[asterisk-users] PCI32 and PCI-X compatibility

2008-02-13 Thread Marco
Hi,
this is my 1st message, I'm writing to ask if anyone knows if a PCI32 
card like the TDM400P (quad analog) or the B410P (quad BRI) is working 
on a PCI-X bus, at 100MHz or 133 MHz. I'm really stuck with this, since 
I found a partial yes on this mailing list but my supplier says no!
Thanks,

Marco


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Friday Feb 15th @ 12 Noon EST: VoIP Users Conference welcomes Lumenvox

2008-02-13 Thread randulo
This Friday, February 15th, at 12 Noon EST, 9AM PST, 17:00 UTC,
Lumenvox will be joining us on the VoIP Users Conference.
This week, the last in a series about IVR, Lumenvox will be there to
discuss and field your questions on their speech recognition
solutions.

http://www.VoipUsersConference.org  -  for info on the conference, how
to connect, etc

IRC freenode.net #voip-users-conference  -  to ask questions and chat
if you do not wish to talk

http://food4wine.ning.com  -  VoIP Users Conference Community site
(blogs, forum, notes, archives)

In a nutshell, you can just call in via PSTN beginning at Noon EST:

Phone Number: (724) 444-7444
Upon answer, enter  22622# 1#

or see the voipusersconference.org for SIP and Talkshoe details. You
can also see all the records here:

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=22622

Talkshoe has a chat/SIP client combo you can download for WIndoze/Mac
if that's of interest to you. It makes following the discussion
easier. Here is what that looks like:
http://tinyurl.com/3c6ztn

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] restart asterisk daily

2008-02-13 Thread randulo
On Feb 13, 2008 8:48 AM, Rilawich Ango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Actually, I donno it is a memory leak or not.  I have a server only
 running asterisk.  As time goes by, the free memory shown in the top
 is decreased.  After I restart the asterisk, the free memory comes

I observed the same behavior. Someone told me that that's a normal
feature of linux, it manages memory that way. If that's true, than it
isn't normal to see the same (large) amount of free memory over time
on a box running asterisk only. However, I rarely restart and it
hasn't caused problems. Here's mine right now:

09:14:39  up 73 days, 18:47,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
67 processes: 65 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states:   0.1% user   3.9% system   0.0% nice   0.0% iowait  95.8% idle
Mem:   515460k av,  509416k used,6044k free,   0k shrd,   80052k buff
   152896k active, 191472k inactive
Swap:  477248k av,   0k used,  477248k free  242404k cached

'course, these days, half a meg isn't much :)

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] restart asterisk daily

2008-02-13 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:48:14PM +0800, Rilawich Ango wrote:
 Actually, I donno it is a memory leak or not.  I have a server only
 running asterisk.  As time goes by, the free memory shown in the top
 is decreased.  After I restart the asterisk, the free memory comes
 again.  That's why I wonder if regular restart asterisk is necessary.
 Use a crontab to restart asterisk is a way to do it but you have to
 maintain a crontab.  Is it possible to use logrotate instead?  Or
 other better way?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free -m
 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:   485477  7  0  0100
-/+ buffers/cache:376108
Swap: 1419270   1149
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ top -b | head -n 5
top - 10:18:32 up 19 days, 14:38, 24 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.33, 0.21
Tasks: 166 total,   1 running, 163 sleeping,   2 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  1.1%us,  0.1%sy,  0.0%ni, 98.2%id,  0.5%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
Mem:496648k total,   489044k used, 7604k free,   32k buffers
Swap:  1453840k total,   276740k used,  1177100k free,   103380k cached
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps aux | grep asterisk
asterisk  9559  0.0  2.5 474896 12892 ?Ssl  Feb12   0:00 
/usr/sbin/asterisk -p -U asterisk

Gee, I only have 7 MB free! I must reboot to free some memory! And that
Asterisk is using so much memory!

In fact:
1. The system has some 100MB of free memory. almost all of it is used
for caching and such.

2. Asterisk overcommits memory: it generally asks the kernel huge
ammounts of memory, but doesn't really try to use them. At least with
Linux such overcommits are not claimed at all.

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] differences

2008-02-13 Thread Khaled Chehab
Hi All



What are the differences between asterisk 1.2.4 and 1.4.6 beta


In functionality ,services  and bugs.




