Re: Ringing problems was [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-20 Thread David Josephson
Rich Adamson responded to an earlier reply (not from me) Eric, those links have nothing to do with his stated problem. The problem is 105v AC on the pstn line when on-hook and no ringing. No, he says the issue is about ringing and strange voltages on his Digium TDM400 FXS ports, not the PSTN

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread David Brodbeck
-Original Message- From: Rich Adamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] As far as the issue with DC voltage on the POTS line only being 43.8 DC, my guess was that is just an issue with voltage drop on the line because of distance between me and the CO. No possible way. If

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread Ian Pattison
I don't know how everyone else is doing but my woes are continuing. Hardware: Digium TDM400P (REV G according to the silk screening on the board) 2xFX0, 2xFXS purchased in August/September 2004 Dell Precision 420 (PIII-733, 512MB RAM nothing fancy but not doing too much either) Software:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread Eric Wieling aka ManxPower
So the only thing you have not done is tried the cards in a different system with a different motherboard. It is WELL KNOWN that the cards will not work well if they are shareing interrupts with another device. Ian Pattison wrote: I don't know how everyone else is doing but my woes are

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On April 18, 2005 02:07 pm, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: So the only thing you have not done is tried the cards in a different system with a different motherboard. It is WELL KNOWN that the cards will not work well if they are shareing interrupts with another device. While this is true,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread Rich Adamson
On April 18, 2005 02:07 pm, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: So the only thing you have not done is tried the cards in a different system with a different motherboard. It is WELL KNOWN that the cards will not work well if they are shareing interrupts with another device. While this is

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread Robert Webb
See inline responses... On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:43:30 -0400 Ian Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know how everyone else is doing but my woes are continuing. Hardware: Digium TDM400P (REV G according to the silk screening on the board) 2xFX0, 2xFXS purchased in August/September 2004

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread Julian J. M.
Hello, In FC3, i had to set wctdm options in /etc/modprobe.conf (it may be modules.conf in other distros): options wctdm boostringer=1 debug=1 Julian J. M. On 4/18/05, Ian Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Low ringing voltage still (~44V AC). I have used the boostringer=1 option when

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread Ian Pattison
Ok... here's my module loading process... am I missing something? modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxs boostringer=1 (btw: this one takes about 5 seconds. The others are almost instant) modprobe wcfxo ztcfg -vv This is correct is it not? Robert Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18/04/2005 16:06 See inline

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread Ian Pattison
I don't know how everyone else is doing but my woes are continuing. I'm really starting to dislike these Digium cards. Hardware: Digium TDM400P (REV G according to the silk screening on the board) 2xFX0, 2xFXS purchased in August/September 2004 Dell Precision 420 (PIII-733, 512MB RAM nothing

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-18 Thread Neal Walton
-Users] TDM400P Revision question. I don't know how everyone else is doing but my woes are continuing. I'm really starting to dislike these Digium cards. Hardware: Digium TDM400P (REV G according to the silk screening on the board) 2xFX0, 2xFXS purchased in August/September 2004 Dell Precision 420

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-15 Thread Rich Adamson
My specific issue has to do with ringing on my FXS ports. A Northen Telecom Harmony phone (circa 1983) rings normally but when I connect my newer GE 2.4GHz cordless I never get more than 1/2 ring (it lights up and works fine... just can't get a ring from it). Normally I'd assume that

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-15 Thread Eric Wieling
Rich Adamson wrote: My specific issue has to do with ringing on my FXS ports. A Northen Telecom Harmony phone (circa 1983) rings normally but when I connect my newer GE 2.4GHz cordless I never get more than 1/2 ring (it lights up and works fine... just can't get a ring from it). Normally I'd

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-15 Thread Rich Adamson
My specific issue has to do with ringing on my FXS ports. A Northen Telecom Harmony phone (circa 1983) rings normally but when I connect my newer GE 2.4GHz cordless I never get more than 1/2 ring (it lights up and works fine... just can't get a ring from it). Normally I'd

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-15 Thread Eric Wieling
Rich Adamson wrote: My specific issue has to do with ringing on my FXS ports. A Northen Telecom Harmony phone (circa 1983) rings normally but when I connect my newer GE 2.4GHz cordless I never get more than 1/2 ring (it lights up and works fine... just can't get a ring from it). Normally I'd

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-14 Thread Rich Adamson
I was following a discussion on this list about the TDM400P revisions. It is my understanding that the current revision that one should have is the Rev. H and not the E/F. I have not yet been able to verify the rev stamped on the board, but zaptel is reporting that I have

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-14 Thread Robert Webb
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:14:37 -0600 Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was following a discussion on this list about the TDM400P revisions. It is my understanding that the current revision that one should have is the Rev. H and not the E/F. I have not yet been able to verify

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-14 Thread Rich Adamson
I was following a discussion on this list about the TDM400P revisions. It is my understanding that the current revision that one should have is the Rev. H and not the E/F. I have not yet been able to verify the rev stamped on the board, but zaptel is reporting

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-14 Thread Robert Webb
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:59:11 -0600 Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was following a discussion on this list about the TDM400P revisions. It is my understanding that the current revision that one should have is the Rev. H and not the E/F. I have not yet been able to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-14 Thread Robert Webb
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:45:44 -0400 Ian Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My specific issue has to do with ringing on my FXS ports. A Northen Telecom Harmony phone (circa 1983) rings normally but when I connect my newer GE 2.4GHz cordless I never get more than 1/2 ring (it lights up and works

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-14 Thread Ian Pattison
My specific issue has to do with ringing on my FXS ports. A Northen Telecom Harmony phone (circa 1983) rings normally but when I connect my newer GE 2.4GHz cordless I never get more than 1/2 ring (it lights up and works fine... just can't get a ring from it). Normally I'd assume that it's a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-14 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
PLEASE!! trim these replies!!! -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-13 Thread Robert Webb
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:54:30 -0400 Robert Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good morning all.. I was following a discussion on this list about the TDM400P revisions. It is my understanding that the current revision that one should have is the Rev. H and not the E/F. I have not yet

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Revision question.

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Webb
Sorry for the initial no subject line. Was in a hurry when I typed this and somehow missed putting it in. Please accept my apologies On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:54:30 -0400 Robert Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good morning all.. I was following a discussion on this list about the TDM400P