I actually liked the aolserver.com site. How was moving to SourceForge
a good thing?
-Ayan
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel P. Stasinski wrote:
Kriston said that the bosses at AOL asked that the site go to a total
sourceforge interface, and that it was assumed to be a good thing. He also
I actually liked the aolserver.com site. How was
moving to SourceForge a good thing?
It's been on sourceforge for over a year, just had it's own face. I don't
think anyone below management level knows why it was changed, but
considering the flurry of code development going on now, I'm
Hi,
I'm the one who asked Kriston to change aolserver.com to point to
SourceForge. Here's why:
- With the exception of the documentation, the rest of the site already
pointed to tools on SourceForge, this move just completes the migration.
- While the short term situation with the
On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 11:17 AM, Nathan Folkman wrote:
A quick heads up on some of the work going on here at AOL with regards
to AOLserver.
Nathan,
Many of us who use AOLserver with OpenACS are stuck at version 3.3,
because of the patched version Arsdigita created to support
