On 10/22/99, I wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Aengus Lawlor wrote:
The documentation says of CGI ON that "You can't choose any options that
way though". This isn't my experience. I just typed in the following URL
OK, as far as I can see
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Susan Alderman wrote:
I'd vote for removing the CGI command - one of the things that analog
has going for it is that it's simple to use, simple to set up. When
you start getting into security issues like this, all of a sudden
it's NOT simple to use/set up and people
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Aengus Lawlor wrote:
It's precisely because the CGI command makes Analog "simple to use,
simple to set up" that I'd prefer to keep it, if there was a simple way
to resolve the security issues. But I can see that that would involve
making Analog just a little bit more
Aengus Lawlor wrote:
On 10/22/99, I wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Aengus Lawlor wrote:
The documentation says of CGI ON that "You can't choose any options that
way though". This isn't my experience. I just typed in the following URL
o sticking
with the seperate CGI interface may be the best option.
Time to look into the #EXEC directive, perhaps?
Aengus
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [analog-help] CGI Error on NT IIS 4
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Internet
Date:
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
(And you can't make the form interface work at all until you've read at
least some of the documentation, so there is a much better chance that
people will read it there!)
Security through obscurity? :-)
I understand the logic in having two seperate
Sorry, didn't mean to send my previous message with this subject to the
list.
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England
"Due to the conflict in Kosovo, we will not be showing the movie Wag
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Aengus Lawlor wrote:
The documentation says of CGI ON that "You can't choose any options that
way though". This isn't my experience. I just typed in the following URL
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
Somewhat unorthodox and not recommended. Analog.exe is NOT a CGI program and
will not behave right.
You're a little out-of-date, Jeremy. In 3.9 you can make it work by
including the command CGI ON. Then it will return the correct CGI headers.
I stand corrected. Thanks for the clarification, Stepehn. Also, here's the link to
that binary, since that email never seemed to show up.
For Aengus and anyone else trying the new beta on a Win32 system:
I've posted an executable version of the form interface at
I'm currently attempting to run Analog 3.19B on an NT IIS 4 machine. I
have taken a some what unorthodox method to run Analog. My ISP doesn't
support Perl files, hence I can't use the CGI script to run Analog. So
here's what I've done. I've placed analog.exe, analog.cfg and all the
necessary
Jeff Longland wrote:
I'm currently attempting to run Analog 3.19B on an NT IIS 4 machine. I
have taken a some what unorthodox method to run Analog. My ISP doesn't
support Perl files, hence I can't use the CGI script to run Analog. So
here's what I've done. I've placed analog.exe,
12 matches
Mail list logo
