"Glenn Gilbreath, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's an even simpler method of setting the time on your PC. WATTCP
Sample apps contain a couple of useful utilities, the one I use is
NTIME.EXE.
SET TZ=CDT6CST
Then I use a couple of time servers to set my time:
time.nist.gov
Michael (xChaos),
I beg to differ, you DO NOT NEED TO REVERSE ENGINEER CORE.EXE
TO READ THE OBSCENITIES! You can read the file with a viewer
such as VIEW v 8.6, or another I have called SEE.EXE...or, if
you are industrious, you could even fire up a hex editor just
for viewing, such as
Glenn,
Your message to me arrived with no To: line, just as expected.
If, using NetMail for DOS, I put a line To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the .TXT file, the
To: address that counts is in the .WRK file, so the message should go there, and
the To: line in the .TXT file is just window dressing. Once
Eric Emerson's truck displays properly for me using EPM (OS/2 Enhanced Editor)
with fixed-width font, or in the Tiny Editor (text mode). I don't think I ever
tried viewing it in Arachne.
Those little circles could be tabs (ASCII 9) that some text editors and readers
show that way.
Programs I
Hello Steven
In Linux, the user does have a choice. When you compile
from source, you are free to do whatever you want.
However, if you are using an RPM (or some other kind of
precompiled, preconfigured package), you give up this
freedom. RPMs are for wimps.
Not so fast Steven. I think
Joerg Bartels wrote:
Compiling is great for poweruser with
big HDs big Mem etc. not for old comps.
I do all my compiling on a 486 with 16meg
RAM and 170meg HDD. Most things compile
in a minute or two. The kernel takes 40
minutes.
Cheers,
Steven
Joerg:
Arachne with hercules, emulating CGA looks very bad, and does not show
everything.
More surprising is how well Internet Explorer and Opera look in an
hercules monitor without emulation, all working under Windows 3.1.
I also have IE 5 and OE 5 for Windows 3.1 but not enough memory to
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 06:48:03 +, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Bartels wrote:
Compiling is great for poweruser with
big HDs big Mem etc. not for old comps.
I do all my compiling on a 486 with 16meg
RAM and 170meg HDD. Most things compile
in a minute or two. The kernel takes
For me, the discussion here on the list is a great intro to Linux. I
have never seen it nor talked face to face with anyone who has used it.
(Welcome to rural Vermont ;-)
My questions are two:
1) Are Linux programs easier to use than thier Windows or DOS
equivalents?
2) Are system
Joerg Bartels wrote:
I needed 2 days to downgrade SuSe 6.4 to
220meg with GUI on a 260meg HDD - so there
is not much room for runing or compiling
programs with extra libs.
If you want to run Linux from a 260meg HDD, I
suggest you try Slackware. A lean Slackware
installation (with
On 21 Aug 00 at 23:45, Clarence Verge wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000 21:42:40, Dale Mentzer wrote:
My advice is to stick to MT4D v6.00.
I'm sorry Dale. There have been reports of insufficient capacity
with that version. I would sugggest an upgrade to v7.25.
Ah, that must be the ambidextrous
"Thomas Mueller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your message to me arrived with no To: line, just as expected.
If, using NetMail for DOS, I put a line To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
.TXT file, the To: address that counts is in the .WRK file, so
the message should go there, and the To: line in the
Hi Dale,
You wrote:
---snip---
Ah, that must be the ambidextrous version. ;) Thanks.
Regards,
Dale Mentzer
Practice random acts of intelligence and senseless acts of self-control.
^
Just lurking,
Hi All,
Got probs with my site again... (see the URL at my sig below).
This inherently Arachne-related, so I guess this is on topic...
Weird... I'm sure I have added the proper /CENTER closures
below each corresponding CENTER tags. But some parts below
them still get centered. I counteract
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 03:19:41 -0400 (EDT), Glenn Gilbreath wrote:
I beg to differ, you DO NOT NEED TO REVERSE ENGINEER CORE.EXE
TO READ THE OBSCENITIES! You can read the file with a viewer
Geeze, calm down Whiz! No one accused you as a hacker! ;-)
Anyway, I think you're right, you can even
arachne-digest Wednesday, August 23 2000 Volume 01 : Number 1253
--
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 07:49:02 +1100
From: "Ron Clarke" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lost Clusters revisited
Hi Folks,
I find that I
16 matches
Mail list logo
