Hi everyone!
I tried to send this before. I suppose, it must have before I got the
registration mail back. So, please excuse, if this message is
repeated.
-Matti
2011/7/23 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com:
Hi I tried to run console-image for at91sam9260ek with following
configuration
Hi Maksym,
I have experienced the same by using this ~/.oe/environment-2008. It
sets DISTRO = angstrom_2008.1. I assume 2008.1 distro ignoress
bblayers.conf. It seems that angstrom_2010.x grants it. However, if
you have read/used
http://sakrah.homelinux.org/blog/2010/11/bblayers-bbappend/, be
bblayers.conf with corrupted characters.
-Matti
2011/7/25 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com:
Hi Maksym,
I have experienced the same by using this ~/.oe/environment-2008. It
sets DISTRO = angstrom_2008.1. I assume 2008.1 distro ignoress
bblayers.conf. It seems that angstrom_2010.x grants
= soft
-Matti
2011/7/25 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com:
Hi everyone!
I tried to send this before. I suppose, it must have before I got the
registration mail back. So, please excuse, if this message is
repeated.
-Matti
2011/7/23 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com:
Hi I
...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:02 PM, matti kaasinen
matti.kaasi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hii Maksym,
I have to draw my answer back. I tried dirrent combinations of
DISTRIBUTIONs and bitbake and angstrom revisions. Now I could not find
any references from logs regarding to layers - e.g
Hi OE developers!
I like the idea I've learned bblayers to work. I tried it first with
openembedded:2011.03-maintenance - bitbake:1.12 combination the
setup-script provides. Otherwise this combination works, but it seems
to me that it ignores totally bblayers.conf.
Is this true or do I possibly
combination.
Regards,
Maksym.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:13 AM, matti kaasinen
matti.kaasi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi OE developers!
I like the idea I've learned bblayers to work. I tried it first with
openembedded:2011.03-maintenance - bitbake:1.12 combination the
setup-script provides
Hi!
It seems that module_do_compile() method loose compilation products
(openembedded/2011.03-maintenance). Let's take
http://www.kunen.org/uC/beagle/kmodule-test.tar.gz sources from
http://www.kunen.org/uC/beagle/oe_kmod.html demo. Uncompressed sources
work fine. If I comment do_compile out from
advices how I could get
both environment set properly and results present in WORKDIR?
Thanks,
Matti
2011/8/14 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com:
Hi!
It seems that module_do_compile() method loose compilation products
(openembedded/2011.03-maintenance). Let's take
http://www.kunen.org
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your reply.
I try to stick in openembedded recipes also with kernel because I am
moving from ad-hoc = everything manually environment to formal
openembedded environment. True is that they need modification if
platform changes. However, all the dependencies should be taken
could find this useful!
-Matti
2011/8/18 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com:
Hi!
I still have no proper solution!
Some more information, though:
KERNEL_SOURCE parameter name should be replaced with KERNEL_SRCIn
order to get kmodule-test.tar.gz Makefile compatible with
module_do_compile
Hi!
I'm not quite sure if this is proper forum for my question, but as it
somewhat smells a bug, I try first here.
I was possibly faced with a bug related to image packing when
bitbaking with following configuration:
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION= 1.12.0
METADATA_BRANCH =
Hi!
Do anyone know how to configure busybox (busybox-1.13.2) for
installing hwclock? Now, with default set-up of at91sam9260ek
busybox-1.13.2/defconfig seems to have CONFIG_HWCLOCK=y
CONFIG_FEATURE_HWCLOCK_LONG_OPTIONS=y
CONFIG_FEATURE_HWCLOCK_ADJTIME_FHS=y
It seems to produce binaries to
Hi!
Do anyone know how to configure busybox (busybox-1.13.2) for
installing hwclock? Now, with default set-up of at91sam9260ek
busybox-1.13.2/defconfig seems to have CONFIG_HWCLOCK=y
CONFIG_FEATURE_HWCLOCK_LONG_OPTIONS=y
CONFIG_FEATURE_HWCLOCK_ADJTIME_FHS=y
It seems to produce binaries to
are needed.
-Matti
11. tammikuuta 2012 21.17 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
Hi!
