On Saturday 05 June 2004 09:51, Owen Fraser-Green wrote:
Now, I know an envy24mixer exists to make life easier for me but surely
it would be a bit nicer if the mixer interface provided a more
consistent abstraction. In my situation, I want my software to be useful
without a screen so the
On Monday 30 June 2003 09:26, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Good idea.
how about /usr/include/asihpi/hpi.h
well, assuming the certain header location is not recommended.
basically, the kernel sources must not refer to the standard header
files for user-space. if you need a header file for the
I've got things working with my ASI6114. Playback works well.
Alsamixer shows me a bewildering array of controls, few of which seem to do
anything. How do I control stream levels?
Cheers!
|-|
| Frederick F.
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 20:40, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
Try aplay -Dhw:0,0,1
Works, as does hw:0,0,2 and hw:0,0,3. Curiously, hw:0,0,4 returns EBUSY, not
ENODEV as I would have expected. Is this a normal feature of ALSA?
For ALSA the card has one device, and multiple subdevices.
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 01:14, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
I have attached a patch against alsa-driver-0.9.4
But I'm not sure if this is the desired form, or whether I have located the
driver in the correct part of the tree.
I've tried building things with the patch, and have some questions:
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 11:39, Paul Davis wrote:
why not just quote to them the list of audio interface manufacturers
and chipset makers who have provided the necessary information, and
then ask them if they want to part of that list or marked as
unsupportable. the list is determinable from
On Sunday 05 January 2003 10:05, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
Well, you're talking about PCM devices (subdevices are one level after
devices):
cards - pcm devices - pcm subdevices
What are the differences between a device and a subdevice in general? Is
this indicative of some underlying hardware
On Monday 24 June 2002 10:17, Paul Davis wrote:
the names above are not defined on all cards (except for default).
i think we need a kind of config database for each card.
this is useful not only for pcm but also for parsing the mixer
structure.
i think this is the wrong solution. i believe
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, James Tappin wrote:
Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be frightened off
by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into thinking that 0.5 is
the safer option.
My understanding is that SuSE 8.0 is shipping with 0.9.0beta12. That's
starting to
