Source: nbd
Version: 1:3.25-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.26.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: nbd
Version: 1:3.25-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.26.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Lucas,
[Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the bug]
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:09:56 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Do you have any idea why we don't see the same failure on
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Lucas,
[Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the bug]
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:09:56 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.
Do you have any idea why we don't see the same failure on
Source: prettytable
Version: 3.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.6.0-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066757
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: prettytable
Version: 3.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.6.0-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066757
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: sqlmodel
Version: 0.0.8-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0.8-6
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066771
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: sqlmodel
Version: 0.0.8-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0.8-6
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1066771
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: audit
Version: 1:3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.1.2-2.1
X-Debbugs-CC: vor...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070327
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Source: audit
Version: 1:3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.1.2-2.1
X-Debbugs-CC: vor...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070327
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Source: eclib
Version: 20231212-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20240408-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1069515
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: eclib
Version: 20231212-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20240408-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1069515
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: praat
Version: 6.4.05+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release
Source: praat
Version: 6.4.05+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release
Source: ukui-power-manager
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0.0.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070426
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: ukui-power-manager
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0.0.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070426
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: ruby-parslet
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: ruby-parslet
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: ruby-parslet
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.0.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: q2-feature-table
Version: 2023.9.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2024.2.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: q2-feature-table
Version: 2023.9.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2024.2.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: tiktoken
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.6.0-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: tiktoken
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.6.0-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: click
Version: 0.5.0-10
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.5.2-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: click
Version: 0.5.0-10
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.5.2-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On 06-04-2024 9:58 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Anyways, it looks like we could just lower the timeout to 1 second and
hope were fine for some time to come.
No. 1 second is *too short* for the PodmanRunner.test_copy_timeout test
on salsa. So I'll just disable
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On 06-04-2024 9:58 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
Anyways, it looks like we could just lower the timeout to 1 second and
hope were fine for some time to come.
No. 1 second is *too short* for the PodmanRunner.test_copy_timeout test
on salsa. So I'll just disable
Source: libcbor
Version: 0.10.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.2-1.2
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: libcbor
Version: 0.10.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.10.2-1.2
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than
Source: wsdd
Version: 2:0.7.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2:0.7.1-5
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: wsdd
Version: 2:0.7.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2:0.7.1-5
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: snapraid
Version: 12.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 12.3-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: snapraid
Version: 12.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 12.3-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: camelot-py
Version: 0.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.11.0-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1063891
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: camelot-py
Version: 0.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.11.0-4
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1063891
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: unattended-upgrades
Version: 2.9.1+nmu4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.10
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: unattended-upgrades
Version: 2.9.1+nmu4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.10
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: multiqc
Version: 1.14+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.18+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: multiqc
Version: 1.14+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.18+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Hi
On 08-05-2024 10:27 p.m., Eduardo Rolim wrote:
After the upgrade, the system no longer recognizes Portuguese accents,
rendering typing of accents impossible.
Might this be related to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2024/msg00094.html
If so, updating glib2.0 with the
Hi,
On 08-05-2024 6:06 p.m., Bill Allombert wrote:
Agreed, but gap does not actually breaks anything, it is just the tests
in testing that are broken. So I can do that but that seems a bit artificial.
Aha, that wasn't at all clear to me. If you don't want to do the
artificial thing (which is
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
is not a regression.
Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on
libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on
libpng16-16-udeb. The later
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
is not a regression.
Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on
libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on
libpng16-16-udeb. The later
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
is not a regression.
Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on
libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on
libpng16-16-udeb. The later
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 7:49 p.m., Simon McVittie wrote:
The version in testing, 4.12.5+ds-3, has the same dependencies, so this
is not a regression.
Is it? It seems that the version in unstable depends on
libpng16-16t64-udeb where the version in testing depends on
libpng16-16-udeb. The later
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 5:55 p.m., plugwash wrote:
Can you figure out what is going wrong and either fix it or override the tests?
As noted on IRC, it's unclear what caused this. I retriggered the test
and it's now picked up.
For those watching, britney2 would have done this by itself too after
Hi,
On 07-05-2024 5:55 p.m., plugwash wrote:
Can you figure out what is going wrong and either fix it or override the tests?
As noted on IRC, it's unclear what caused this. I retriggered the test
and it's now picked up.
For those watching, britney2 would have done this by itself too after
Hi,
On 05-05-2024 8:04 p.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
167s autopkgtest [09:50:25]: test test-dm-writeboost.sh:
[---
168s II: Checking for 14G available disk space...SKIP
How much disk space is used already by the time you get to this test?
The root of the testbed has 25
Hi Luca,
On 05-05-2024 10:04 p.m., Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Hence, I intend to apply these changes in the next src:systemd upload
> to unstable, probably next week.
In case anybody is aware of packages/programs needing an update to cope
with these changes, or any other issue, please let me know
Hi Luca,
On 05-05-2024 10:04 p.m., Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Hence, I intend to apply these changes in the next src:systemd upload
> to unstable, probably next week.
