CallManager uses Cisco's own SCCP aka Skinny Protocol, not H323.
Asterisk has two SCCP channel drivers available. One is included with
Asterisk, one is available for download from somewhere (check the
mailing list archives). I don't know if they work with CallManager or
now, I *think* they were
Eric Wieling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
CallManager uses Cisco's own SCCP aka Skinny Protocol, not H323.
Asterisk has two SCCP channel drivers available. One is included with
Asterisk, one is available for download from somewhere (check the
mailing list archives). I don't know if they work
is coming soon. There are NO sccp-based gateways,
from Cisco
anyways.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Eric Wieling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 6:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: current version
CallManager uses Cisco's own SCCP aka
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Austin
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: current version
To be clear I meant using Chan)_h323 with Call Manager where CM is
configured
with * as a H.323
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] capacity testing
I tried to use it to create a trunk
to Ciscos call manager. The 0.7.1 code worked up to a point.
The call would be established, but audio
was one-way from the Call Manager. Asterisk with
Chan_h323 would not setup the sending rtp
stream. The
You can't use chan_h323 with call manager.
bkw
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Dan Austin wrote:
I tried to use it to create a 'trunk' to Cisco's call manager. The
0.7.1 code worked up to a point.
The call would be established, but audio was one-way from the Call
Manager. Asterisk with
Chan_h323
Will the other chan_oh323 work?
Quoting Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You can't use chan_h323 with call manager.
bkw
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Dan Austin wrote:
I tried to use it to create a 'trunk' to Cisco's call manager. The
0.7.1 code worked up to a point.
The call would be
Will either of the h323 channels work with gatekeepers properly? Ie,
reregister through * reloads and such? I've had problems with chan_h323 in
this regard. Chan_h323 will register fine with a gnugk first time around. But
after a reload, it loses its connection. Or should I try downloading
