Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

Another might be to make sure iptables isn't blocking the connection. You can run iptables -L -n -v To see if its set to block any ports. On June 5, 2017 9:06:55 AM EDT, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >I'm getting: >netstat -a |grep 4569 >udp0 0 0.0.0.0:45690.0.0.0:* >

[asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

Does asterisk listen on port 4569 by default? I'm running version Asterisk 11.25.1 and have a problem registering Zoiper (IAX) to Asterisk. I'm getting an error: Registration refused -- Thelma -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

Is it enabled in the iax.conf file? Regards, Marcelo H. Terres IM: mhter...@jabber.mundoopensource.com.br https://www.mundoopensource.com.br https://twitter.com/mhterres https://linkedin.com/in/marceloterres On 5 June 2017 at 13:48, wrote: > Does

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

No. The 0.0.0.0 listen address is fine. El 5 jun. 2017 10:06, escribió: > I'm getting: > netstat -a |grep 4569 > udp0 0 0.0.0.0:45690.0.0.0:* > > Should I be getting localhost IP? > > Thelma > > On 06/05/2017 06:48 AM, the...@sys-concept.com

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

Dear Thelma, Yes. Asterisk listen on port 4569 UDP on default config. Please, look at the Asterisk logfile, for clues about your issue. Or enable IAX2 debug vía Asterisk CLI. Other ideas: * Check that your server firewall permit UDP port 4569 incoming traffic. * Run tcpdump over the network

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

I'm getting: netstat -a |grep 4569 udp0 0 0.0.0.0:45690.0.0.0:* Should I be getting localhost IP? Thelma On 06/05/2017 06:48 AM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > Does asterisk listen on port 4569 by default? > > I'm running version Asterisk 11.25.1 and have a problem

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

Another idea: * Run netstat -tulpn command on Linux box AND look if there are an Asterisk process listening on 4569 UDP port on 0.0.0.0 El 5 jun. 2017 10:00, "Victor Villarreal" escribió: > Dear Thelma, > > Yes. Asterisk listen on port 4569 UDP on default config. > >

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: > On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: > > Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are the two ends > > points on public networks and visible to one another? If not the reinvite > > may be passing an

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote: > On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: > >> On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: > >>> Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are the two

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'

On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: >> On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: >>> Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are the two ends >>> points on public networks and visible to one another?

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'

On 06/05/2017 at 05:00 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote: >> On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: > Just a guess

[asterisk-users] Extensions of sip trunk

Hi, I just started with setting up a new asterisk system, that will operate on a sip trunk, but I wonder, how to transfer the calls to different extensions, because all calls appear as being send to the base number of the trunk. E.g. given the trunk range of 1234567800-12345678099, a call to

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote: > > On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: > > >> On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: > > >>> Just

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'

On 06/05/2017 at 06:10 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote: >>> On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: > On 06/04/2017 at 01:41

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 01:22 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > > Do you have any idea where to start to look at? Adding additional output > in the source code? Which functions could be interesting? I may add own > debug code to see why things are happening as they happen here. The logic for T.38

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: DMARC enabled domains on this list

On Fri, June 2, 2017 16:30, Doug Lytle wrote: This is likely the issue surrounding mailing lists rewriting headers and/or modifying messages bodies or simply re-transmitting messages as the original sender from an unapproved domain. This was discussed at length on the ITEF mailing list.

[asterisk-users] Conference bridge profile does not exist

Hello, I have ab profile in /etc/asterisk/confbridge.conf but in my dialplan this profile is not found I tried a lot, but did no solution. What can be wrong? [out_bridge] type=bridge exten => ,n,ConfBridge(${conf_room},out_bridge) [Jun 5 19:27:09] WARNING[11008][C-0468]:

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

No, I don't think it is IP table issue, I've not upgraded dd-wrt for a while and it was zoiper was working OK with my previous version of asterisk. After upgrade to 11.25.1 it stop working. I'm sure port forwarding on dd-wrt is working OK as I have port 80 and 443 open. Thelma On 06/05/2017

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

I think you need to increase verbose output and search in /var/log/asterisk/full for any error message related to IAX2 registration or simil. 2017-06-05 17:12 GMT-03:00 : > No, I don't think it is IP table issue, I've not upgraded dd-wrt for a > while and it was zoiper

