_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of vip killa
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:11 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] REFER and dialplan broken (as
I did not see this issue anywhere on issues.asterisk.org
Can you give me a reference number to the issue? Also, it is a problem with
all releases of asterisk.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote:
--
*From:*
Mea Culpa - I see this in my 1.4.37 source as well (line 8401 in this
release chan_sip.c). Hopefully someone like Tilghman will address this; a
simple hack would be to create a C daemon that did a core show channels
and transmit to appropriate results back for referral.
_
From:
Have you read this thread?
http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?t=74418
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of vip killa
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:36 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Interesting but the issue I'm having relates to Inbound and Outbound REFERs
since I'm using Polycom's Transfer softkey (which allows for both Inbound
and Outbound Transfers). I know this is not an issue when using Asterisk's
built-in transfer (only allows Inbound transfers).
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011
I use Polycom 501's and use the Transfer Key to send inbound calls to other
extensions. Can you give me an A-B-C example of how this problem manifests
itself?
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of vip killa
Sent:
Sure, it really manifests itself whenever using AGI for call flow, but this
is how it affects us...
incoming call - queue - agent007 - xfer - pussygalore
now the AGI/dialplan thinks agent007 is on phone with pussygalore until that
xfered call terminates so if another call comes into queue while
Do you use the Queue command natively or from the AGI? In the example you
gave, if you did a core show channels, I assume that Agent007 would be
idle, but ineligible for Queue activity.
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com]
I'm sorry i don't know what you mean by natively. I'm almost certain the
queue is handled via AGI and not using asterisk's queue.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote:
Do you use the Queue command “natively” or from the AGI? In the example
you gave, if you
My bad - natively means using the Queue command from the dialplan. Since
the powers that be are aware of this problem, I suppose it will get fixed
when somebody either has some spare time or a sufficient bounty is offered.
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
Yes, they want money, they've told me that several times...it's unfortunate
that asterisk's dev community is not in it to make a good product but a
profit
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote:
My bad – “natively” means using the Queue command from the
Un-top-posting...
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com
wrote:
My bad – “natively” means using the Queue command from the dialplan.
Since the “powers that be” are aware of this problem, I suppose it will
get fixed when somebody either has some spare time or a
Implying that the Asterisk developers (which is itself a fairly nebulous
statement since those who contribute to Asterisk are many and come from
different companies/countries/etc.) are not in it to make a good product but
to make a profit is not only highly insulting but a complete
It's simple, if a product is broken shouldn't it be fixed? In this case the
answer is for a price which is absurd because it is an open source
product. If there was a decent community of developers surrounding this
open source project, it would be fixed simply because it's broken, no
questions
snip
Asterisk is (IMO) a very good product. It is NOT a perfect product, but I'm
sure that most if not all of the Commercial PBX products available are not
either. You get what you pay for; In this case, you pay in time instead of
actual cash (unless you use the commercial flavor of Asterisk).
Actually from what I understand Asterisk is the only product that has this
REFER problem. I know for a fact FreeSWITCH (open-source) handles REFERs
fine.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote:
snip
Asterisk is (IMO) a very good product. It is NOT a perfect
You are still focusing on ONE of the choices given when that isn't your only
option. It is simply untrue to say that the answer to it's broken was pay
us. You were (now on multiple occasions) told how it would come to pass that
a resolution will come about. You choose to ignore precisely
I recognize all the options given yet as I explained before they are not
viable. I do not have the resources to pay someone, I do not have the
expertise to fix this issue because according to an asterisk developer any
fix in that area would be deeply architectural in nature... what other
options
Sorry for the top post - this is from my phone.
Sounds like the issue may actually be with the AGI that is handling your ACD
queue. I've used the built-in Queue() command to handle situations like you
describe without running into the issues you detailed. And that's with Polycom
phones, too.
On 02/23/2011 12:43 PM, vip killa wrote:
I recognize all the options given yet as I explained before they are not viable.
I do not have the resources to pay someone, I do not have the expertise to fix
this issue because according to an asterisk developer any fix in that area
would be deeply
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of vip killa
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:44 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] REFER and dialplan broken (as
I recognize all the options given yet as I explained before they are not
viable. I do not have the resources to pay someone, I do not have the
expertise to fix this issue because according to an asterisk developer
any fix in that area would be deeply architectural in nature... what
other
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Danny Nicholas wrote:
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
I've exhausted every option without paying someone to fix this, so asterisk
might as well be commercial software.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com wrote:
I recognize all the options given yet as I explained before they are not
viable. I do not have the
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, vip killa wrote:
I've exhausted every option without paying someone to fix this, so
asterisk might as well be commercial software.
You 'effing' kill me :)
You have to be a troll. You can't be this stupid.
--
Thanks in advance,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:43 PM, vip killa vipki...@gmail.com wrote:
I've exhausted every option without paying someone to fix this, so asterisk
might as well be commercial software.
If you're really interested in trying to resolve your issue, as opposed to
just complaining about it, perhaps
26 matches
Mail list logo
