:25:36 -0500
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/2/2014 1:53 PM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
In fact: Because some people, for some reason, feel the need to set
Reply-to to their own
On 3/3/2014 9:58 AM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:46:06 -0500
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
[snip]
If you cannot see the difference then I guess we have nothing more to
discuss, because I don't (try to) discuss things with stupid people.
[snip
I'm not Jim, but probably know far more than he does about Thunderbird.
On 3/3/2014 3:14 PM, yahoo-pier_andreit pier_andr...@yahoo.it wrote:
dear jim, I'm using thunderbird, and I have the same problem, if I press
ctrlR the reply is to the sender non to the list, and I would like to
reply to
On 3/3/2014 7:30 AM, Fred Wilson fredw...@mail.ru wrote:
Please look at what technical superiority of systemd consists of and
then tell us if an ordinary user needs it. What systemd brings is
something usefull only for companies that has money to pay for high-end
servers, clusters,
On 3/3/2014 7:28 AM, Fred Wilson fredw...@mail.ru wrote:
I really don't see how 10 seconds or a minute more can hurt anyone. If
you reboot more often, then it's different. But boot time is minor
issue.
My understanding about the fast boot times argument is that it was
driven by Redhat and
On 2/28/2014 9:37 AM, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:)
I just tried out the various options (Ctrl, Alt, Shift combos) in
Excel 2010 and there really doesn't seem to be a way of dragging a
column into a new position. It seems you have to cut or copy first.
Glad you were wrong - being
On 2/27/2014 3:44 PM, Mark Bourne
libreoffice-ml.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2/27/2014 1:25 PM, Tim Deaton t...@timdeaton.org wrote:
Some time ago I created bug 39936 asking asking for an enhancement that
would work the way Excel does. Maybe some more encouragement
On 2/27/2014 12:24 PM, Dan Johansson d...@dmj.nu wrote:
On 26.02.2014 22:24, Poison BL. wrote:
When I search FHANDLE in menuconfig I get:
│ Symbol: FHANDLE [=y]
│ Type : boolean
│ Prompt: open by fhandle syscalls
│ Location:
│ (1) - General setup
│ Defined at
On 2/27/2014 2:59 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 27/02/14 21:49, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 27/02/14 19:24, Dan Johansson wrote:
On 26.02.2014 22:24, Poison BL. wrote:
When I search FHANDLE in menuconfig I get:
│ Symbol: FHANDLE [=y]
│ Type : boolean
│ Prompt:
On 2/26/2014 9:40 AM, Dries Feys dries.f...@tvh.com wrote:
I select the part of the spreadsheet I want to move. Then I click in
the middle of that area and drag the selection to the new position.
I hope my brief explanation is clear enough.
I know you can drag-n-drop cells. But you only have
On 2/26/2014 10:00 AM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote
In Calc it takes 6:
1. Right-click a row/column header,
2. Click CUT,
3. Right-click the row/column header above/to-the-right-of the
row/column you want the one you CUT to go,
4. Click 'Paste Special',
5. Change
On 2/26/2014 2:05 PM, Mark Bourne
libreoffice-ml.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Although not particularly obvious, all these options are documented in
the help - from the index, look up moving cells by drag-and-drop.
It is, and I even found that once, but it doesn't mention rows or
columns,
On 2/27/2014 1:25 PM, Tim Deaton t...@timdeaton.org wrote:
Some time ago I created bug 39936 asking asking for an enhancement that
would work the way Excel does. Maybe some more encouragement on that
issue might move it up in terms of priority.
Did you miss my request for anyone who knows how
On 2/25/2014 7:23 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2014-02-24 8:19 PM, Laz C. Peterson l...@paravis.net wrote:
It would be great to see a feature similar to Apple’s Mail
application, where clicking “Reply All” to a message sent by the user
actually opens up a new email
Hello all,
This is for those of use who to choose to roll our kernels by hand...
So, am I missing something?
Given the most recent gentoo news item:
# eselect news read 10
2014-02-25-udev-upgrade
Title Upgrade to =sys-fs/udev-210
AuthorSamuli
On 2/26/2014 3:05 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
Run make menuconfig
Press /
Type FHANDLE
Then you can see it is enabled by switching on systemd support in the
Gentoo specific options.
I did say that I know how to search - that is how I was able to find it.
