In a message dated 8/27/02 12:19:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4. Cognitive limitations: I'm no expert, but my hunch is that
many people are only willing to get worked up over a small
# of issues - taxes, abortion, immigration, defense... and
the dedicated might add their favorites like
I may be mistaken here, but don't public choice economists talk
about the
concept of rational ignorance to explain how small, concentrated
groups can
gain large focused benefits while spreading the costs in tiny pieces
across
the broader population?
They do - but it doesn't make
Kevin Carson wrote:
For an occupant, the incentive to build on one's own land would be the same
as always. Since there would be no restriction on the right of the actual
occupier of a piece of land to charge a price before quitting it
Does quitting have to mean selling full title? It
Several thoughts:
1) Might we be looking at the wrong profits when we see that a pop star
is making millions and wonder why more don't enter the market? For the
most part, it is the record campany (as you say) doing the hype for the
star, they really make the performer (this is a phenomena
4. is particularly persuasive. The old adage in politics is that if your
goal is to find a candidate that you agree with on every issue, run.
Otherwise voters have some beliefs held more deeply than others and accept
that the politician who supports the view on taxation they prefer does other
--- fabio guillermo rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. Cognitive limitations: I'm no expert, but my hunch
is that many people are only willing to get worked up
over a small # of issues - taxes, abortion,
immigration, defense... and the dedicated might add
their favorites like gun control or
