Charles - this could be done with the ASSP_AFC plugin in V2. Without
the plugin a mail with a bad attachment is blocked - the plugin will
replace the bad attachments with a text part.
Including a download-link to a replaced bad attachment seems not to
be wise.
Or do you mean a feature like
Hi folks,
Further to the issues I posted last week, I have moved my backup server
from CentOS with perl v5.10 to Ubuntu with perl v5.12 and the threads
getting stuck issue has cleared up. The problem is therefore either in a
CentOS config or something to do with perl v5.10 as I have reapplied
Further developments on all of this.
Apparently turning off Wordstem does not solve the problem, it delays
the amount of time it takes to kick in and the severity. Instead of
rebuildspamdb being slow and high load from the start, it runs quickly
for a while and then goes slow. The load this
Thanks for the comments guys - replies below...
On 2012-02-09 3:16 AM, Grayhat gray...@gmx.net wrote:
Charles - this could be done with the ASSP_AFC plugin in V2. Without
the plugin a mail with a bad attachment is blocked - the plugin will
replace the bad attachments with a text part.
On 2012-02-09 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
This is exactly what I am interested in, and why. Basic testing on my
mailstore reveals that about 85% of the mail store is attachments, and
40-60% of that amount could be eliminated by deduplicating just the
attachments.
Hello,
I changed my mail server to a new Hardware/Software.
Now it is running Win2008R2 with plenty of ram and a fast harddisk
Everything works fine except this problems:
1) NoLoopSyswrite - write: 220 Ready to start TLS - 24 (stuck)
2) Assp destroyed my assp.cfg two times - after hitting
On 09/02/2012 12:48, Matti Haack wrote:
2) Assp destroyed my assp.cfg two times - after hitting apply it
showed me a bunch of messages that I have invalid values across the
whole setting pages. When I review the changes, most settings are
gone. Could ths be connected to chrome
Personally, since there will never be duplicate attachments, keeping
them forever (or at least for many years) shouldn't be a real
problem, and that is what I would do. The simplest way for those who
well... that fits your reality, but when it comes to a program (ASSP)
used in a number of
And of course, the other advantage is (assuming this feature would work
when sending messages too), people could send messages with large
attachments without worrying about whether the recipient could receive
it or not - like a seamless way to do the same thing that services like
Hi,
I have had some unusual requests.
A customer wants the block reports to run hourly due to the time
sensitive nature of some of the emails. I can set this up, but each
report covers a whole day so they are getting the same emails reported
every hour. I have tried using less than 1 value on
On 2012-02-09 8:08 AM, Daniel Urstöger dan...@gosi.at wrote:
I have haven´t really followed this discussion all the way,
but there is a open source mailstorage that does support single instance
storage for attachments:
dbmail. iirc it supports that since 2.3 and current version is 3.0.
Yeah,
Yeah, known about dbmail for a long time, but I just don't like the idea
of storing all email in a db... and I much prefer my dovecot
(performance is outstanding, especially as compared to courier-imap).
Well, whatever makes you happy. I have been using it since version 0.x
something,
have
On 2012-02-09 8:32 AM, Grayhat gray...@gmx.net wrote:
Personally, since there will never be duplicate attachments, keeping
them forever (or at least for many years) shouldn't be a real
problem, and that is what I would do. The simplest way for those who
well... that fits your reality, but
A customer wants the block reports to run hourly due to the time
sensitive nature of some of the emails.
Oh... you're referring to THAT kind of customer; I see, those which
feel lost if they don't receive their daily shot of junk email and
which don't even understand how the email works nor
Colin wrote:
Secondly, there is some confusion because we have two primary
mailservers. The user gets two separate reports
On my secondary MTA, I don't send block reports to the user at all.
You may want to consider that.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential
On 09/02/2012 14:27, Grayhat wrote:
A customer wants the block reports to run hourly due to the time
sensitive nature of some of the emails.
Oh... you're referring to THAT kind of customer; I see, those which
feel lost if they don't receive their daily shot of junk email and
which don't even
Thanks Thomas.
Question - if our users send through SMTP via ASSP and they want to request
a receipt for their outgoing mail, will this header be stripped?
Technically, it's outgoing mail, but does ASSP know the difference in this
case?
If the answer is that ASSP knows, then what would happen if
17 matches
Mail list logo
