RE: FW: amrecover bug?

2010-10-07 Thread Titl Erich
Hi Dustin -Original Message- From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On Behalf Of Dustin J. Mitchell Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 6:03 PM To: amanda-users@amanda.org Subject: Re: FW: amrecover bug? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Jon

[Amanda-users] amrecover 3.1.1 issue

2010-10-07 Thread mezzie
just an update. tested this for the past 2 days, everything is working fine. +-- |This was sent by richard.t@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.

Re: FW: amrecover bug?

2010-10-07 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Titl Erich erich.t...@ruf.ch wrote: I guess this finding should give you something to chew on Indeed! If I'm reading the hex dumps correctly, then, the first file is padded at the beginning with exactly 28424 bytes of zero. The file lengths differ by the same

RE: Re:

2010-10-07 Thread McGraw, Robert P
Dustin, I got the same error lastnight. hertz /gauss/export/users-j lev 3 partial taper: Error writing block: Mysterious short write on tape device: Tried 2097152, got 1052672 hertz /gauss/export/users-s lev 4 FLUSH while ejecting volume: Can't open tape device /dev/rmt/0cbn: Device busy

Re: Re:

2010-10-07 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:01 AM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote: I had been using 2048KB, which I had defined in tapetype,  when I was running Amanda 2.x and never got this error. Yes, it's a new error for something that used to be handled quietly. Basically, the kernel takes the