On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:26:45AM +, Paul Hayes wrote:
The SPA-2100 is the only one to support T.38 at the moment though. SPA-2002
has the ability to support t.38 (i.e. it has the processing power required)
but
the firmware support isn't there yet.
Per our sales contact at Cisco for
The SPA-2100 is the only one to support T.38 at the moment though.
SPA-2002 has the ability to support t.38 (i.e. it has the processing
power required) but the firmware support isn't there yet.
C F wrote:
On 3/11/06, Kristian Kielhofner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olle E Johansson
Olle E Johansson wrote:
11 mar 2006 kl. 23.44 skrev George Pajari:
*** ITU T.38 -- Fax over VoIP
It's not clear from the bug tracker if the problem with a T.38
endpoint (say ATA) behind NAT is working yet (with sip.conf
specifying nat=yes/qualify=yes). Is this working or do both T.38
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:26 +, Paul Hayes wrote:
The SPA-2100 is the only one to support T.38 at the moment though.
SPA-2002 has the ability to support t.38 (i.e. it has the processing
power required) but the firmware support isn't there yet.
Any info on the SPA-3000 and t.38 support?
The sipura 2100 does work good with a AS5300
Zoa wrote:
Does anybody know what devices really support t.38 ? I've seen a few
claiming they do on the box, but most do not seem to support it at all.
Zoa.
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
Olle E Johansson wrote:
Friends in the Asterisk.org
11 mar 2006 kl. 23.44 skrev George Pajari:
*** ITU T.38 -- Fax over VoIP
It's not clear from the bug tracker if the problem with a T.38
endpoint (say ATA) behind NAT is working yet (with sip.conf
specifying nat=yes/qualify=yes). Is this working or do both T.38
endpoints have to have
Really interesting Olle
We are expecting :)
Miguel escribió:
Olle E Johansson wrote:
Asterisk won't be an T.38 endpoint, but will handle T.38 calls
properly, regardless
if the T.38 was offered in the original call setup, or if the caller
suddenly sends a fax
in the middle of a call (a
Hi,
yes, i do believe that T38 on Asterisk is a huge step! I've red about
propriatery solutions with it , i was just wondering when Asterisk
would get it.
This project is just perfect, every day keeping in track with every one needs.
Tthank you for your excellent work Steve Underwood!
Best
Olle E Johansson wrote:
Friends in the Asterisk.org community,
There is a lot of cool stuff going on in Asterisk development, things
that will change Asterisk and
make it work better in your organisation, make it easier to sell in
your area or give you more
consulting oppurtunities - in
Does anybody know what devices really support t.38 ? I've seen a few
claiming they do on the box, but most do not seem to support it at all.
Zoa.
Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
Olle E Johansson wrote:
Friends in the Asterisk.org community,
There is a lot of cool stuff going on in Asterisk
*** ITU T.38 -- Fax over VoIP
It's not clear from the bug tracker if the problem with a T.38 endpoint
(say ATA) behind NAT is working yet (with sip.conf specifying
nat=yes/qualify=yes). Is this working or do both T.38 endpoints have to
have public routable IP addresses still?
g.
--
On 3/11/06, Kristian Kielhofner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olle E Johansson wrote:
Friends in the Asterisk.org community,
There is a lot of cool stuff going on in Asterisk development, things
that will change Asterisk and
make it work better in your organisation, make it easier to sell in
Friends in the Asterisk.org community,
There is a lot of cool stuff going on in Asterisk development, things
that will change Asterisk and
make it work better in your organisation, make it easier to sell in
your area or give you more
consulting oppurtunities - in short, functionality that
Olle E Johansson wrote:
Asterisk won't be an T.38 endpoint, but will handle T.38 calls
properly, regardless
if the T.38 was offered in the original call setup, or if the caller
suddenly sends a fax
in the middle of a call (a re-invite). The requirement is that the
incoming channel
and the
14 matches
Mail list logo