Do anyone know how to configure busybox (busybox-1.13.2) for
installing hwclock? Now, with default set-up of at91sam9260ek
busybox-1.13.2/defconfig seems to have CONFIG_HWCLOCK=y
Hi!
I noticed that I sent my message below to wrong address. It happened
about month ago, so I don't know if it's still valid.
It appears that fakeroot_1.14.5.bb used as fakeroot recipe for
2011.03-maintenance branch (or any branch) is broken. This has already
been discussed in:
raj.k...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:23 AM, matti kaasinen
matti.kaasi...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that I sent my message below to wrong address. It happened
about month ago, so I don't know if it's still valid.
Have you tried latest maintenance branch
archive had also wrong md5 sum (naturally).
After pulling bitbake update this fixed and backup size matched with
fetched size.
thanks,
Matti
13. tammikuuta 2012 20.46 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:23 AM, matti kaasinen
matti.kaasi...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Hi!
I just wonder what tzdata/RCONFLICTS_${PN} = timezones
timezone-africa timezone-america
fields are referring to. I can't find any other reference from
openembedded/recipes for instance for timezone-africa than this
instance.
Should they not be: tzdata-africa tzdata-america ?
-Matti
Hi!
I have faced with a strange feature with Angstrom 2011.03-maintenance.
There is one package that does not get pulled to image with RDEPENDS
variable and all the packages it RDEPENDS on.
When I bitbake it with -c clean and run then bitbake for the targeted
image, this package seems to built
systematic RDEPENDS_${PN}. Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Matti
4. huhtikuuta 2012 16.54 Frank Agius ftag...@yahoo.com kirjoitti:
On 4/3/2012 4:48 PM, matti kaasinen wrote:
Hi!
I have faced with a strange feature with Angstrom 2011.03-maintenance.
There is one package that does not get pulled
Yes, Frank, you were right. _${PN} worked!
Thanks,
Matti
4. huhtikuuta 2012 22.05 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
Hi Frank,
In fact I had followed both conventions. I'm not quite sure what was
with this problematic package. Anyhow, I just stripped these
RDEPENDS_${PN
Hi developers!
Now, just after learning lesson about currently required syntax of R*
variables -
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/angstrom-distro-devel/2012-April/005928.html
- I would like to add my wish to get this fact documented to OE
official documentation.
By my brief check I found both
Hi!
I get data file clash error between bluez4 and udev when I try to
bitbake somewhat extended console image.
Both try to install /lib/udev/hid2hci.
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION= 1.12.0
METADATA_BRANCH = 2011.03-maintenance
METADATA_REVISION = 75c7b2f
TARGET_ARCH = arm
Hi,
Some more information:
bluez4-4.84 does not install hid2hci, whereas bluez4-4.95 does. So,
angstrom-2008.1 should restrict bluez4 version to 4.84 or perhaps
advance udev version.
-Matti
2012/6/15 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Something to add:
DISTRO=angstrom-2008.1
Hi developers,
It seems that bash-3.2-r12.bb does not make /bin/sh linking to /bin/sh.
Actually I suppose the problem is in bash.inc file.
It makes this link in pkg_postinst_bash-sh() function.
However, there is no RPROVEDES statement in recipe and therefore it does
not provde this bash-sh. There
Hi developers,
It seems that bash-3.2-r12.bb does not make /bin/sh linking to /bin/bash.
Actually, I suppose, the problem is in bash.inc file.
It makes this link in pkg_postinst_bash-sh() function.
However, as there is no RPROVIDES statement in the recipe, there is no way
using bash-sh package
bash-sh
+
ALLOW_EMPTY_bash-sh = 1
pkg_postinst_bash-sh() {
-cd $D/bin ln -sf bash sh
+update-alternatives --install ${bindir}/sh sh ${bindir}/bash 100
}
pkg_postrm_bash-sh() {
-ln -sf /bin/busybox /bin/sh
+update-alternatives --remove sh ${bindir}/bash
}
2012/11/17 matti
Hi Koen,
How are these versions related with OE-classic? Where are they sitting?
-Matti
2012/12/3 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
Op 17 nov. 2012, om 15:33 heeft matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com
het volgende geschreven:
Hi developers,
It seems that bash-3.2-r12.bb does
architecture while mine is not. On the other hand, it's not
necessarily that usual that RTC is needed as it was in our case when there
was a bug in at91sam9260 RTC.
