On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Matt for all the valuable details -- even quite some time since
your answer, I still have to digest parts of it, given that I had some
tough cold to deal with and then a bit of traveling. But that gave
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4411/
---
(Updated Feb. 11, 2015, 11:09 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4410/
---
(Updated Feb. 11, 2015, 11:04 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4399/
---
(Updated Feb. 11, 2015, 11:28 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4412/
---
(Updated Feb. 11, 2015, 10:46 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On 11 Feb 2015, at 17:50, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Matt for all the valuable details -- even quite some time since your
answer, I still have to digest parts of it, given that I had
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4409/
---
(Updated Feb. 11, 2015, 12:02 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Jan. 27, 2015, 2:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42
I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer
'=' in
On Jan. 27, 2015, 2:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42
I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer
'=' in
On Jan. 29, 2015, 4:23 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
/branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/pjsip.conf, line 41
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71114#file71114line41
I'm curious why you elected to use MAC addresses as the endpoint names.
On Jan. 27, 2015, 1:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42
I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer
'=' in
On Jan. 27, 2015, 8:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42
I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer
'=' in
On Feb. 10, 2015, 12:29 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
The only caveat here is that you may want to watch automated runs of the
SIP info_dtmf test to be sure that on awful hardware the 5 second Wait()
isn't too short for the test to complete. I suspect it will be okay though.
On a
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
Do you think it is doable? will such change be accepted? do you think
there can be a better way?
The problem you are always going to face when modifying app_queue is
ensuring that you haven't broken anything else.
On Jan. 30, 2015, 7:51 p.m., Paul Belanger wrote:
/branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 78
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line78
I prefer putting include statements at the top of the context.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4141/
---
(Updated Feb. 11, 2015, 9:38 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, rnewton wrote:
I used MAC addresses as that is what we use as an example in our
security best practices document:
http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk/README-SERIOUSLY.bestpractices.txt?view=markup
Perhaps this is a moot point. SAC's Asterisk system is behind NAT
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Paul Belanger wrote:
I'd also prefer to see the first time always a naked NoOp()
exten = 8000,1,NoOp()
same = n,Verbose(1, blah)
What value does noop() add?
I start my contexts with
exten = s,1,
verbose(1,[${EXTEN}@${CONTEXT}!application
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Leandro Dardini ldard...@gmail.com wrote:
I am back to try to fight with the problem highlighted few years ago
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-18480
In short, when using realtime queue members, it is impossible to use
ordered ringing method
On Jan. 30, 2015, 7:51 p.m., Paul Belanger wrote:
/branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/indications.conf, line 1
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71110#file71110line1
Again, this file seem to be the default. I'd rather see a symlink.
rnewton
On Jan. 27, 2015, 1:34 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
/branches/13/configs/examples/super_awesome_company/extensions.conf, line 42
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4379/diff/1/?file=71109#file71109line42
I know '=' is the same as '=', but I (for some reason) still prefer
'=' in
Given the case where asterisk has a single peer, such as a local
kamailio and multiple remote sip destinations, is it possible to
negotiate t38 both will remotes which specify redundancy in their
re-invites and with remotes which specify fec?
I was helping debug a case where the remote specified
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4414/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24727
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4415/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers and Mark Michelson.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4415/
---
(Updated Feb. 12, 2015, 12:34 a.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
25 matches
Mail list logo