In case anybody is aware of packages/programs needing an update to cope
with these changes, or any other issue, please let me know
Hi Luca,
On 05-05-2024 10:04 p.m., Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Hence, I intend to apply these changes in the next src:systemd upload
> to unstable, probably next week.
In case anybody is aware of packages/programs needing an update to cope
with these changes, or any other issue, please let me know
Control: reassign -1 src:tracker
Control: found -1 3.4.2-3
Control: affects -1 src:sqlite3
Hi László,
On 05-05-2024 11:24 a.m., László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
It's the tracker autopkg testing that needs fixing.
So, I'm inclined to agree with your assessment, so let's reassign this
to
Control: reassign -1 src:tracker
Control: found -1 3.4.2-3
Control: affects -1 src:sqlite3
Hi László,
On 05-05-2024 11:24 a.m., László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
It's the tracker autopkg testing that needs fixing.
So, I'm inclined to agree with your assessment, so let's reassign this
to
Source: intel-vc-intrinsics
Version: 0.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't
Source: intel-vc-intrinsics
Version: 0.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't
Source: mac-widgets
Version: 0.10.0+svn416-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: mac-widgets
Version: 0.10.0+svn416-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: mac-widgets
Version: 0.10.0+svn416-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: vagrant
Version: 2.3.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: vagrant
Version: 2.3.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: vagrant
Version: 2.3.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: gnome-snapshot
Version: 46~beta-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: gnome-snapshot
Version: 46~beta-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: rapiddisk
Version: 9.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it recently started
failing in unstable and testing. Can you please investigate the
situation and fix it? I copied
Source: rapiddisk
Version: 9.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it recently started
failing in unstable and testing. Can you please investigate the
situation and fix it? I copied
Source: diffoscope
Version: 259
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: diffoscope
Version: 259
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Source: diffoscope
Version: 259
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed
Hi
On 04-05-2024 3:36 p.m., Holger Wansing wrote:
I think Bastian's approach is, to remove kbd-chooser from the archive, since
it was stated (see below) that it's no longer in use.
It might be that udd assumes all packages that build a udeb are used.
d-i has switched away from it to
Hi
On 04-05-2024 3:36 p.m., Holger Wansing wrote:
I think Bastian's approach is, to remove kbd-chooser from the archive, since
it was stated (see below) that it's no longer in use.
It might be that udd assumes all packages that build a udeb are used.
d-i has switched away from it to
Hi,
On 04-05-2024 11:39 a.m., Jerome BENOIT wrote:
What would be the best way to unblock the migration of gap and gap-io ?
If gap isn't going to change (which might be the easiest solution), then
file bugs and fix those reverse dependencies. Those bugs are RC and in
due time will cause
clone 1035474 -1
block 1035474 by -1
reassign -1 xorg-dev
retitle -1 xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev
found -1 1:7.7+23
thanks
On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:50:16 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:28:02AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti
clone 1035474 -1
block 1035474 by -1
reassign -1 xorg-dev
retitle -1 xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev
found -1 1:7.7+23
thanks
On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:50:16 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:28:02AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti
clone 1035474 -1
block 1035474 by -1
reassign -1 xorg-dev
retitle -1 xorg-dev: drop dependency on libdmx-dev
found -1 1:7.7+23
thanks
On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:50:16 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:28:02AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 19:03:07 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Can you please elaborate? I'm not seeing anything serious in this bug
report.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:42:34 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> kbd-chooser is no longer in use, I think.
> Or am I
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 19:03:07 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Can you please elaborate? I'm not seeing anything serious in this bug
report.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:42:34 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> kbd-chooser is no longer in use, I think.
> Or am I
Hi Bastian,
On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 19:03:07 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Can you please elaborate? I'm not seeing anything serious in this bug
report.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:42:34 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> kbd-chooser is no longer in use, I think.
> Or am I
Hi,
On 30-04-2024 8:54 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Can you point me to the code that evaluates dpkg's Testsuite-Triggers to
schedule these tests? Maybe it's possible to convert dpkg's Testsuite
field to a (hardcoded) list of additional triggers ...
I think you mean this:
Hi,
On 30-04-2024 8:54 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Can you point me to the code that evaluates dpkg's Testsuite-Triggers to
schedule these tests? Maybe it's possible to convert dpkg's Testsuite
field to a (hardcoded) list of additional triggers ...
I think you mean this:
Hi,
On 30-04-2024 12:43 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-dkms
Right. I was talking about Testsuite-Triggers in the sources file
generated by dpkg. Unfortunately the automation one gets with autodep8
doesn't extend that far and the triggers you are interested in are
Hi,
On 30-04-2024 12:43 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-dkms
Right. I was talking about Testsuite-Triggers in the sources file
generated by dpkg. Unfortunately the automation one gets with autodep8
doesn't extend that far and the triggers you are interested in are
Hi Andreas,
On 29-04-2024 10:52 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
These failures could show up as autopkgtest failures in bookworm-pu.
