Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-27 Thread Matt Jordan
On March 23, 2015, 9:57 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote: Ship It! As an addendum to this, this patch does not merge cleanly on Asterisk 11. As such, I'll be merging this to Asterisk 13+. Alas, as I don't run a system that can compile kqueue, it's kind of hard for me to backport that. If someone

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-27 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/ --- (Updated March 27, 2015, 9:41 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-23 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/#review14766 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Matt Jordan On March 18, 2015, 11:44

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-18 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/ --- (Updated March 18, 2015, 4:44 p.m.) Review request for Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-18 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
On March 16, 2015, 3:18 a.m., Matt Jordan wrote: /trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c, lines 76-83 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/diff/2/?file=72098#file72098line76 For structure packing, you may want to declare this as: struct kqueue_timer { int handle;

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-15 Thread Matt Jordan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/#review14696 --- Thanks for the patch - there's a few other kqueue related

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-14 Thread Ed Hynan
On March 10, 2015, 1:26 p.m., Ed Hynan wrote: /trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c, line 240 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/diff/1/?file=71888#file71888line240 Portability: at least EVFILT_USER and NOTE_TRIGGER are not defined on all kqueue(2) systems. Justin T. Gibbs

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-13 Thread Ed Hynan
On March 10, 2015, 1:26 p.m., Ed Hynan wrote: /trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c, line 240 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/diff/1/?file=71888#file71888line240 Portability: at least EVFILT_USER and NOTE_TRIGGER are not defined on all kqueue(2) systems. Justin T. Gibbs

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-12 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/ --- (Updated March 13, 2015, 2:07 a.m.) Review request for Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-12 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
On March 10, 2015, 1:26 p.m., Ed Hynan wrote: /trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c, line 240 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/diff/1/?file=71888#file71888line240 Portability: at least EVFILT_USER and NOTE_TRIGGER are not defined on all kqueue(2) systems. Justin T. Gibbs

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-11 Thread Ed Hynan
On March 10, 2015, 1:26 p.m., Ed Hynan wrote: /trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c, line 240 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/diff/1/?file=71888#file71888line240 Portability: at least EVFILT_USER and NOTE_TRIGGER are not defined on all kqueue(2) systems. Justin T. Gibbs

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-10 Thread Joshua Colp
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/#review14620 --- My immediate question for this is: How does this impact OSX?

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-10 Thread Ed Hynan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/#review14623 --- /trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-10 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
On March 10, 2015, 1:26 p.m., Ed Hynan wrote: /trunk/res/res_timing_kqueue.c, line 240 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/diff/1/?file=71888#file71888line240 Portability: at least EVFILT_USER and NOTE_TRIGGER are not defined on all kqueue(2) systems. Which platforms are you

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-10 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
On March 10, 2015, 1:08 p.m., Joshua Colp wrote: My immediate question for this is: How does this impact OSX? The timing module was originally written for both, do these changes work for both? I haven't tested against OS-X, but it has had EVFILT_USER support since 10.6. - Justin

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 4465: Update the kqueue timing module to conform to current timer API.

2015-03-09 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4465/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers. Repository: Asterisk