Re: [Assp-test] Subject line missing

I've had continual issues with their servers as well. A month or so back I stopped getting mail from -users completely and the mail from -test was sparse. I removed and re-added my self to the lists and I started getting mail as expected. * shrug * From: Hill, Brett hil...@nlbusa.com

Re: [Assp-test] Further issues with v2

Sounds like my old boss. Me: I have the exchange 2003 test server cluster up. I'm trying to test it out. Does anyone want to have their mailbox moved there to help me out? I put mine there a week ago and have not had any problems My boss: Sure! 1 week later... Boss: Why isn't webmail

Re: [Assp-test] Further issues with v2

On 2010-06-10 2:25 PM, Paul K. Dickson wrote: Sounds like my old boss. Me: I have the exchange 2003 test server cluster up. I'm trying to test it out. Does anyone want to have their mailbox moved there to help me out? I put mine there a week ago and have not had any problems My boss: Sure

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.7.5.4, and cPanel/WHM and ASSP DeLuxe issues

The way your OS identifies the perl binary process has nothing to do with assp AFAIK. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Hilario Fochi Silveira

Re: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex?

Ahh. Thanks! Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex?

I'm still not having any luck with it. It recognizes '' as spamlover and the .*? Hammers the cpu to the point of bringing assp to its knees. Thanks anyway :) Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick

Re: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex?

to enter that regex, often times almost duplicated, all over the place. Easier just to put it once in one file IMO. To each their own :) Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399

Re: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex?

Wow. Thanks! Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex?

just to put it once in one file IMO. To each their own :) Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com

[Assp-test] Show user whitelist?

Is there a way to show a specific user¹s whitelist in the v2 dev? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399

[Assp-test] Way to ignore spamloverre via another regex?

/ word N in it no matter how vulgar or spammy, resulting in 10% of it being nasty spam, or remove word N from spamloverre and risk getting mail I want tagged but passed completely blocked. Is there a way to say ³use spamloverre EXCEPT if it contains X bad word(s)²? Paul K. Dickson Systems

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

That seemed to take care of it. For some reason a bunch of the scores were 1.x, rather than just 1, 2, 3, etc etc. Not sure if that had anything to do with it. Thanks all for your feedback. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government

Re: [Assp-test] AutoUpdate possibly related to short smtp outages??

Define outage? Slow delivery, no response when telnetting to the smtp or relay ports on your assp box at all, etc etc? Did you check your back end mta's queue? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

-127.0.0.2; ) -- [Your Auto Loan Online]; May-18-10 02:35:02 /usr/local/assp/assp.pl version 1.7.5.1(1.0.05) (Perl 5.008008) initializing ; Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

/local/assp/assp.pl version 1.7.5.1(1.0.05) (Perl 5.008008) initializing ; Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Paul K. Dickson pdick

[Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

It is from the same email each time. Fritz, Here is the log with the context lines. Is there anything else I can get you to help determine why this email trips up assp? ay-16-10 16:00:10 40006-10676 74.208.158.4 bounce-rep...@usadcorp101.com to: swinpig...@fredco-md.net Regex:SpamLover

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

OK. I change MaxEquaHeader from the default of 10 to 3 and the ptr check to block. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Fritz Borgstedt f

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

attempt to buy a house be ruined because of a spam filter. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de Reply-To: ASSP

Re: [Assp-test] Newest stable ASSP 1.x crashing.

IMO loan is an EVIL word when it comes to spam.. I don't want it getting ANY good credit at all, I just don't want it rejected. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399

[Assp-test] Header log error.

³Welcome² is in whiteRe. It is not in any of the others. Noreply isn¹t in bombdata. I¹m running 1.7.1.5 (1.1.04) X-Assp-Score: -5 (SPF pass) X-Assp-Score: -5 (whiteRe: 'welcome') X-Assp-Score: 10 (blackRe: 'welcome , cheapest') X-Assp-Score: -5 (bombSuspiciousRe: 'welcome , cheapest ,

Re: [Assp-test] Message not scored, counted as OK mail.

