I dont think its worth speding too many thought on MVC at all. IMO,
that term in itself is not well defined at all, its just one more of
those terms that are fashionable in the software dev community for a
certain time frame. I remember when it was first coined - that was
back in the days of
I think MVVM is more suitable for Android.
That is widely use in WPF.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, sell.bergstr sell.bergst...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I dont think its worth speding too many thought on MVC at all. IMO,
that term in itself is not well defined at all, its just one more of
Why? Because the Wikipedia entry on the topic just is not that good.
In fact, MOST of the sites that show up in a Google search for MVC are
just not that good.
The only sites I found on the topic that are good are: 1) apple
developer sites on it and 2) IBM developer works. (in the developer
works
Ok, nice first answer.
The question is not stupid, because an Activity mix life cycle and
view, so implementing MVC is not so obvious. And to make simple, your
activity manage lifeCycle and delegate GUI to your GUI package. In
that package you do usual MVC. In fact you implement usual layers
I am with TreKing on this one.
The question is very vague. Does Sree want to know about MVC in
general? His question certainly looks so.
If so, then it's hardly Android SDK, and Wikipedia has an entry for
it, so why wasting people time and bandwidth.
This list seems to have a lot of noise like
5 matches
Mail list logo
