Re: [AOLSERVER] Migrating to 3.4 from 2.3.3

2001-08-07 Thread Steve Woodcock
Jim Wilcoxson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 4. I saw some notes about rl_returnz (the gzip compression module) needing to do a different kind of Ns_Return thing to return raw data. I'm using our standard version and it works fine. Is this issue particular to the ArsDigita version? That was me

Re: [AOLSERVER] Migrating to 3.4 from 2.3.3

2001-08-07 Thread Mike Hoegeman
Jim Wilcoxson wrote: I'm working again on migrating to 3.x from 2.3.3 and could use some advice. 1. I downloaded the ArsDigita version - 3.3ad13 too. Are there any critical fixes I need to put in 3.4 before using it for production? Or is 3.3ad13 better for production? Or...? various

Re: [AOLSERVER] Migrating to 3.4 from 2.3.3

2001-08-07 Thread Jim Wilcoxson
Under 2.3.3, if a scheduled proc did a [ns_thread getid], it got back a number that corresponded to a Linux process (on Linux, every thread is a separate process). That isn't the case with 3.4 for scheduled procs. I don't know what the number is/means. The AD version has a special SEGV sig

Re: [AOLSERVER] Migrating to 3.4 from 2.3.3

2001-08-07 Thread Rusty Brooks
Is every thread a process, or does Linux just implement threads using a process pool (where each process is responsible for N-number of threads, where N=1 could be true). Linux implements threads as light weight processes, so they do tend to get their own process id (which also mean, I

Re: [AOLSERVER] Migrating to 3.4 from 2.3.3

2001-08-07 Thread Jim Wilcoxson
This isn't a Linux difference - it's an AS difference. On the same machine, 2.3.3 scheduled procs can do [ns_thread getid] and will get a number that represents a Linux process, but 3.4 will return a number that does not represent a Linux process, i.e., there is no corresponding number in the