Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-04-24 Thread FaberK
Hi Folks,using this:exten = x,1,Playback(audio,noanswer)exten = x,2,Answerexten = x,3,BackGround(out)exten = x,103,HangupI'm not billed and remain connected, but the file 'audio' is not played...well I do not ear it. But after, it pass correctly to answer and I can

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-04-24 Thread Peter J Dean
You need to have an established and open channel before the audio can be played. exten = x,1,Answer exten = x,n,Playback(audio,noanswer) exten = x,n,BackGround(out) exten = x,n,Hangup On 24/04/2006, at 10:25 PM, FaberK wrote: Hi Folks, using this: exten =

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-04-24 Thread FaberK
Hi Peter,but if I Answer, I'll be billed, isn't it?What I need is to play an announce of the service cost, so that if the guest do not want to go ahead for the cost, can hungup without pay.I'll try your solution. Thanks.2006/4/25, Peter J Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You need to have an established and

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-04-24 Thread FaberK
I've just tryed and I've been billed.No other ideas???I'm still searching.2006/4/25, FaberK [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Peter,but if I Answer, I'll be billed, isn't it?What I need is to play an announce of the service cost, so that if the guest do not want to go ahead for the cost, can hungup without

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-04-24 Thread Peter J Dean
You are stilling going to need to answer the call before you can play any message or music or other. Here is a start for you. So lets look at it logically; - Advise the caller of the charges and conditions. - The caller must has a option to acknowledge they understand and accept the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-04-24 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Peter J Dean wrote: You are stilling going to need to answer the call before you can play any message or music or other. That is not necessarily true. On PRI circuits, you can usually play 'early audio' towards the caller for some period of time. ___

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-04-24 Thread FaberK
I know that, but as soon as I answer, guest is billed.Sorry to trouble you.Thanks2006/4/25, Peter J Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] :You are stilling going to need to answer the call before you can playany message or music or other. Here is a start for you.So lets look at it logically;- Advise the caller

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-03-21 Thread FaberK
Hi,I've tryed it using my mobile and I've been charged.Maybe, my mobile operator(Vodafone) does not support it?Thanks again.p.s.: hi John, I love to learn(books, google, lists, ecc...) and cooperation and I can say that everytime I learn something new. :o) 2006/3/21, CC Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Not

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-03-20 Thread John Daragon
FaberK wrote: Hi guys, maybe youìve got the answer...! When a caller(not internal, but from PSTN) call *, I need to let him hear a message, before * answer and the bill start running. If is not clear, just let me know. caller-telco(telco bill to the caller as soon as * answer)-asterisk

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-03-20 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Monday 20 March 2006 11:46, John Daragon wrote: Alas, most (if not all) telcos object to you transmitting voice over their circuits before they've started to charge you for the call. Incorrect. I do this all the time with a PRI. You can't do this with POTS. Simply don't Answer() until

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-03-20 Thread FaberK
Thanks a lot!!! Is exactly what I need to do. Send a message, before answer. Thanks to all! F.2006/3/20, Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Monday 20 March 2006 11:46, John Daragon wrote: Alas, most (if not all) telcos object to you transmitting voice over their circuits before they've

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-03-20 Thread John Daragon
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Monday 20 March 2006 11:46, John Daragon wrote: Alas, most (if not all) telcos object to you transmitting voice over their circuits before they've started to charge you for the call. Incorrect. I do this all the time with a PRI. You can't do this with POTS.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-03-20 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Monday 20 March 2006 13:49, John Daragon wrote: Hell, you learn something new every short period of time. I have to go try this out... :-) It's called early audio in PRI parlance, some carriers do not offer it but almost all do. -A. ___

RE: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-03-20 Thread Nabeel Jafferali
On Monday 20 March 2006 13:49, John Daragon wrote: Hell, you learn something new every short period of time. I have to go try this out... :-) It's called early audio in PRI parlance, some carriers do not offer it but almost all do. Always pisses me off when I call AmEx at 1-800-297-1000

Re: [Asterisk-Users] answer delay

2006-03-20 Thread CC Jay
Not sure about 1.2.4 but with 1.0.9, you'll need to add noanswer to playback since playback will try to answer the line, i.e.,exten = 5551234,1,Playback(you-wont-be-billed-for-hearing-this, noanswer) exten = 5551234,n,Answeretc. ___ --Bandwidth and

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answer Delay

2005-06-07 Thread Joshua Colp
Hello, The problem with analog lines is that there is no reliable way to determine whether the line was actually answered or not, thus without the highly experimental callprogress option your FXO ports will always show up as being answered immediately when they are used. As for changing the

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answer Delay

2005-06-07 Thread Oswaldo Arratia
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Colp Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:02 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answer Delay Hello, The problem with analog lines is that there is no reliable way to determine

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answer Delay

2005-06-07 Thread Joshua Colp
: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:41 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answer Delay Yes, I know that is the problem with analog lines that is why I chose the option of the fixed time delay answer. I've tried to modify the source code in chan_zap.c

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answer Delay

2005-06-07 Thread Oswaldo Arratia
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:41 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Answer Delay Yes, I know that is the problem with analog lines that is why I chose the option of the fixed time delay answer. I've tried to modify the source code