Thanks Fritz. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] Message score lower limit not observed. Bug?

My fault. Sorry. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test

[Assp-test] 1.7x 2.0.05 log error.

AdminUpdate: asspCfgVersion changed from '1.7.1.4(2.0.05)' to '1.7.1.4(2.0.04)'; I went from 2.0.04 to 2.0.05, not the other way around. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov

Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....

. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date

Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....

Doesn't matter. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....

http://www.kirsle.net/doc/perl510.html Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list

[Assp-test] Message score lower limit not observed. Bug?

46330-18508 [MessageOK] 199.231.142.162 magicso...@coastingfly.com to: rpur...@frederickcountymd.gov -- Message OK -- [FWD RE Confirmation] - notspam/18508.eml; I¹m running 1.7.1.4 2.0.05 Is this a bug or am I missing something? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information

[Assp-test] Email block report Show File not showing the correct email.

. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick

Re: [Assp-test] spam slipped through, general question

Yeah. FWIW I have both RWL and GRIP turned off which has resulting in much better accuracy. YMMV. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: K Post

Re: [Assp-test] Email block report Show File not showing the correct email.

It there any way to make sure these files stay available for the 30 days? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Interagency Information Technologies Frederick County Government Frederick, MD 21701 pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Paul K. Dickson pdick

[Assp-test] Mail meets message scoring lower limit but is not tagged.

] helo=arlington-greene.com) with IPv4:25 by mailgw2.frederickcountymd.gov; 18 Mar 2010 07:58:04 -0400 Received: from reference.com ([72.17.202.50]) by arlington-greene.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:46:03 -0400 From: HSBC Bank jaksk...@reference.com Paul K

[Assp-test] v1 new assp.pl version notification request.

At the top of the web interface, can it specify the release status? Beta, RC, Stable? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 -- End of Forwarded Message

Re: [Assp-test] Rc 401.. Sending address automatically added to the whitelisted.

As usual, my oversight. Sorry all. Shouldn't be looking into things at 1am anymore :D From: Paul K. Dickson pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:15:31 -0500 To: ASSP development mailing list assp

[Assp-test] 204 compilation error on start

Starting ASSP Anti-SPAM Proxy server in /usr/local/assp Global symbol $npExternalRe requires explicit package name at /usr/local/assp/assp.pl line 10482. BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /usr/local/assp/assp.pl line 27660. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick

[Assp-test] Rc 401.. Sending address automatically added to the whitelisted.

Why? Mar-03-10 00:48:04 95283-24749 67.201.63.155 i...@governmentjobs.com to: velger...@frederickcountymd.gov Regex:SpamLover 'Frederick County Government'; Mar-03-10 00:48:04 95283-24749 67.201.63.155 i...@governmentjobs.com to: velger...@frederickcountymd.gov score 15 Regex:bombSubjectRe 'Job';

[Assp-test] Shouldn't whiteorg negate scoring if PB/Scoring is turned off for white and np?

X-Assp-Delay: m...@fredco-md.net not delayed (whiteorg 167.102.228.3); 28 Feb 2010 14:30:36 -0500 X-Assp-Score: 15 (Extreme Bad History for 167.102.228.3) X-Assp-Envelope-From: prvs=1675a67da9=postmas...@dhr.state.md.us X-Assp-Intended-For: m...@fredco-md.net X-Assp-Version: 1.7.1.0(RC 0.2.04)

Re: [Assp-test] Shouldn't whiteorg negate scoring if PB/Scoring is turned off for white and np?

Anyone? From: Paul K. Dickson pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:24:55 -0500 To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Assp-test] Shouldn't whiteorg negate

[Assp-test] Block report returning info for other domain.

...@assp.local Conversation: Test Subject: Test dspangenb...@frederickcountymd.gov=spammeis...@frederickcountymd.gov=1 Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 ³ Any ideas? Rc 2.01 Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator

Re: [Assp-test] Block report returning info for other domain.