But... I don't
On 2014-02-24 4:48 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
In Gentoo you need systemd, but that's a decision from the Gentoo
maintainers. They do the job, they make the choices.
Interesting. Now I have to spin off a new thread as to why this decision
was made if it isn't forced by
On 2014-02-24 1:10 PM, e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
You are unaware of the numbers of m$ fans that pollute this list
demanding that the priority of LO is not to produce high quality
native odf output,
Never ever seen anyone say anything like that...
but instead to produce perfect m$
Mick,
You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
Please trim your posts.
On 2014-02-22 6:32 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 22:06:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 22/02/2014
On 2014-02-23 12:42 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 17:25:18 Tanstaafl wrote:
You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
Please trim your posts.
Sorry for this, I wasn't
On 2014-02-22 6:25 PM, upscope upsc...@nwi.net wrote:
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 07:45:34 PM M Henri Day wrote:
2014-02-22 19:23 GMT+01:00 Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org:
Would someone please confirm this bug for 4.2.1.1 I just opened?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Tom, please do NOT CC me directly, I am on the list and certainly don't
need to see your messages twice.
On 2014-02-22 7:01 PM, Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
As the User Support mailing list for a gateway project i think it's
fairly good that we help people to learn that there are
On 2014-02-23 10:40 AM, Johnny Rosenberg gurus.knu...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't use an email client, but the Gmail web interface also hides lines
from previous posts.
Lol! Thanks for the laugh Johnny...
In case you are wondering, the funny bit is how quickly you disproved
your very first
On 2014-02-22 8:00 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, has anyone tried hackintosh in a VM? I am thinking of using AppleMac's
Mail program, when I can no longer run the legacy kmail application. A bit
drastic to have to load a whole VM just for mail, but I can't find another
client
On 2014-02-21 4:58 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:32:07 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok, so, since it really is so simple, wouldn't it be easier to
implement this as an eselect module then, as opposed to creating a
bunch of separate profiles?
profiles handle
Hi everyone,
Would someone please confirm this bug for 4.2.1.1 I just opened?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75376
Sample document exhibiting the problem is attached to the bug.
Thanks,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
On 2014-02-22 1:33 PM, Don C. Myers donmy...@myersfarm.com wrote:
Hi Charles
The attachment displayed fine for me in 4.2.1.1 from The Document
Foundation running in Ubuntu 13.10.
Guess I should have been clear.
I'm on Windows 7, 64 bit...
Henri? What OS are you running?
Thx guys...
--
To
On 2014-02-22 4:28 PM, Johnny Rosenberg gurus.knu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm subscribed to a few groups myself, maybe I confused this one with the
Apache OpenOffice one, but most of them seems to prefer everything but top
posting. Personally I prefer this way, I'm not sure what to call it, but
I'm
On 2014-02-20 9:39 PM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
Indeed, Greg doesn't work for Red Hat. Prior to working for LF, however,
he worked for Novell, another for-profit Linux company.
Good god, is that the best you can do?
What is your aversion to 'profit', anyway? You do realize
On 2014-02-21 8:34 AM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
On 02/21/2014 07:24 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-02-20 9:39 PM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
Indeed, Greg doesn't work for Red Hat. Prior to working for LF, however,
he worked for Novell, another for-profit Linux
On 2014-02-20 7:08 PM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
By striking the weakest part of the stack (sysv probably*did*
need a good replacement, but not one as ambitious as systemd) and
digging down into the kernel level (kdbus), Red Hat devs will now have a
very influential role in the
On 2014-02-20 8:03 PM, Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
Fsacundo impolitely omitted attribution, so I have to add it back...
I said:
That is such total FUD I just can't even say anything else about it
without using some unsavory words.
You no need to be disrespectfull...
How was
On 2014-02-20 10:36 PM, Mark David Dumlao madum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Sorry, Canek, no offense was intended, but if you go back and re-read your
'extremely overly enthusiastic' post (this plus the content is why I
On 2014-02-21 8:54 AM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
If you think all profit is the same, then we are talking on two
different wavelengths.
I didn't say that. I said that *everyone* operates under the profit motive.
On 2014-02-20 4:04 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Thinking about this more, since apparently using a separate
profile may just be 'overkill', how about something simpler, like,
for example, using eselect...
