Moving alsa to the kernel will certainly increase the projects momentum, but
do keep the framebuffer story in mind.
Heres what google dragged in:
http://eca.cx/lad/2000/Jun/0106.html
I would regret to see something like that happening to alsa. Please do not
compromise in exchange for
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
If nobody has comments, I'm ready to prepare a whole patch for Linus
against the actual 2.5.1pre code.
My only comment: ALSA has waited long enough. It's now ready for hardcore.
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
If nobody has comments, I'm ready to prepare a whole patch for Linus
against the actual 2.5.1pre code.
My only comment: ALSA has waited long enough. It's now ready for hardcore.
Go for it.
___
Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
If nobody has comments, I'm ready to prepare a whole patch for Linus
against the actual 2.5.1pre code.
My only comment: ALSA has waited long enough. It's now ready for hardcore.
Go for it.
Well, no choice now ! :-)
--
Emmanuel
one thing we desperately need for the inclusion in the kernel is a
working and complete mailing list archive.
i expect many new people taking a peek at alsa development now, if
only grumpy kernel hackers seeking reasons why oss is better :)
the geocrawler archive can only be described as an
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
Now that kernel 2.5.0 tree is started, shouldn't we start pushing to get
ALSA into the tree?
Let's go. Our latest patch against 2.5.0 is:
ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/kernel-patches/alsa-0.9.0beta9-k2.5.0-3310916.diff.bz2
The oss-move script (to
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 00:32, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
Now that kernel 2.5.0 tree is started, shouldn't we start pushing to get
ALSA into the tree?
Let's go. Our latest patch against 2.5.0 is:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 19:59, Josh Green wrote:
If nobody has comments, I'm ready to prepare a whole patch for Linus
against the actual 2.5.1pre code.
Jaroslav
I have some comments..
Wooohooo!
Yeah!
Cool!
Absolutely... we are approaching
If nobody has comments, I'm ready to prepare a whole patch for Linus
against the actual 2.5.1pre code.
Since there is no need for this patch to support 2.2 kernels, some
simplifications should be possible.
Duncan.
PS: I'm not saying that it is desirable to remove 2.2 support, it's just
a
If nobody has comments, I'm ready to prepare a whole patch for Linus
against the actual 2.5.1pre code.
i think we need to be just a little careful how we approach this. i
get the sense that many people feel that although ALSA has a much
better design than OSS, they also feel that the actual
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Paul Davis wrote:
If nobody has comments, I'm ready to prepare a whole patch for Linus
against the actual 2.5.1pre code.
i think we need to be just a little careful how we approach this. i
get the sense that many people feel that although ALSA has a much
better
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 14:18, Paul Davis wrote:
so do you feel absolutely comfortable in asserting that for all the
hardware that both OSS and ALSA support, ALSA's support is more or
less as good as the OSS code? i just worry that people who don't want
to see this change will argue that ALSA
Bob Ham wrote:
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 14:18, Paul Davis wrote:
Do you feel absolutely comfortable in assuming that it is neccessary
for ALSA to have its drivers in as good or better than state for it
to be included in Linux? Having Linux do sound the ALSA way is better
than having
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Takashi Iwai wrote:
That's true. And not all ALSA drivers have been tested well on the
current version, especially ones for old ISA chips or SB (and its
compatible) driver. In such a case, good means more stable or
support more chips. That's what lack ALSA lacks of
Bob Ham wrote:
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 17:37, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
See, what you've done here is confuse stable with developmental.
Easy mistake to make.
Hum,
Don't confuse developmental and crappy.
Easy mistake to make :-)
Regards
--
Emmanuel
My behaviour is addictive
At Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:00:49 -0800 (PST),
Ken Arromdee wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Takashi Iwai wrote:
That's true. And not all ALSA drivers have been tested well on the
current version, especially ones for old ISA chips or SB (and its
compatible) driver. In such a case, good means
Will that mean that alsa-driver will be in the kernel.
Where will alsa-lib, alsa-utils and alsa-tools go ?
Cheers
James
___
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
17 matches
Mail list logo