-Matti
2012/12/4 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
Op 3 dec. 2012, om 20:20 heeft matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com
het volgende
Possibly this is not quite correct forum for my question. However, most
likely you know the correct answer.
I try to patch u-boot-denx for beaglebone with procedures below:
1) bitbake -f -c patch u-boot-denx
2) source editions in workdir
3) bitbake -f -c compile u-boot-denx
What happens is that
Hi!
What configuration kernel build really uses - .config or defconfig?
It seems, that menuconfig (bitbake -c menuconfig ) use always .config file.
I have problem that changes in defconfig are not seen in kernel features.
Instead they seem the same that are in .config file
I have tried
and copy the result to the defconfig in
the
meta-layer. Then I rebuild from scratch.
bitbake -c cleansstate virtual/kernel
bitbake virtual/kernel
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
u...@emagii.com
+46 (722) 427 437
22 okt 2013 kl. 14:04 skrev matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com:
Hi
to get used
instead of mine even though my layer should have higher priority. I hope
this is the last thing I should cleared.
Thanks,
Matti
2013/10/22 Ulf Samuelsson angstrom-...@emagii.com
On 2013-10-22 17:20, matti kaasinen wrote:
Thanks Ulf,
It seems to work in that way. However, I'm a bit
2013/10/23 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Hi Ulf,
Yes, linux.inc seems doing the job as you told - this clears a lot. I had
been patching wrong file:${S}/defconfig instead of ${WORKDIR}/defconfig.
It seems that I'm not alone with this mistake. ${S}/defconfig seems to be
created by two
2013/10/23 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com
for conf and include files it will use the BBPATH and not priority
which means your layer should appear before meta-beagleboard in BBPATH
order.
It did not help chnging BBPATH in layer.conf
It used to be
BBPATH .= :${LAYERDIR}
and I changed
are looking in the wrong file.
In Angstrom, you need to change BBPATH in setup-scripts/conf/bblayers.conf
Not in the layer.conf in your own layer.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
u...@emagii.com
23 okt 2013 kl. 14:24 skrev matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com:
2013/10/23 matti kaasinen
Hi!
Do anyone happen to know how u-boot should be set to access Linux created
ubifs partition correctly? I'm working on beaglebone variant board with
nand flash addition. Linux side (3.8.13) seems working fine provided that I
don't mount it in u-boot side. However, if i do, it gets corrupted. For
, isn't this really a bug in omap_gpmc.h, not
just a Linux version related problem?
Regards,
Matti
2013/10/25 Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com
On 2013-10-25 00:01, matti kaasinen wrote:
Hi!
Do anyone happen to know how u-boot should be set to access Linux created
ubifs partition correctly? I'm
) from [c000c641]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x1/0x46)
[ 184.494290] uncorrectable error :
[
Best Regards,
Matti
2013/10/25 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com
Hi Gary,
I think I have found something that could explain this behaviour. They
happen to be on u-boot side. In fact I just wrote to u
2013/10/25 Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com
Unfortunately fixing that to correct value 52 did not help either.
So, I'm running out out ideas. I'll enclose steps I executed both on Linux
and u-boot side and their outcome. These are from the initial state before
trying to fix that omap_gpmc.h.
2013/10/27 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 14:44 +0300, matti kaasinen wrote:
2013/10/23 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Hi Ulf,
Yes, linux.inc seems doing the job as you told - this clears a lot.
I had
been patching wrong file:${S}/defconfig instead
matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com
2013/10/27 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 14:44 +0300, matti kaasinen wrote:
2013/10/23 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Hi Ulf,
Yes, linux.inc seems doing the job as you told - this clears a lot.
I had
been patching
erase counter: 1/0
So, looks pretty much the same as before without defining -O switch.
-Matti
2013/10/25 matti kaasinen matti.kaasi...@gmail.com
2013/10/25 Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com
Unfortunately fixing that to correct value 52 did not help either.
So, I'm running out out ideas
I have experience with beaglebone only, but even with it I had to bitbake
u-boot-denx instead of simple u-boot. If I recall it correctly pure u-boot
does not crash though, but really wrong recipe gets run.
-Matti
2014/1/17 Philip Balister phi...@balister.org
On 01/17/2014 02:00 PM, Ulf
45 matches
Mail list logo
