Re: [asterisk-users] How to have callers not being billed when in waiting queue ? [SOLVED]

Hi, Just trying to figure out how is this solved ? by involving multiple telcos in the loop and asking them to not charge based on 200 OK/Answer!? As far as I know people have designed Queue/CallCenter platforms who upon entering a number in queue just state them their number in queue and approx

Re: [asterisk-users] How to have callers not being billed when in waiting queue ? [SOLVED]

In most instances the company being called is not charging the caller for their phone serves. That is the callers service provider, and once the answer is issued the call is up. This only makes senses if the company being called is providing services and charging a per min rate for that

[asterisk-users] ConfBridge function slight change from 11 to 13

Hi, I have been using ConfBridge since Asterisk 11, and I recently upgraded a server to 13. While everything that needed fixing seems fixed, I have an issue that does not seem documented anywhere. The way I used ConfBridge is that I have a standard bridge profile, user profile and menu that

Re: [asterisk-users] How to have callers not being billed when in waiting queue ? [SOLVED]

Basically, in some countries, regulation says: "caller MUST know in advance what call would given the number (s)he dialed". If regulation also states that waiting time shall not charged or shall not charged more than a local/national/whatever call, then an alternative is to separate

Re: [asterisk-users] Questions regarding asterisk-opus package in Debian Stretch repo and Opus in general

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:18:18PM +0200, Olivier wrote: > Hello, > > After reading [1] (in french), I would be very happy if I could get answers > to: > > 1. Does this 13.7+20161113-3 package version has any relation with > asterisk's version it complements ? Current asterisk version in repo is

Re: [asterisk-users] Questions regarding asterisk-opus package in Debian Stretch repo and Opus in general

2017-03-29 17:28 GMT+02:00 Tzafrir Cohen : > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:18:18PM +0200, Olivier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > After reading [1] (in french), I would be very happy if I could get > answers > > to: > > > > 1. Does this 13.7+20161113-3 package version has any

[asterisk-users] Questions regarding asterisk-opus package in Debian Stretch repo and Opus in general

Hello, After reading [1] (in french), I would be very happy if I could get answers to: 1. Does this 13.7+20161113-3 package version has any relation with asterisk's version it complements ? Current asterisk version in repo is 13.14.0. Does this 13.7 complies with it ? 2. From package

Re: [asterisk-users] Questions regarding asterisk-opus package in Debian Stretch repo and Opus in general

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 06:04:49PM +0200, Olivier wrote: > Is there any relation between this external patch and the binary mentioned > in [2] > [2] http://blogs.digium.com/2016/09/30/opus-in-asterisk/ > > The later one mentions a binary-only distribution to comply with legal > constraints. No,

Re: [asterisk-users] ConfBridge function slight change from 11 to 13

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Michaël Gaudette wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have been using ConfBridge since Asterisk 11, and I recently upgraded a > server to 13. While everything that needed fixing seems fixed, I have an > issue that does not seem documented anywhere. > > >

[asterisk-users] Bounty on Google Voice

The channel motif and res_xmpp do not work. But there is one company that does make it work and charges $US 6 for a lifetime connection to your own free Google Voice number, from SIP. I wonder if anybody would be able to fix Asterisks libraries so people of low income would not have to pay a third

Re: [asterisk-users] Bounty on Google Voice

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Saint Michael wrote: > The channel motif and res_xmpp do not work. But there is one company that > does make it work and charges $US 6 for a lifetime connection to your own > free Google Voice number, from SIP. I wonder if anybody would be able

Re: [asterisk-users] Questions regarding asterisk-opus package in Debian Stretch repo and Opus in general

On 29/03/17 16:18, Olivier wrote: Hello, After reading [1] (in french), I would be very happy if I could get answers to: 1. Does this 13.7+20161113-3 package version has any relation with asterisk's version it complements ? Current asterisk version in repo is 13.14.0. Does this 13.7

Re: [asterisk-users] How to have callers not being billed when in waiting queue ? [SOLVED]

Thank you very much, Max, for this valuable and informative answer. Offline billing must be quite complex to set up as several telco may be involved (or origination,transit or termination). Moving to normal landline fare seems much simpler ! Thanks again 2017-03-28 21:41 GMT+02:00 Max Grobecker