Holger Schurig wrote:
Unless someone does something serious about the flakiness of libtiff, I
don't think either spandsp or Hylafax will ever be very stable. :-(
Delete the word unless.
And then create a subdirectory spandsp/tiff where you put a libtiff into
it that actually works. Create
On Monday 21 June 2004 11:02, Steve Underwood wrote:
That isn't what I meant. libtiff is really flaky when you give it a bad
tiff file. It used to core dump on almost any fault. I fed updates back
to the libtiff guys a few years ago, which I think went in. Others must
have contributed most
Lee Howard wrote:
I've never seen this kind of flakiness of libtiff cause any problems
for HylaFAX. As far as I'm aware, there has only been two instances
when libtiff caused HylaFAX any grief. The 3.6.1 release problem with
G3/G4 is a given. And then there was the 16-to-32 bit type change
It doesn't matter what facilities you use. If you get libtiff to open a
bad TIFF file, it may well dump core. TIFF has been one of the most
abused standards over the years. It used to be that hardly any FAX
software would read the TIFFs produced by another package - both because
they were
We would think about having 2 servers :
Server A : Asterisk
PRI card (Digium TE410P)
Server B : Fax server
PRI card (Eicon PRI30M)
Call --- TE410P/1 --- Asterisk Extension ---
Voice ? --- Voicemail or Dial
Fax ?--- TE410P/2 crossover
i'dd like to but is it stable enough for production (receiving over 500 faxes a day ?)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Klaus-Peter
Junghanns
Sent: vrijdag 18 juni 2004 13:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P / Eicon
i'dd like to but is it stable enough for production (receiving over 500 faxes a day
?)
i think it is. at least i know someone who is using it in production on
a Digium E1 card.
If everything else fails you can buy that eicon card later on in the
worst case.
best regards
Klaus
--
: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P / Eicon PRI
save 10k EUR and use spandDSP (www.opencall.org) for fax instead of
the
second server with the Eicon PRI card.
Michael
best regards
Klaus
--
Klaus-Peter Junghanns
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
better send the EUR 10k (not $10k... :) ) to the author of spandDSP.
Nobody needs HylaFAX for receiving faxes. Converting a tiff to pdf and
storing it somewhere is not rocket science. ;)
best regards
Klaus
Am Fr, 2004-06-18 um 17.08 schrieb Lee Howard:
If you would rather use HylaFAX instead
On Friday 18 June 2004 11:08, Lee Howard wrote:
If you would rather use HylaFAX instead of spandsp and have $10K to
throw around, then may I suggest hiring an Asterisk channel author to
write a T.38-supporting channel driver? That way you could just use
t38modem with HylaFAX, and you wouldn't
You don't even need spandsp - fax is dead, remember? ;-)
-d
- Original Message -
From: Klaus-Peter Junghanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P / Eicon PRI
better send the EUR 10k (not $10k
On Friday 18 June 2004 11:10, Klaus-Peter Junghanns wrote:
better send the EUR 10k (not $10k... :) ) to the author of spandDSP.
Nobody needs HylaFAX for receiving faxes. Converting a tiff to pdf and
storing it somewhere is not rocket science. ;)
Incorrect. I've been unable to get spandsp
Am Fr, 2004-06-18 um 17.53 schrieb Darren Nickerson:
You don't even need spandsp - fax is dead, remember? ;-)
Why do YOU sell hylafax servers then? ;)
best regards
Klaus
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Friday 18 June 2004 11:10, Klaus-Peter Junghanns wrote:
better send the EUR 10k (not $10k... :) ) to the author of spandDSP.
Nobody needs HylaFAX for receiving faxes. Converting a tiff to pdf and
storing it somewhere is not rocket science. ;)
Incorrect. I've
On 2004.06.18 08:34 Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Friday 18 June 2004 11:08, Lee Howard wrote:
If you would rather use HylaFAX instead of spandsp and have $10K to
throw around, then may I suggest hiring an Asterisk channel author
to
write a T.38-supporting channel driver? That way you could just
Klaus-Peter Junghanns wrote:
Am Fr, 2004-06-18 um 17.53 schrieb Darren Nickerson:
You don't even need spandsp - fax is dead, remember? ;-)
Why do YOU sell hylafax servers then? ;)
best regards
Klaus
Working with the dead never stopped undertakers making a living :-)
Regards,
Steve
On 2004.06.18 08:10 Klaus-Peter Junghanns wrote:
better send the EUR 10k (not $10k... :) ) to the author of spandDSP.
Nobody needs HylaFAX for receiving faxes.
Firstly, I'm not just talking about receiving faxes.
If my choices are between HylaFAX and spandsp and if I want outbound
queueing and a
On Friday 18 June 2004 12:37, Steve Underwood wrote:
The segfaults I have followed up on have all been due to libtiff
versions. Are you sure there isn't some other version of libtiff lurking
on your machine? If there isn't I would like to follow up with you and
find why this happens. Many
- Original Message -
From: Klaus-Peter Junghanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P / Eicon PRI
Am Fr, 2004-06-18 um 17.53 schrieb Darren Nickerson:
You don't even need spandsp - fax is dead, remember
On Friday 18 June 2004 13:20, Lee Howard wrote:
Well, if you don't like t38modem, then a really cool thing would be if
you wrote a T.38 driver for HylaFAX also. So then Asterisk and HylaFAX
could play together without t38modem, without the AT command-response
language limitations.
I wasn't
Am Fr, 2004-06-18 um 19.56 schrieb Lee Howard:
Firstly, I'm not just talking about receiving faxes.
If my choices are between HylaFAX and spandsp and if I want outbound
queueing and a client-server interface for networked usage, then
spandsp will not cut it alone.
So yes, anyone who
Furthermore, even if you assumed that spandsp was as stable as HylaFAX,
there is a vast feature-set difference between them as far as the
faxing itself goes. Steve has already made it clear that he sees no
future in fax, and that he does not intend to bridge that feature-set
gap at all.
Citat Klaus-Peter Junghanns [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Fr, 2004-06-18 um 19.56 schrieb Lee Howard:
Firstly, I'm not just talking about receiving faxes.
If my choices are between HylaFAX and spandsp and if I want outbound
queueing and a client-server interface for networked usage, then
Lee Howard wrote:
Furthermore, even if you assumed that spandsp was as stable as
HylaFAX, there is a vast feature-set difference between them as far as
the faxing itself goes. Steve has already made it clear that he sees
no future in fax, and that he does not intend to bridge that
feature-set
On 2004.06.18 20:02 Steve Underwood wrote:
Lee Howard wrote:
So, show me a T.38 channel driver for Asterisk. And if you think
that using t38modem is ugly, then show me a T.38 driver for HylaFAX.
I really want to see spandsp talking through T.38 across the
internet. T.38 and fax to/from e-mail
25 matches
Mail list logo
