To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Stoyan Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
Android engineers say there's no date for cupcake, 1.5 SDK, etc., yet
there is this video of what
There is a pending fix here:
https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,9452
Note that the build system is a bit buggy and will not re-generate
system.img if you integrate this (even though it copies the proper file to
out/.../system/etc/vold.conf).
One way to force it is:
touch
Hi Cupcake today build version seems has same sdcard mount problem
Best Regards
Eric Chen
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Anonymous Anonymous
firewallbr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Sorry i coundt find mmcblk0 but i can see mtdblock0 mtdblock1 and
mtdblock2
*and btw this will not help
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dianne Hackborn
Sent: 25 March 2009 00:46
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Stoyan Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.com
I alslo got similar situation.
Follow this cupcake/development/tools/eclipse/README_WINDOWS.txt. I
already build a SDK for Linux and Windows environment. And ADT 0.9.0
for Eclipse.
But I got one trouble.
Under Windows environment ( I do not try this in linux yet).
I start the Eclipse and create
I think this is the thread you guys are looking for when trying to
build cupcake:
http://groups.google.com/group/android-platform/browse_thread/thread/775582c99fa2980f?hl=en
On Mar 25, 12:21 pm, a...@tw schosnab...@gmail.com wrote:
I alslo got similar situation.
Follow this
I'm also expirienced some problem with a today build of cupcake
I just download a cupcake branch of source code and build it.
I configured Eclipse for a new SDK, and appear the things is works
great, EXCEPT emulator.
1. I configured a new AVD as parameter i pointed my old sdcard.img
then loaded
I fear it's a packaging problem. Is there a file named vold.conf in
/system/etc ?I.e. what is the output of adb shell /system/etc/vold.conf
If the file is missing, the SDCard cannot be mounted even if it is
recognized by the kernel.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Victor vkrugli...@gmail.com
For me too the sdcard problem ...The file is missing(vold.conf) :( , but i
checked another old sourcebase..where sdcard work.. there also that file
missing !!
Any clues?
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:55 PM, David Turner di...@android.com wrote:
I fear it's a packaging problem. Is there a
Code drops before the one that was done about 2 weeks ago had another
mechanism for the management of the SD card (mountd vs vold), so that
vold.conf wouldn't be necessary there.
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous
firewallbr...@googlemail.com wrote:
For me too the sdcard
the vold.conf thing is a new feature of Cupcake so it's normal that this is
not available in previous builds.
vold is the name of the new mount daemon (the old one was named mountd I
believe) that adds support for encrypted partition and other stuff, though
most of this is currently disabled.
The
Hi JBQ,
Thanks for the reply.. i do see mountd.conf in my older version and no
mountd.conf or vold.conf in my current working version.. i do have a valid
sdcard image.. by any chance can i mount it?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.comwrote:
Code drops before
you may try:
1. adb shell
2. mount -t vfat /dev/block/mmcblk0 /sdcard
but Gallery and Camera do not recognize the SD card even it's mounted,
but you may brows sd card by adb shell and Eclipse
On Mar 26, 9:48 am, Anonymous Anonymous firewallbr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi JBQ,
Thanks for the
Sorry i coundt find mmcblk0 but i can see mtdblock0 mtdblock1 and
mtdblock2
*and btw this will not help much :( as i need it inside application to
browse data
Thanks everyone
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Victor vkrugli...@gmail.com wrote:
you may try:
1. adb shell
2. mount -t vfat
I just hope that this time the release date for the official SDK will
be BEFORE the update hits the masses. Not like it was with the 1.1SDK
- it was released way after 1.1 was released to end-users (the
argument from Google was something in the lines of Hey, this is a
small release with no mayor
tauntz wrote:
We need an official SDK -
and we need it as soon as the tree is stable enough (and way before
it's pushed to the carriers/end-users)
Please understand that Android is open source. There is no pushed to
the carriers/end users -- hardware manufacturers are welcome to pull
from the
Did you just say that Google is not pushing code/releases to tmo and
that tmo pulls the public source at random points in time, adds dream
specific bits and releases it to end-users? You do realize that all
releases till today have come from a closed source project and not
AOSP?
(Even if Google
tauntz wrote:
Did you just say that Google is not pushing code/releases to tmo
Of course Google doesn't push code/releases to T-Mobile. T-Mobile is a
mobile carrier.
and
that tmo pulls the public source at random points in time, adds dream
specific bits and releases it to end-users?
HTC
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.comwrote:
tauntz wrote:
Did you just say that Google is not pushing code/releases to tmo
Of course Google doesn't push code/releases to T-Mobile. T-Mobile is a
mobile carrier.
and
that tmo pulls the public source at
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google-proprietary bits on top
of the same platform as 1.0.
From the point of view of the Android platform (and therefore of the
SDK as well), the differences between 1.0 and 1.1 are extremely minor.
Cupcake is a branch name, it's not a released version. A
Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google-proprietary bits on top of the
same platform as 1.0.
From the point of view
@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google-proprietary bits on top of the
same platform as 1.0.
From the point of view of the Android platform (and therefore of the SDK as
well), the differences between
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the
SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google
Totally agree, Apple just release their 3.0 SDK beta for who has
purchased iPhone Developer Program. The final version comes in June,
so iphone developer has 3 months to familiar the new OS and let their
applications get all the new features. I hope all of us, who are
interested in Android, and
-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
I'm personally involved in the relevant discussions, so you can rest assured
that the people who need to know do know already.
JBQ
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com
: 24 March 2009 16:01
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
Hmm.. Despite the fact that this is what we want, we cannot make a guarantee
that the Cupcake SDK will be officially released strictly before the
platform
Message-
From: android-developers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the
SDK?