 
Regards




*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf 
of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation 
by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this 
electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its 
subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the 
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure 
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its 
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the 
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or 
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of 
its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects.
*



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How to soft hangup all channels at a time .

2008-02-13 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:49:38PM +1100, Mohammad Salaque wrote:
 Dear all,
 
 Anyone can point me how to soft hangup all channels using single
 command ? I am using Asterisk 1.4.15.

restart now

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] differences

2008-02-13 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:25:44PM +0200, Khaled Chehab wrote:
 What are the differences between asterisk 1.2.4 and 1.4.6 beta 

You probably ask about Asterisk 1.4 vs. Asterisk 1.6 beta, right?

 
 In functionality ,services  

You can probably read about some of the changes in the file UPGRADE.txt
.

http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk/UPGRADE.txt

 and bugs.

Bugs? You mean undocumented features? ;-)
Some of them are known to be documented in http://bugs.digium.com/

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime SIP peers - reloading cached info

2008-02-13 Thread Rob Hillis
That's why I didn't see anything about the REALTIME function when I went 
looking - many of our production systems are still on later versions of 1.2.


Given that it wasn't made obsolete at the /beginning/ of the 1.4 cycle, 
I'm hoping Digium reconsider making it obsolete in 1.6 and schedule it 
for removal in 1.8.  Half a development cycle isn't a very long time for 
a warning that a function will be removed.


Atis Lezdins wrote:

On 2/13/08, Rob Hillis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 If it is being removed in 1.6, I'm a little concerned since there's no
mention of this when you show the application, nor on voip-info.org.  What
application/function is it being replaced by?



There's an obsolete warning in 1.4.18, but i somehow remember that
it's obsolete already since some 1.4.11

It's func_realtime as i said before. usage shouldn't be much
different, you can replace with:

Set(REALTIME(sip_buddies,name,100,my_field)=foo);

Also, seems that func_realtime will soon support SQL INSERT's and DELETE's :)

Regards,
Atis


  

 Atis Lezdins wrote:
 | On 2/13/08, Rob Hillis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 | Hash: SHA1
 |
 | Atis Lezdins wrote:
 | | By RealTimeUpdate do you mean func_realtime? It shouldn't care, as
 | | cache is not implemented in realtime level, but higher (chan_sip).
 | |
 | | Are you sure you need sip show XXX load. If you sip prune peer
 | | data, it should be re-loaded on next access.
 | |
 | | What i was suggesting - to dig into chan_sip and create dialplan
 | | application SipPrune(peer) that would prune the peer directly, by
 | | using corresponding function - sip_prune_peer() in chan_sip.c - that
 | | way you will gain some extra performance, as there's no manager/cli
 | | overhead.
 | |
 | | However if you're uncomfortable with C, the app_system shouldn't cause
 | | any troubles :)
 |
 | RealTimeUpdate is more likely to correspond to app_realtime rather than
 | func_realtime.
 |
 | As to my knowledge - that is obsolete and being removed in 1.6,
 | func_realtime replaces it. That's why i wondered about name -  I just
 | never happened to use it :)
 |
 | Regards,
 | Atis
 |
 |

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Remi - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHsnaM6uKn5cBSgGQRAo/TAKDCruPrn2nm2XV/PYbfSuBKA0j5OwCfQ/Ox
 QE3SYEmZ01QHUT4ITwmLnT0=
 =SKEW
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





  


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] urgent-channels

2008-02-13 Thread Khaled Chehab
Hi All 

 

I am using asterisk 1.2.4

 

Please see the results when I execute Sip show channels

X

X

X

X

x

192.168.8.106(None)  04cddc1f5a0  00101/0  unkn  No


215.96.142.83(None)  caac0846-cf  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  94910146-46  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  793ed1eb0f2  00101/0  unkn  No


85.219.172.253   (None)  67a0d6b3191  00101/0  unkn  No


85.219.172.253   (None)  0d778c314f5  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  94910146-46  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  30a7d77c5bc  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  efa10246-ea  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  efa10246-ea  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  efa10246-ea  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  94910146-46  00101/0  unkn  No


569 active SIP channels

 

Why these channels exit or didn't be killed,how can I solve that.

