[Assp-user] Your thoughts wanted:

2007-01-24 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
I am thinking of a major change in the GUI: removing the extra sections for collection, spamlover and testmode and putting that into the check section directly, eg. Testmode for Bayesian goes into Bayesian Option, RBL-spamlover goes to RBL. What do you think?

Re: [Assp-user] Your thoughts wanted:

2007-01-24 Thread Matti Haack
I think it would be good to simplyfy the GUI (I am always searching for something in the wrong tab...) But I think it is good to see any testmode in a single page. Maybe it should be in the beginning or completely at the end of the GUI as they are used during setup process, where the user

Re: [Assp-user] Your thoughts wanted:

2007-01-24 Thread TreeWalk
I am thinking of a major change in the GUI: removing the extra sections for collection, spamlover and testmode and putting that into the check section directly, eg. Testmode for Bayesian goes into Bayesian Option, RBL-spamlover goes to RBL. What do you think? Well .. I think that having

Re: [Assp-user] Your thoughts wanted:

2007-01-24 Thread Dickson, Paul
of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Your thoughts wanted: I think it would be good to simplyfy the GUI (I am always searching for something in the wrong tab...) But I think it is good to see any testmode in a single page. Maybe it should be in the beginning or completely

Re: [Assp-user] Your thoughts wanted:

2007-01-24 Thread Charles Marcus
removing the extra sections for collection, spamlover and testmode and putting that into the check section directly, eg. Testmode for Bayesian goes into Bayesian Option, RBL-spamlover goes to RBL. What do you think? Well .. I think that having all the testmode options in a single page

Re: [Assp-user] Your thoughts wanted:

2007-01-24 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
TreeWalk [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt: also.. a question; currently ASSP can fail SFP softfail I wonder if it may be possible to use softfail failures to just score the incoming message; that is; if the messages fails on softfail adding a spam score to it; all in all it's how softfail is supposed to