Re: [asterisk-users] *****SPAM***** Re: IAX port 4569

Ok.. Maybe you can try with this command, from the Asterisk cli: cli> core set verbose 5 cli> core set debug 5 cli> iax2 set debug on And then, try to register with your softphone. At the end of the test, execute: cli> iax2 set debug off And finally, review the logfiles. 2017-06-05 17:40

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: DMARC enabled domains on this list

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 01:08:17PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > This is likely the issue surrounding mailing lists rewriting headers > and/or modifying messages bodies or simply re-transmitting messages as > the original sender from an unapproved domain. This was discussed at > length on the

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

Use the command bellow to check if is Asterisk opening the port. netstat -nap | grep 4569 You need to see something like this output, otherwise your asterisk is not opening the port. udp0 0 0.0.0.0:4569 0.0.0.0:* 10244/asterisk Att, Hélvio Junior

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 04:26 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > On 06/05/2017 at 06:29 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 01:22 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > >> > >> Do you have any idea where to start to look at? Adding additional output > >> in the source code? Which functions could be

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

There are two different networks connecting in the tcpdump, 10 and 192. In this example that you send, are you trying to connect from different ips in different server ips? Regards, On 5 Jun 2017 9:23 pm, wrote: Yes, it is working! tcpdump -ni any port 4569 dropped

Re: [asterisk-users] *****SPAM***** Re: IAX port 4569

Doesn't matter how much I increase the verbose output asterisk -vvr asterisk will not even print a single line. How to find out if my firewall has this port open? https://www.grc.com is reporting that my port is 4569 is in Stealth mode (so it is closed) :-/ Thelma On 06/05/2017 02:19

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'

On 06/05/2017 at 06:29 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 01:22 PM, Michael Maier wrote: >> >> Do you have any idea where to start to look at? Adding additional output >> in the source code? Which functions could be interesting? I may add own >> debug code to see why things are

Re: [asterisk-users] Extensions of sip trunk

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:10:50PM +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > ; matches 12345678099, too > exten => _1234567800,1,Dial(SIP/int) > > Except from SIP invite with tcpdump: > > INVITE sip:12345678@provider:5060 SIP/2.0 > From: ;tag=as6bc7cbbc > To:

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

Yes, it is working! tcpdump -ni any port 4569 dropped privs to tcpdump tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on any, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size 262144 bytes 14:20:42.184521 IP 10.0.0.108.4569 > 10.0.0.100.4569: UDP, length 53

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

You can use tcpdump in your server to verify if it is receiving the packets. tcpdump -ni any port 4569 So you have more than one ip in the server? On 5 Jun 2017 9:13 pm, wrote: > No, I don't think it is IP table issue, I've not upgraded dd-wrt for a > while and it was

Re: [asterisk-users] *****SPAM***** Re: IAX port 4569

Try tcpdump On 5 Jun 2017 9:41 pm, wrote: Doesn't matter how much I increase the verbose output asterisk -vvr asterisk will not even print a single line. How to find out if my firewall has this port open? https://www.grc.com is reporting that my port is 4569 is

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

yes it does. netstat -nap | grep 4569 udp0 0 0.0.0.0:45690.0.0.0:* 17375/asterisk Thelma On 06/05/2017 03:10 PM, Helvio Junior wrote: > Use the command bellow to check if is Asterisk opening the port. > > netstat -nap | grep 4569 > > You

Re: [asterisk-users] Extensions of sip trunk

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: I wonder, if I really need to grab the extension with Set(DN=${SIP_HEADER(TO):5}) or something similar? Yes, something like if they can't fix the R-URI: exten => X_.,n,Set(TO=${CUT(SIP_HEADER(To),@,1)}) exten => X_.,n,Set(TO=${CUT(TO,:,2)}) exten

Re: [asterisk-users] Extensions of sip trunk

Hi Daniel, On Montag, 5. Juni 2017 21:45:01 Daniel Tryba wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 06:10:50PM +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > > ; matches 12345678099, too > > exten => _1234567800,1,Dial(SIP/int) > > > > Except from SIP invite with tcpdump: > > > > INVITE sip:12345678@provider:5060

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

From the tcpdump I'd say your asterisk server is talking to Zoiper. I think Victor suggested turning on "iax2 set debug on". You should see the raw the messages there. You might even see why Asterisk is refusing the registration. Chris On 05/06/17 07:35 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > yes it