1.1
-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
Hmm.. Despite the fact that this is what we want, we cannot make a guarantee
that the Cupcake SDK will be officially released strictly before the
platform is available on retail phones.
Properly testing and packaging a SDK takes a lot
: android-developers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the
SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update
March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the
SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google-proprietary bits on top of
the
same platform as 1.0.
From the point of view of the Android platform
I have the impression that the community is very active around
android-oriented APPS, but not about android itself, maybe there's
also a problem with this mailing list being filled by requests on the
use of the SDK but not the development of the SDK, maybe there should
be a newsgroup
Shame on met i never read p class=note :x
This answers a lot
2009/3/24 Romain Guy romain...@google.com:
I have the impression that the community is very active around
android-oriented APPS, but not about android itself, maybe there's
also a problem with this mailing list being filled by
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the
SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the
SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google-proprietary bits
: android-developers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Romain Guy
Sent: 24 March 2009 17:49
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
All the SDKs released before 1.0 were no accident you
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Jean-Baptiste Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is
the SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google-proprietary bits on top
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is
the
SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
The problem is that 1.1 was the most recent and the concern is that as the
latest release has a device then SDK order this may be seen as an
acceptable way to do things
-
From: David Turner
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:27 PM
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
Al,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Dave,
I
March 2009 17:49
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
All the SDKs released before 1.0 were no accident you know.
So far, only the 1.1 SDK was released after the firmware (and not long after
at that.) I don't
Someone did compiled the cupcake sometime back and release an
unofficial SDK 1.5...
(how come no one mentioned this in the entire thread...)
Search the group for SDK 1.5
Cheers
Eric
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Romain Guy
Sent: 24 March 2009 17:49
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the SDK?
All the SDKs released before 1.0 were no accident you know.
So far, only the 1.1 SDK was released after
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Stoyan Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.comwrote:
Android engineers say there's no date for cupcake, 1.5 SDK, etc., yet
there is this video of what appears to NOT be an Android 1.1 phone,
AND Vodaphone claims it will start selling them this April.
You can download
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Stoyan Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.com
wrote:
Android engineers say there's no date for cupcake, 1.5 SDK, etc., yet
there is this video of what appears to NOT be an Android 1.1 phone,
Let us have a beta version for god sake...
On Mar 24, 12:11 pm, roland roland...@gmail.com wrote:
Totally agree, Apple just release their 3.0 SDK beta for who has
purchased iPhone Developer Program. The final version comes in June,
so iphone developer has 3 months to familiar the new OS and
Just need to lift this wool up so I can have a really good look at this
thread! :-) Just joking ...
... but joking aside, looks like we won't get a version of the cupcake
branch any time soon so ...
... can i have the vodafone version then? ;-) OTA ofcourse :-)
and what's with all the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:59 PM, zl25drexel zl25dre...@gmail.com wrote:
Cupcake is coming, and as you know it will break a lot of apps in the
market, those that use reflection private api. So where is the
Cupcake SDK/emulator for us to try our apps?
It will be available publicly when it's
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, David Turner di...@android.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:59 PM, zl25drexel zl25dre...@gmail.com wrote:
Cupcake is coming, and as you know it will break a lot of apps in the
market, those that use reflection private api. So where is the
Cupcake
There has been, and there is no, official ETA. Anything you hear/read
is speculation.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Stoyan Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, David Turner di...@android.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:59 PM, zl25drexel
On Mar 23, 9:32 am, Romain Guy romain...@google.com wrote:
There has been, and there is no, official ETA. Anything you hear/read
is speculation.
Sigh. I had a paragraph to add to that, but I think Sigh pretty much
covers it.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Romain Guy romain...@google.com wrote:
There has been, and there is no, official ETA. Anything you hear/read
is speculation.
Right. I knew I'd get this answer but at least it's better than the rumors.
Thanks Romain
Engineers can't talk about forward-looking scheduling aspects. That's
not our job, and that's not something we're allowed to talk about.
We can however talk about hard facts. There's been a source code drop
recently, and David gave instructions on how to use that to compile
your own SDK-like
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
Engineers can't talk about forward-looking scheduling aspects. That's
not our job, and that's not something we're allowed to talk about.
We can however talk about hard facts. There's been a source code drop
That would be way too much like including the community in what is
supposedly a community project. Google has not yet gotten there in terms of
internal policies or attitudes, although a growing number of individuals are
trying to walk the tightrope between community and commercial (thanks JBQ :)
On Mar 23, 10:39 am, Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be way too much like including the community in what is
supposedly a community project.
Zing!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Waiting for the inevitable Please move this to Discuss so we can
totally ignore you and pretend everything's OK post.
On Mar 23, 11:00 am, Sundog sunns...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 23, 10:39 am, Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be way too much like including the community
I certainly hope there aren't a lot of applications that use
reflection and private APIs.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:59 AM, zl25drexel zl25dre...@gmail.com wrote:
Cupcake is coming, and as you know it will break a lot of apps in the
market, those that use reflection private api. So where is
Can someone capable just compile the SDK and post it online for
everyone? Someone from Google? I dont really care if it's not
official, i just dont want to download the source tree just to build
the SDK, plus i need to do the tricks you mentioned to make it work on
windows.
On Mar 23, 1:11 pm,
Someone from Google? makes it official i guess :D
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:47 AM, AndroidApp zl25dre...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone capable just compile the SDK and post it online for
everyone? Someone from Google? I dont really care if it's not
official, i just dont want to download
Not if you stay anonymous (hint, hint) ;-)
On Mar 23, 7:58 pm, Anonymous Anonymous firewallbr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Someone from Google? makes it official i guess :D
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:47 AM, AndroidApp zl25dre...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone capable just compile the SDK and
60 matches
Mail list logo