 

 

 

Regards

 




*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf 
of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation 
by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this 
electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its 
subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the 
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure 
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its 
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the 
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or 
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of 
its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects.
*
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] HP proliant and hpasm

2008-02-13 Thread stoffell
On Feb 10, 2008 2:01 AM, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is anyone successfully running asterisk on an HP proliant while using
 their management software, hpasm?

 I have two DL360's and two TE220B's.  The cards have their own IRQ's.
 No matter what combination of settings I use, the cards fail the
 patlooptest if hpasm (ver 7.9.1) is running.  If I stop it the cards
 pass the test.

Hi there, we do run the hpasm on the HP Proliant servers without any problem.

We had some issues a while ago with ML350's that kept giving problems,
IRQ misses, red alarms, dropped calls, etc.. Everything 'looked' fine
(no irq sharing etc..) but the problem was related to iLO. Disabling
iLO made it all work.. So if you have issues, try that for starters..

What distro and versions are you using?

cheers,
stoffell

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Hardware needed

2008-02-13 Thread voip crazy
Dear List,

I have to plan an instalation of an asterisk box for over 400 extensions
(Sip and Iax2) and 4 PRI channels.
I do not know which hardware (server) should I buy to support this amount of
extensions.

Someone made a similar instalation? which hardware (server) did you use?
Which was the processor type and the amount of memory used by the server?

Any clue will be welcomed.

Thanks in advance.

VoipCrazy
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Hardware needed

2008-02-13 Thread stoffell
On Feb 13, 2008 10:15 AM, voip crazy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Someone made a similar instalation? which hardware (server) did you use?
 Which was the processor type and the amount of memory used by the server?

You will probably get some useful info on the list but also check out
voip-info.org:

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+dimensioning

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+hardware+recommendations


cheers,

stoffell

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] [asterisk-dev] chan_ooh323 patches compatible with codec negotiation patch applied to asterisk 1.4.17

2008-02-13 Thread Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
Hi all,

It is posted here:

http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11976

Still waiting for the approval.

Please see the notes.

thanks,

Ganbold


On 2/12/08, Johan Wilfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  Sorry for cross posting.
  I attached my chan_ooh323 patches (asterisk-addons-1.4.5) when codec
  negotiation patch changes applied to asterisk-1.4.17.
  Please let me know whether my patches are correct or not.
 
  thanks in advance,
 
  Ganbold
 
 
  
 
  
 For licensing issues nobody will be able to use your patch if you don't
 submit it thought the bug tracker at http://bugs.digium.com/
 You will be able to agree to the digium license after you have created
 an account.
 There is also a bug tracker introduction that is useful to read at
 http://asterisk.org/developers/bug-guidelines

 Nice work!
 /Johan

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-dev mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] urgent-channels

2008-02-13 Thread Khaled Chehab
 

I am using asterisk 1.2.4

 

Please see the results when I execute Sip show channels

X

X

X

X

x

192.168.8.106(None)  04cddc1f5a0  00101/0  unkn  No


215.96.142.83(None)  caac0846-cf  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  94910146-46  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  793ed1eb0f2  00101/0  unkn  No


85.219.172.253   (None)  67a0d6b3191  00101/0  unkn  No


85.219.172.253   (None)  0d778c314f5  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  94910146-46  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  30a7d77c5bc  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  efa10246-ea  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  efa10246-ea  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  efa10246-ea  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  94910146-46  00101/0  unkn  No


569 active SIP channels

 

asterisk1*CLI show channels

Channel  Location State   Application(Data)


0 active channels

0 active calls

 

 

Why these channels exit or didn't be killed,how can I solve that.

 

 

 

 

Regards

 

 

  _  

*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written
confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual
in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or
its subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any
of its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other
defects.
*




*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf 
of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation 
by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this 
electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its 
subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the 
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure 
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its 
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the 
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or 
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of 
its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects.
*
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with DTMF dialing

2008-02-13 Thread Andres Jimenez
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Andrew Joakimsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Maybe it is related but with PRI Asterisk does not generate any tone
  it sends a signal regarding your keypress. If you are using SIP phones
  make sure the dtmfmode in use is RFC2833.

I have just double check and my phones use DTMF in RFC2833 mode.

I wil try to downgrade my zaptel later today



-- 
Andres Jimenez

GPG : http://www.andresin.com/gpg/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Automatically start after restart

2008-02-13 Thread bilal ghayyad
Dear Matt;

Special thanks for you, but I did not understand what
u mean by: Hash: SHA1?