Are they flagged somewhere in your tooling s.t. they don't go unnoticed?
As I hinted at in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069600#25, once
Hi Andreas,
On 29-04-2024 10:52 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
These failures could show up as autopkgtest failures in bookworm-pu.
Are they flagged somewhere in your tooling s.t. they don't go unnoticed?
As I hinted at in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069600#25, once
Hi,
On 27-04-2024 7:52 p.m., Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
Can you please look at libproxy<->glib-networking? libproxy excuses show
glib-networking tests failing, but they are working in sid.
And that's not missing a versioned Depends and/or Breaks? I.e. this is a
test only failure?
Paul
Hi,
On 28-04-2024 9:34 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
What kernel is running inside the test environment and what is the best
way to install its headers?
Can you help me find the answer? I guess you don't mean "the current
kernel of the suite under test" but rather a flavor? We use
Hi,
[Release Team member hat on]
On 27-04-2024 11:48 p.m., Manny wrote:
As an aptitude user, I was bothered by the lack of aptitude ways of
doing things in the upgrade guide.
I anything, I prefer the Release Notes to move to using one tool in the
instructions, without insinuating that it's
Hi,
[Release Team member hat on]
On 27-04-2024 11:48 p.m., Manny wrote:
As an aptitude user, I was bothered by the lack of aptitude ways of
doing things in the upgrade guide.
I anything, I prefer the Release Notes to move to using one tool in the
instructions, without insinuating that it's
Source: netplan.io
Version: 0.107.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails on s390x (and maybe on armel/armhf, but that's
hard to tell because of the
Source: netplan.io
Version: 0.107.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails on s390x (and maybe on armel/armhf, but that's
hard to tell because of the
Source: ca-certificates-java
Version: 20240118
Severity: important
Hi,
The migration of `apt` was blocked because of apparent regressions in
ca-certificates-java. The test can-install-jre tries to install all
available jre-headless packages, regardless of pinning, so it will try
to install
Source: ca-certificates-java
Version: 20240118
Severity: important
Hi,
The migration of `apt` was blocked because of apparent regressions in
ca-certificates-java. The test can-install-jre tries to install all
available jre-headless packages, regardless of pinning, so it will try
to install
Package: spyder
Version: 5.5.1+ds-1
Severity: minor
While I was searching for some option, I stumbled upon the
"Configuration per file" window (under the "Run" tab in the menu, or via
-F6). The names of the sub windows are half hidden in my setup (I
use KDE if that matters and I have adjusted
Package: spyder
Version: 5.5.1+ds-1
Severity: minor
While I was searching for some option, I stumbled upon the
"Configuration per file" window (under the "Run" tab in the menu, or via
-F6). The names of the sub windows are half hidden in my setup (I
use KDE if that matters and I have adjusted
Hi,
On 24-04-2024 7:42 p.m., Jérémy Lal wrote:
Inform the Release Team and we can either schedule the combination
manually, add a hint or both.
Isn't it processed automatically ? What needs manual intervention and
what doesn't ?
Well, the migration software *tries* to figure out
Hi,
On 24-04-2024 7:38 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
On 24-04-2024 7:35 p.m., Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
What to do with autopkgtests that fail in testing because of problems
with
packages in testing that are fixed in unstable, e.g. the autopkgtest for
speech-dispatcher/0.11.5-2 on
Inform
Hi,
On 24-04-2024 7:35 p.m., Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
What to do with autopkgtests that fail in testing because of problems with
packages in testing that are fixed in unstable, e.g. the autopkgtest for
speech-dispatcher/0.11.5-2 on
Inform the Release Team and we can either schedule the
Source: slurm-wlm
Version: 23.11.4-1.4
X-Debbugs-CC: bdr...@debian.org, vor...@debian.org, mckins...@debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of slurm-wlm the autopkgtest of slurm-wlm fails in
testing when that
Source: slurm-wlm
Version: 23.11.4-1.4
X-Debbugs-CC: bdr...@debian.org, vor...@debian.org, mckins...@debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of slurm-wlm the autopkgtest of slurm-wlm fails in
testing when that
Hi,
On 22-04-2024 10:39 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Nice. Is there a chance to get isolation-machine supported on salsa.d.o,
too?
I don't know. I'm not involved with salsa.
For this concrete case it may be as simple as adding dependency on sudo.
In case it is trivial for you to rerun the
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: retitle -1 erfs: no longer functional, should be removed
Hi
On 22-04-2024 1:37 p.m., Skyper x wrote:
The erfs service was shut down and this tool is no longer functional. It should
be removed.
Please file an RM bug against the ftp.debian.org pseudo
1 - 100 of 19818 matches
Mail list logo
