On 08/05/2015 Amenel VOGLOZIN wrote:
Like Stephan Bergmann, I also think that the current test for newer version
cannot remain as it is.
I have adopted the version scheme based on the date as Andrea recommended. But
I am quite uncomfortable with:
1- effectively asking the entire extension
On 05/02/2015 08:47 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 30/04/2015 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
According to description.xml
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_XML_Elements#Element_.2Fdescription.2Fversion
The following is described: Required. A textual
here:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126298
Regards,
-Amenel.
De : Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com
À : api@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 8 mai 2015 8h42
Objet : Re: Description.xml/Version propper user
On 05/02/2015 08:47 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote
Envoyé le : Vendredi 8 mai 2015 8h42
Objet : Re: Description.xml/Version propper user
On 05/02/2015 08:47 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 30/04/2015 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
According to description.xml
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions
On 02/05/2015 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
My biggest concern is that the
extension manager 'catch' the published updates correctly with the
extension site.
Internally, this used to work this way (and probably still does): the
Extensions site advertises the latest version of its extensions
I recently released 18 dictionaries for spanish, I notice that the AOO
update alert didnt list it, I work with Marco with the english dictionary
and notice some differences on the metadata.
According to description.xml