Something like
On 2014-02-21 9:28 AM, Mark David Dumlao madum...@gmail.com wrote:
It is one thing entirely to say you don't like some software, and
another thing entirely to obligate everyone else in the world to
never depend on it.
All myself and others have been insisting on is that systemd proponents
be
On 2014-02-21 10:28 AM, Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:03:47 -0500
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2014-02-21 8:54 AM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
If you think all profit is the same, then we are talking on two
different wavelengths.
I
On 2014-02-21 11:23 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Even someone who volunteers in the local soup kitchen feeding the
homeless is doing so under the profit motive. The things is, the
'profit' involved (may) only involve(s) a 'warm fuzzy good
feeling'.
If you read my previous words, I
On 2014-02-21 12:17 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Then you ignore self-destructive behaviour which is a common thing in
this world. It can even be intentional, causing no emotional,
financial, social or intellectual profit. Maybe you have never met
such a person or have never been in
On 2014-02-21 12:33 PM, thegeezer thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
On 02/20/2014 08:06 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Thinking about this more, since apparently using a separate profile
may just be 'overkill', how about something simpler, like, for
example, using eselect...
Something like:
# eselect
On 2014-02-21 2:35 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tanstaafl:
On 2014-02-21 12:17 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Then you ignore self-destructive behaviour which is a common
thing in this world. It can even be intentional, causing no
emotional, financial, social
On 2014-02-19 7:53 PM, Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
This is true, but gentoo is a little unstable to use on production. The
system must be on 365 days/year. ¿and when you need to update the
system? This will use all the processor and the system will be
overloaded. This means users
On 2014-02-20 7:04 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2014-02-19 7:53 PM, Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
This is true, but gentoo is a little unstable to use on production. The
system must be on 365 days/year. ¿and when you need to update the
system? This will use all
.
Ridiculous. Forget about Canek's rant...
This is about *choice*. Also, I would argue the *opposite of what Canek is
saying in this last rant...
Tanstaafl, can we please not use terms like rants? I'm just giving
my opinion, trying to be respectful and civil to the others
participants
On 2014-02-20 10:55 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
while I agree with most everything you said, your primary point -
that it should be the people who *don't* want systemd doing all of
the work
Hi all,
Does anyone know of any software that can create a bootable CD/DVD or
USB stick, that has a customizable menu that will let you boot pretty
much any ISO file you copy to the disk and point to with the menu?
It seems like I've seen something like this before, but all I can find
are
On 2014-02-19 2:04 AM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
For such a profile to be legitimate, systemd would have to be chosen as
the default.
Ridiculous. Forget about Canek's rant...
This is about *choice*. Also, I would argue the *opposite of what Canek
is saying in this last rant...
On 2014-02-18 4:05 PM, Sebastian Beßler sebast...@darkmetatron.de wrote:
First I thought that with systemd I have to use all the things shipped
with systemd like journald (which I don't like because I think that a
binary file for syslogs is just broken) so I looked into the config
files of
On 2014-02-17 3:17 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, my choice of words was not appropriate. I mean that not every
kernel dev is happy that kdbus is in the kernel now.
Noted...
Also, please don't CC me, I'm on the list...
Hi all,
Ok, before I go and open up a bug requesting this...
I know there have to be a lot of people on this list who can answer
this question...
Is making the use of systemd or not based on a selected Profile, as
opposed to manually trying to do it via USE flags etc, a practical
request,
On 2014-02-18 11:39 AM, eroen er...@falcon.eroen.eu wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:24:05 -0500, Tanstaafl
tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, before I go and open up a bug requesting this...
I know there have to be a lot of people on this list who can answer
this question
On 2014-02-18 1:14 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:22:23 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Yet again, I respect ones right to use whatever one wants, but I ask
to respect mine as
On 2014-02-18 1:54 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: On
Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I'm curious as to the extent of these programs, and to what extent
they *truly* require systemd.
I don't understand what you mean by the extent
Thanks to all who chimed in...
On 2014-02-16 3:27 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
You may have lost it in the link that Volker posted (thanks Volker), but this
comment from HaakonKL probably sums it
On 2014-02-17 12:52 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
And this is a very, very bad idea. Looks like you don't know matter at
all: to begin with kdbus protocol is NOT compatible dbus and special
converter daemon will be needed to enable dbus to talk to kdbus. The
whole kdbus
701 - 800 of 2231 matches
Mail list logo