Hrm. Looks like the proper report finally came through, however it keeps sending them over and over and over... Every min or so for the last 25min:( Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Paul K

[Assp-test] Outbound mail being checked by spamloverre. 1.7.1 rc202

Don¹t know why you would want to. Just an FYI incase it isn¹t normal. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 -- Download Intel#174

Re: [Assp-test] Block report returning info for other domain.

Must have been something up with exchange. Sorry for the junk email;) Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Paul K. Dickson pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp

[Assp-test] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re.

it would reduce some of the load on the server because it would be a faux-whiteRe.. Numerous other checks would be skipped. Thoughts? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM][!] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re.

Oh. :-/ Paul == red in the face :D. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 25 Feb

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM][!] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re.

I specify. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Hill, Brett hil...@nlbusa.com Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:50:57 -0500

Re: [Assp-test] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re

It doesn't seem to be checking the spamloverre then. I've tested several different times and can't get it to recognize the keywords. Not in a real email test or the analyzer web interface. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM][!] Re: [SPAM][!] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warni

though it had those phrases in it. The only way I got that mail to be passed as a spam lover message was to put the recipient account in spam-lovers. Defeats the purpose of having a Re if you have to put the target accounts in spamlovers anyway. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick

Re: [Assp-test] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re

Moved to rc2 w/ out any changes to my config and it¹s working now in the web interface. I assume it is elsewhere. Thanks Fritz! Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Paul K. Dickson pdick

[Assp-test] 1.7.1 rc 0.01.005 rc0.02.00, bad attachment, message OK.

...@nish.org to: sjo...@fredco-md.net [spam found] -- bad attachment 'NISH eLearning.mht' -- [NISH Academy Online eLearning Courses What s In It]; Feb-25-10 19:43:46 -- Message OK -- [NISH Academy Online eLearning Courses What s In It]; Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County

[Assp-test] Black subject regex?

Anyone have one? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools

Re: [Assp-test] Black subject regex?

Sorry, I meant to say that to assp-user and it should be blank, not black. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Paul K. Dickson pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list

[Assp-test] Bombsubjectre default suggestion.

\battention=0.5 FWIW Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 -- Download Intelreg; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools

[Assp-test] Word matches in regex's, great site.

Very useful for seeing what words start with, end with, or contain words you might be using in regex¹s so you can avoid false matches. http://www.allwords.com Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399

Re: [Assp-test] 1.6.5.5 stable not loading

This mornings update is working. Thanks Fritz. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Dickson, Paul pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test

[Assp-test] 1.6.5.5 rc1 and rc2

Whitere doesn¹t appear to be working. I tested with entries that were working before that are single words with out expressions. The web analyse interface nor incoming mail from a non whitelisted email address shows anything found in whitere. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick

Re: [Assp-test] 1.6.5.4 (1.0.00) Bombre...again

I sent you a very explicit email to test. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Hill, Brett hil...@nlbusa.com Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 11 Feb

[Assp-test] 1.6.5.4 stable bug in applying changes to auto spam corpus correction.

I just deleted the 6 in 0.6 and typed 7 to change it to 0.7 Feb-11-10 19:07:33 Admin connection from 192.168.1.213:57802; page:/; main exception: Undefined subroutine main::(Syntax: a.a[a]-b.b[b]- or empty - default is 0.6-1.4-4000) If the corpus norm (the weight between spamwords/hamwords)

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP version 2.0.1(0.7.07) MaxWhitelistDays does not work

I haven't run 2.x so I wasn't sure if it contained an initial addition date as well. Ignore my previous email. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Anders Westin anders_we...@telia.com Reply

Re: [Assp-test] Some errors and troubles with rebuildspamdb

Keep in mind this originated from Fritz. Nothing against Thomas. He certainly does great things. Just give credit where credit is due :). Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: mxx m...@mailspot.at

