Looks clean - but it *really* needs a logo to inject some motion.
Surely AOL could spring a few bucks to get a nice web 3.0 logo made
up? It's probably in their interest to have some AOL-inspired device
in the logo.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Dossy Shiobara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On 2008.04.08, Mark Aufflick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks clean - but it *really* needs a logo to inject some motion.
I agree; I'd like a modern and attractive logo treatment, along with a
few key icons for downloads, documentation, community ...
Surely AOL could spring a few bucks to get a
On Monday 07 April 2008 20:46, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
I wrote this in an email to Jim Davidson privately, earlier today:
|The problem with secure and reliable software is you [the software
|developer] really have no leverage to _make_ people upgrade.
|Insecurity and instability are
