SV: Testing amvault

2010-10-08 Thread Gunnarsson, Gunnar
Hi Dustin, Good work releasing beta3. Few thing that come to my mind while testing amvault regarding slections of dumps. - latest dump with --src-timestamp latest - all dumps without specifying --src-timestamp - parts by specifying dates eg. --src-timestamp 20100926-20101008 I would likte

Re: Fwd: Windows partition incrementals

2010-10-08 Thread Prashant Joshi
Hi Jon, We identified a bug in ZWC about missing result for C drive in x response. We have fixed the issue and I am testing it before releasing the next Community edition version 3.1.3. In the meanwhile, have the backups worked after changing the estimate to client? Regards, Prashant On

RE: Re:

2010-10-08 Thread McGraw, Robert P
I went and reset my block size to 1024k and relabeled my tapes 1017 and 1018. define changer c4 { tpchanger chg-robot:/dev/changer/0 changerfile chg-zd-mtx-state property tape-device 0=tape:/dev/rmt/0cbn property

amvault - version 3.2.0beta3

2010-10-08 Thread Gunnarsson, Gunnar
I'm vaulting from config hansa and I'm getting parse error about hansa-vault config ? parse error: could not open conf file /etc/opt/amanda/hansa-vault/amanda.conf: No such file or directory amdevcheck: errors processing config file at /opt/sfw/sbin/amdevcheck line 113. parse error: could

Re: Testing amvault

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
these well enough? Or are they not working for you? - latest dump with --src-timestamp latest Works fine. - all dumps without specifying --src-timestamp Works fine. - parts by specifying dates eg. --src-timestamp 20100926-20101008 You can specify a range of *dump* timestamps (the dates

Re: Re:

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:40 AM, McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu wrote: Dustin, thanks very much for your help in resolving this. Sure thing. Jean-Louis has, in the interim, fixed the problem of not being able to eject when a fatal error occurs in the tape device. So this one is fixed twice

Re: amvault - version 3.2.0beta3

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote: I'm vaulting from config hansa and I'm getting parse error about hansa-vault config  ? Does such a configuration exist? I thought your config was named HANSA? Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer

3.1.2

2010-10-08 Thread Brian Cuttler
Dustin, Just installed 3.1.2 to replace a 2.6.1 on Solaris 10x86. Worked as well as could be expected, given that I told it to force level 0 on everything. A mistake since its 2 or 3 Tbytes of data an 'only' 2 LTO4 tapes per run. Thank you - I've noted the % indicated on the amflush, I'd often

SV: Testing amvault

2010-10-08 Thread Gunnarsson, Gunnar
ok this will vault all full dumps in my configuation but can I select only the most resent for each filesystem ? amvault --dry-run --fulls-only --dst-changer vault \ --label-template EMS1-7% --autolabel volume-error hansa What does most recent version mean in this case? Thanks Gunnar

Re: Testing amvault

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
Thanks for the tip about --autolabel any, by the way. I accidentally implemented it as --autolabel all. The fix is easy :) On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote: ok this will vault all full dumps in my configuation but can I select only the most

Re: Fwd: Windows partition incrementals

2010-10-08 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:52:51PM +0530, Prashant Joshi wrote: Hi Jon, We identified a bug in ZWC about missing result for C drive in x response. We have fixed the issue and I am testing it before releasing the next Community edition version 3.1.3. In the meanwhile, have the backups

Re: 3.1.2

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote: Feature request (?) - There are checks for DLE tape, seems almost                      silly but a check for                         SUM(DLEs) (tape_capacity * runtapes) One DLE with a full size larger than available

Re: 3.1.2

2010-10-08 Thread Brian Cuttler
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:06:40AM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote: Feature request (?) - There are checks for DLE tape, seems almost ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?silly but a check for ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? SUM(DLEs)

long running amandad on client

2010-10-08 Thread John Hein
I have a client with an amandad that has been running since Sep 23... backup 97592 0.0 0.1 26780 7016 ?? Ss 23Sep10 40:30.43 amandad Most of the backups on that client still work fine. But two DLEs fail nightly. On the server, you get: 1286525084.841860: chunker: getcmd: START

amvault report - *** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!

2010-10-08 Thread Gunnarsson, Gunnar
Is this because amvault is considered a flush ? Tape usage statistic is rather odd as well. Otherwise is seems to work quite well - good work ! Thanks Gunnar Gunnarsson *** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY! The dumps were vaulted to tape EMS1-71. The next 2 tapes Amanda expects to use are:

Re: amvault report - *** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote: Is this because amvault is considered a flush ? Tape usage statistic is rather odd as well. Can you send the trace log that generated this report? Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com

Re: 3.1.2

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote: I realize that there IS NO Solution within amanda. This is a capacity planning issue for the humans to solve, but amanda can warn via the amdump report, that problems are imminent and that human capacity planning is

Re: long running amandad on client

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:07 PM, John Hein jh...@symmetricom.com wrote: I have a client with an amandad that has been running since Sep 23... .. 2000 APPLICATION 36 |;auth=BSD;compress-fast;index;exclude-file=.no-amanda-backup;exclude-file=.nobak;exclude-file=.noback;exclude-file=.nodump;

Re: amvault report - *** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote: Is this because amvault is considered a flush ? .. *** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY! No, it was a bug - amvault didn't write the FINISH driver line before calling amreport, so amreport didn't think it was

SV: amvault report - *** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!

2010-10-08 Thread Gunnarsson, Gunnar
No I was wrong about it only delayed the flushing until at the end. Is that a new behaviour in versioh 3.2.0 ? The only problem I got was on the client side for the root filesystem zfs. /-- hansabck / lev 1 FAILED [/usr/local/bin/tar exited with status 2: see

Re: amvault report - *** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!

2010-10-08 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar gunnar.gunnars...@svk.se wrote: No is a HP Ultrium LTO 3 tape drive: Yes I think the data was written to tape I will verify that next week. OK. You should adjust the length in your tapetype definition, then - your tape appears to be at least

good, inexpensive startup taper ?

2010-10-08 Thread Christ Schlacta
can anyone recommend a good, inexpensive taper for a startup? I don't need terabytes of storage, so something in the low gb count, but fairly quick, widely available, and highly inexpensive would be best.