Re: [Assp-test] Problem to add Domains in Whitelist, assp Version 2.0.1.7.0.4

I'm curious if this is only the case if the wildcard field is empty. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Маллиндайн Стивен (Steve Mallindine) st...@sc.ru.ru Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list

[Assp-test] Sender: noreply+feedpr...@google.com

If that is in the headers and that address is on the whitelist, AND whitelisted email is set not to be bayesian scanned, shouldn¹t the mail pass Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP archive plugin

IMHO assp's function should remain filtering spam only. Anything else should be a separate tool. Not to mention a good email archiving solution is very complex and storing a copy of every mail in the file system is highly inefficient. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP archive plugin

I agree. I like assp because it's fast and light. Avoid the bloat. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Doug Lytle supp...@drdos.info Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP archive plugin

, not two. But I digress. Unless I'm missing something, I don't see how having ASSP archive email is going to improve the spam filtering capabilities. It's unneeded and an waste of time IMHO. However, I'm not the one doing the coding so as long as I can shut it off, waste away! Cheers, Paul K

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: New features - new bugs

Is this a 'feature' that has been added since 1.5.x was announced stable? If so, why was it added?? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Thomas Eckardt/eck thomas.ecka...@thockar.com Reply-To: ASSP

Re: [Assp-test] About the penaltybox cleanup

Make sure you are checking the box under advanced the propogates all the permissions down. If that doens't work, run a file system check, remove all permissions, apply, then put them back on. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600

Re: [Assp-test] V 1.5.1.2 (1.0.0.1) bugs.

That was it. Thanks fritz. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:56:06 +0200

[Assp-test] V 1.5.1.2 (1.0.0.1) bugs.

showed as Œoff¹. I don¹t recall what specific thing I turned on, but I¹d assume they all reference one function anyway. Certainly no show stoppers.. Just an FYI. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399

[Assp-test] Attachment blocking not working at all.

virus¹s in zips are coming in. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 -- End of Forwarded Message -- Stay on top of everything new

Re: [Assp-test] Attachment blocking not working at all.

everyone to level 4 and completely clearing the level4 field so every attachment should be blocked.. Zip came in just fine.. Ugh.. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Paul K. Dickson pdick...@fredco-md.net

Re: [Assp-test] Attachment blocking not working at all.

Thanks for the suggestion. I didn't see anything. Just incase I change 1 parameter from the web interface, renamed assp.cfg to assp.cfg.bak and then hit apply right away from the web interface. The file was recreated in whole. Same behavior. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick

Re: [Assp-test] Attachment blocking not working at all.

Just tried. Same thing. Zip came in fine. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009

[Assp-test] Assp-user

Anyone else not getting mail from that list? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 -- ___ Assp

[Assp-test] FW: Error/spam corpus correction command.

Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 -- Forwarded Message From: Paul K. Dickson pdick...@fredco-md.net Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:15:06 -0400 To: For Users of ASSP assp-u...@lists.sourceforge.net Conversation

[Assp-test] DoFileScan

Is the point of that to enable scanning inside compressed files? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R

[Assp-test] 1.5.1 consensus?

Since Fritz posted the request to do a final test, has there been a consensus as to the stability of 1.5.1? Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399

Re: [Assp-test] SSL Module 1.5.1.0

Your perl install should have the command Œcpan¹ in it. Run that, then in the cpan console type ³install IO::Socket::SSL². The command is case sensitive. If asked, install any required dependencies. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net

Re: [Assp-test] version 1.5.1.0(0.05) and perl 5.8.6

He should be running the most recent and stable version of the 5.8 line, which is 5.8.8. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@fredco-md.net 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Tom Shaw ts...@oitc.com Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 1.4.3.0.11111342

Holy crap. I just noticed the version numbers coming up. Are you guys going for pie or something? :-D Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Paul Houlbrooke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ASSP development mailing

Re: [Assp-test] SNF4ASSP plugin

-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301-600-2399/x12399

[Assp-test] Test

test Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301-600-2399/x12399 - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux