On Jan. 29, 2015, 8:22 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
If you run the Testsuite, you'll get a good indication of whether this is
truly backwards compatible.
gareth wrote:
I ran the test apps/queue/set_penalty which makes use of ami.command and
it failed.
However this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4489/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-24840
On March 12, 2015, 2:11 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
Regarding the remaining leak on the local optimize away test, if you do
find that it is a leak in Asterisk, please file an issue for it.
ASTERISK-24876 created.
- Corey
---
This
On March 12, 2015, 3:41 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
1. For this to go into Asterisk 13, tests will need to be provided that
cover the new parameter. (Really, those tests should be written regardless)
2. The CHANGES file will need to get updated with the new option.
rmudgett wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4473/
---
(Updated March 13, 2015, 12:13 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On March 12, 2015, 3:41 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
1. For this to go into Asterisk 13, tests will need to be provided that
cover the new parameter. (Really, those tests should be written regardless)
2. The CHANGES file will need to get updated with the new option.
rmudgett wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4189/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4489/#review14685
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
branches/13/include/asterisk/res_pjsip.h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4488/#review14688
---
/branches/13/configs/basic-pbx/extensions.conf
On March 12, 2015, 3:41 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
1. For this to go into Asterisk 13, tests will need to be provided that
cover the new parameter. (Really, those tests should be written regardless)
2. The CHANGES file will need to get updated with the new option.
rmudgett wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4473/#review14690
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- gareth
On March 13, 2015, 5:13 p.m.,
On March 12, 2015, 8:41 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote:
1. For this to go into Asterisk 13, tests will need to be provided that
cover the new parameter. (Really, those tests should be written regardless)
2. The CHANGES file will need to get updated with the new option.
rmudgett wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4487/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4488/
---
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Repository: Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4488/#review14676
---
/branches/13/configs/basic-pbx/extensions.conf
On March 11, 2015, 6:05 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
/trunk/include/asterisk/dns_recurring.h, line 48
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4474/diff/1/?file=71969#file71969line48
Since DNS resolution can take time, should the next refresh interval be
set in advance of the lowest returned
On March 10, 2015, 1:26 p.m., Ed Hynan wrote:
/trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c, line 240
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/diff/1/?file=71888#file71888line240
Portability: at least EVFILT_USER and NOTE_TRIGGER are not defined on
all kqueue(2) systems.
Justin T. Gibbs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4470/
---
(Updated March 13, 2015, 10:43 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4487/#review14678
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- rmudgett
On March 13, 2015, 2:28 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4462/#review14679
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Joshua Colp
On March 6, 2015, 9:02
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4474/
---
(Updated March 13, 2015, 4:04 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4471/#review14681
---
Ship it!
Besides the memory leak I accidentally gave you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4484/
---
(Updated March 13, 2015, 10:57 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4471/#review14680
---
These tests don't currently release their reference to the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4472/
---
(Updated March 13, 2015, 11:26 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4487/
---
(Updated March 13, 2015, 12:05 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
26 matches
Mail list logo
