ives back simple true or
> false wether the login should be allowed?
Have a look at https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/post_login_scripting/
There is an example for denying a connection in an external script.
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Necklenbroicher Str. 45a - D-40667 Meerbusch - Germany
pecific user. But it looks like this is impossible:
sieve_redirect_envelope_from is a server wide setting; and the sieve script
doesn't allow changing the envelope...
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Necklenbroicher Str. 45a - D-40667 Meerbusch - Germany
EMail: thom...@wupper.com
to update this registration since
SpamCop introduced the Mailhost configuration somewhere around 2013.
Looks like nowadays every recipient has to add the forwarding servers manually.
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer
CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH
Hansaallee 191-193
40549 Düsseldorf
Telefon: +49 (211
filters would not recognise?
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Necklenbroicher Str. 45a - D-40667 Meerbusch - Germany
EMail: thom...@wupper.com IRC-Nick: Mechti
Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong. I'm mad but not ill.
___
How would it harm their employees if they put in "Mailgun Technologies" as
Organization?
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Necklenbroicher Str. 45a - D-40667 Meerbusch - Germany
EMail: thom...@wupper.com IRC-Nick: Mechti
Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wr
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 11:10:56PM +, MRob via mailop wrote:
> Why isnt it standard to put the envelope sender into the RECEIVED header?
> Does any MTA do it?
Exim does; the default received_header_text contains
"${if def:sender_address {(envelope-from <$sender_address>)\n
e. Lots of DNS errors for *.mail.protection.outlook.com ;
sometimes hosts do resolve, but most of the time I see FORMERR
(server doesn't support edns), SERVFAIL or connection timed out ...
Looks like this already started on Jul 03, but errors increased over time.
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Necklenbroich
results, which would get the same level of securtiy with
already existing standards.
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Necklenbroicher Str. 45a - D-40667 Meerbusch - Germany
EMail: thom...@wupper.com IRC-Nick: Mechti
Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm
nt much time investigating this issue...
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Necklenbroicher Str. 45a - D-40667 Meerbusch - Germany
EMail: thom...@wupper.com IRC-Nick: Mechti
Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong. I'm mad
op.org ([2a03:4000:37:599:d8ce:dff:fee1:81c2])
> by herm.doylem.co.uk with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Debian))
^^^
It does. Exim adds "s" to received_protocol for encrypted connections.
Check your exim log for the cipher that was use
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:04:19PM +0200, ox wrote:
>[...]
> But, you neglected to add - That is is not socially acceptable to
> define protocols for defrauding people, to tell lies, commit deception,
Who defines waht is socially acceptable?
btw: most phishing pages use HTTP; HTTP is used for
are used.
Try calling spamc with the -u username argument. If you have an own
.qmail for each user, you can set a specific name there; if you use
a global .qmail-default, you can try -u $RECIPIENT to get qmails
envelope recipient.
Thomas
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Kleeblatt 2 - D-42119
score
dropped to 0.56, so it wasn't marked as Spam anymore...
So this isn't really a bug (SA works exactly as documented), but I wonder
if this is the intended behaviour. IMHO a message marked as Spam should
never be autolearned as Ham.
Thomas
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer
(65.246.50.11)
for every non-existing .com and .net domain. All other root nameservers
are working correctly. So depending where your query goes, you may get
this wrong answer...
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Kleeblatt 2 - D-42119 Wuppertal - Germany
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
(which is called SEMIFORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD).
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Kleeblatt 2 - D-42119 Wuppertal - Germany
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC-Nick: Mechti
Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong. I'm mad but not ill
-ignorant.org it would be necessary to
check domain names (from 'From:' and/or 'Received:' headers) against
these lists. It seems that you have to write a new rule for EvalTests.pm
to accomplish this.
--
Thomas Mechtersheimer - Kleeblatt 2 - D-42119 Wuppertal - Germany
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
16 matches
Mail list logo
