Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-25 Thread rnewton
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/ --- (Updated Feb. 25, 2015, 5:48 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-24 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14524 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Matt Jordan On Feb. 24, 2015, 7:20

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-24 Thread Joshua Colp
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14526 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Joshua Colp On Feb. 24, 2015, 1:20

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-24 Thread rnewton
On Feb. 20, 2015, 2:37 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/awesome/extensions.conf, lines 29-31 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/2/?file=71364#file71364line29 Is this comment correct still with this pattern match? Nope. Fixed. I also adjusted the

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-24 Thread rnewton
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/ --- (Updated Feb. 24, 2015, 1:20 p.m.) Review request for Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-20 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14511 --- /branches/13/configs/examples/awesome/extensions.conf

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-17 Thread rnewton
On Feb. 16, 2015, 10:59 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/awesome/logger.conf, line 5 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/2/?file=71366#file71366line5 Go with least to greatest: console = verbose,notice,warning,error That works. -

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-17 Thread rnewton
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14484 --- /branches/13/configs/examples/awesome/extensions.conf

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-17 Thread rnewton
On Feb. 16, 2015, 10:59 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/awesome/asterisk.conf, line 1 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/2/?file=71363#file71363line1 This isn't a template Yup. Oddly it is this way in the asterisk.conf.sample as well, and I'm not

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-17 Thread rmudgett
On Feb. 16, 2015, 4:59 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/awesome/asterisk.conf, line 1 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/2/?file=71363#file71363line1 This isn't a template rnewton wrote: Yup. Oddly it is this way in the asterisk.conf.sample as

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-16 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14470 --- /branches/13/configs/examples/awesome/asterisk.conf

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-12 Thread rnewton
On Jan. 29, 2015, 10:23 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, line 41 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line41 I'm curious why you elected to use MAC addresses as the endpoint names.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-12 Thread rnewton
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/ --- (Updated Feb. 13, 2015, 12:46 a.m.) Review request for Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-12 Thread rnewton
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14456 --- /branches/13/configs/examples/awesome/extensions.conf

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread rmudgett
On Jan. 27, 2015, 2:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42 I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer '=' in

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread Matt Jordan
On Jan. 27, 2015, 2:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42 I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer '=' in

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread Matt Jordan
On Jan. 29, 2015, 4:23 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, line 41 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line41 I'm curious why you elected to use MAC addresses as the endpoint names.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread George Joseph
On Jan. 27, 2015, 1:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42 I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer '=' in

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread rnewton
On Jan. 27, 2015, 8:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42 I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer '=' in

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread rnewton
On Jan. 30, 2015, 7:51 p.m., Paul Belanger wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 78 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line78 I prefer putting include statements at the top of the context.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread Steve Edwards
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, rnewton wrote: I used MAC addresses as that is what we use as an example in our security best practices document: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk/README-SERIOUSLY.bestpractices.txt?view=markup Perhaps this is a moot point. SAC's Asterisk system is behind NAT

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread Steve Edwards
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Paul Belanger wrote: I'd also prefer to see the first time always a naked NoOp() exten = 8000,1,NoOp() same = n,Verbose(1, blah) What value does noop() add? I start my contexts with exten = s,1, verbose(1,[${EXTEN}@${CONTEXT}!application

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread rnewton
On Jan. 30, 2015, 7:51 p.m., Paul Belanger wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/indications.conf, line 1 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71110#file71110line1 Again, this file seem to be the default. I'd rather see a symlink. rnewton

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-11 Thread George Joseph
On Jan. 27, 2015, 1:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42 I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer '=' in

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-05 Thread rnewton
On Jan. 29, 2015, 10:23 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, line 41 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line41 I'm curious why you elected to use MAC addresses as the endpoint names.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-05 Thread rnewton
On Jan. 27, 2015, 8:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, lines 24-30 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line24 I'd rename these to: auth-basic aor-basic

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-05 Thread rnewton
On Jan. 30, 2015, 1:13 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/modules.conf, line 41 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71112#file71112line41 Add format_pcm. This covers ulaw and g722 as well. On installation it's wise to

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-05 Thread rnewton
On Jan. 30, 2015, 7:51 p.m., Paul Belanger wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/README, line 2 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71107#file71107line2 maybe shorten directory name to awesome, or sae? Or, another option would be to

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-02-04 Thread rnewton
On Jan. 27, 2015, 8:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42 I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer '=' in

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-30 Thread Mark Michelson
On Jan. 29, 2015, 10:23 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, line 41 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line41 I'm curious why you elected to use MAC addresses as the endpoint names.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-30 Thread Paul Belanger
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14401 --- In general I like what you are doing. Some concerns on how

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-30 Thread Joshua Colp
On Jan. 29, 2015, 10:23 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, line 41 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line41 I'm curious why you elected to use MAC addresses as the endpoint names.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-30 Thread Joshua Colp
On Jan. 27, 2015, 8:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42 I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer '=' in

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-30 Thread Joshua Colp
On Jan. 29, 2015, 10:29 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, lines 72-75 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line72 Heh, I have one more comment and it's a real nitpicky thing.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-30 Thread Joshua Colp
On Jan. 29, 2015, 10:23 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, line 41 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line41 I'm curious why you elected to use MAC addresses as the endpoint names.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-30 Thread Joshua Colp
On Jan. 29, 2015, 10:29 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, lines 72-75 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line72 Heh, I have one more comment and it's a real nitpicky thing.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-30 Thread Joshua Colp
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14391 ---

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-29 Thread Mark Michelson
On Jan. 27, 2015, 8:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, lines 14-22 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line14 For the endpoint, I would also set: rtp_symmetric=yes

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-29 Thread Mark Michelson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14377 ---

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-29 Thread Mark Michelson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14378 ---

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-29 Thread George Joseph
On Jan. 29, 2015, 3:29 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, lines 72-75 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line72 Heh, I have one more comment and it's a real nitpicky thing.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-29 Thread Matt Jordan
On Jan. 29, 2015, 4:23 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote: /branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, line 41 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line41 I'm curious why you elected to use MAC addresses as the endpoint names.

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-27 Thread rnewton
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Repository: Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-27 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14320 ---

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4379: Example configuration scenario - Super Awesome Company: Phase 1 - Patch 1

2015-01-27 Thread George Joseph
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/#review14318 ---