On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 7:04 AM Nikša Baldun wrote:
> I understand, but autoservice and AGI wouldn't be running on the same
> channel at the same time. And I assume that once the transfer is completed,
> original AGI call will be terminated. If I am wrong in that assumption,
> then I am in
I understand, but autoservice and AGI wouldn't be running on the same channel
at the same time. And I assume that once the transfer is completed, original
AGI call will be terminated. If I am wrong in that assumption, then I am in
trouble.
It should be noted that, while you say that AGI can't
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 5:50 AM Nikša Baldun wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> thanks for the answer. Meanwhile, I've found that the debug message about
> competing threads happens because I am using Fast AGI, and two threads call
> AGI from the same channel. I assume this could potentially be resolved if
Hi Joshua,
thanks for the answer. Meanwhile, I've found that the debug message about
competing threads happens because I am using Fast AGI, and two threads call AGI
from the same channel. I assume this could potentially be resolved if I call
ast_app_exec_sub AFTER the attended transfer has
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:35 AM Nikša Baldun wrote:
> Hello,
>
> information available on channels involved in attended transfer is
> inadequate for my purposes, so I have created a function which sets some
> variables on these channels, and also runs transferee and transfer target
> through
