Re: [Assp-user] URIBL failure question

2007-01-11 Thread Evan
Well I can close out my own mystery on this one. Failed to realize that ASSP only stores part of the failed message in the spam folder smacks self in head. So, the offending URL did, indeed, occur in the email message... but in the part that ASSP had discarded which is why I didn't see it in

Re: [Assp-user] URIBL failure question

2007-01-11 Thread Kevin
Evan wrote: Well I can close out my own mystery on this one. Failed to realize that ASSP only stores part of the failed message in the spam folder smacks self in head. So, the offending URL did, indeed, occur in the email message... but in the part that ASSP had discarded which is why I

Re: [Assp-user] URIBL failure question

2007-01-11 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Kevin wrote: Interesting. I didn't even think of that! I'll have to add that to the URIBL FAQ as I'm sure someone else will have this issue in the future. I think this should go into the generic FAQ. This can be applicable to most any form of blocking by ASSP where the spam is added to the

[Assp-user] URIBL failure question

2007-01-10 Thread Evan
I'm getting a URIBL failure Received-URIBL: fail (onlinebusinessshow.com.multi.surbl.org-127.0.0.16; ) where the domain listed in the logfile as the cause of the failure (which is indeed on a SURBL list), does NOT appear anywhere in the email itself. Is that even possible? This

Re: [Assp-user] URIBL failure question

2007-01-10 Thread Kevin
Evan wrote: I'm getting a URIBL failure Received-URIBL: fail (onlinebusinessshow.com.multi.surbl.org-127.0.0.16; ) where the domain listed in the logfile as the cause of the failure (which is indeed on a SURBL list), does NOT appear anywhere in the email itself. Is that even

Re: [Assp-user] URIBL failure question

2007-01-10 Thread Evan
Kevin wrote: Open the message in a text editor and check the source. Hi Kevin... I should have said up front, that I did that already. The reported failed URL onlinebusinessshow.com does not appear anywhere in the message source. If anybody wants to look at the source let me know and I'll be