Do u mean to type SHA1 from the putty when I am
connected remotely? I tried that and I did not find
such command, but rather I found commands like
sha1sum, sha224sum, sha256sum, ... 

Can u advise what exactly meant by SHA1 and from where
to be typed?

I am using Fedora core 7.

Regards
Bilal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

bilal ghayyad wrote:
 Hi All;
 
 How can I let Asterisk start automatically once the
 machine restarted without need to type asterisk
-cvvv?
 
 Any script or something that can do that?
 
 Also, in which command line screen (F1 or F2 or F3
or
 ..?) I will find it?

Use the asterisk init scripts or safe_asterisk:

1. type make config after you finish compiling and
installing
 Asterisk
2. type service asterisk start (in Fedora/CentOS
etc) or
/etc/init.d/asterisk start in other distros
3. type asterisk -r to connect to the process

or do the same but using safe_asterisk instead of
the scripts.

The benefit of the make config stuff is that you can
then do chkconfig
asterisk on to make Asterisk start up automatically
on boot.

- --
Kind Regards,

Matt Riddell
Director



  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Automatically start after restart

2008-02-13 Thread Atis Lezdins
On 2/13/08, bilal ghayyad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Matt;

 Special thanks for you, but I did not understand what
 u mean by: Hash: SHA1?

 Do u mean to type SHA1 from the putty when I am
 connected remotely? I tried that and I did not find
 such command, but rather I found commands like
 sha1sum, sha224sum, sha256sum, ...

 Can u advise what exactly meant by SHA1 and from where
 to be typed?

ROFL

Sorry, can't stop laughing...

Bilal, you should first learn netiquette, and read email completely.
You would find then, that answer is enclosed inline (as it's commonly
done in emails). SHA1 indicates hashing algorithm for signed email.

Regards,
Atis


 I am using Fedora core 7.

 Regards
 Bilal
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 bilal ghayyad wrote:
  Hi All;
 
  How can I let Asterisk start automatically once the
  machine restarted without need to type asterisk
 -cvvv?
 
  Any script or something that can do that?
 
  Also, in which command line screen (F1 or F2 or F3
 or
  ..?) I will find it?

 Use the asterisk init scripts or safe_asterisk:

 1. type make config after you finish compiling and
 installing
  Asterisk
 2. type service asterisk start (in Fedora/CentOS
 etc) or
 /etc/init.d/asterisk start in other distros
 3. type asterisk -r to connect to the process

 or do the same but using safe_asterisk instead of
 the scripts.

 The benefit of the make config stuff is that you can
 then do chkconfig
 asterisk on to make Asterisk start up automatically
 on boot.

 - --
 Kind Regards,

 Matt Riddell
 Director



   
 
 Looking for last minute shopping deals?
 Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
 http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-- 
Atis Lezdins
VoIP Developer,
IQ Labs Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: atis.lezdins
Cell Phone: +371 28806004
Work phone: +1 800 7502835

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime SIP peers - reloading cached info

2008-02-13 Thread Johansson Olle E

13 feb 2008 kl. 10.27 skrev Rob Hillis:

 That's why I didn't see anything about the REALTIME function when I  
 went looking - many of our production systems are still on later  
 versions of 1.2.

 Given that it wasn't made obsolete at the beginning of the 1.4  
 cycle, I'm hoping Digium reconsider making it obsolete in 1.6 and  
 schedule it for removal in 1.8.  Half a development cycle isn't a  
 very long time for a warning that a function will be removed.

First, it's not Digium - it's the Asterisk developer team. There  
still is a difference, not all of us are employed by Digium. My work  
is mostly funded by myself nowadays, and some by customers that hires  
me as a consultant for various Asterisk projects. I tried to get more  
general funding to spend more time with Asterisk development, but  
failed.

So please rememner that there are a few independent regular Asterisk  
developers out there that is not on the Digium payroll and still take  
part in  decisions about Asterisk.

The way it works is that we decide which functions to deprecate during  
the development cycle. So any decisions was made before the 1.4  
release and stays for the duration of the 1.4 release. We did not  
deprecate anything in 1.4 after the initial release late 2006.

The functionality that was marked as deprecated in 1.4 will be  
removed in 1.6. In fact, it's propably already removed in the  
development code that is the base for the future 1.6.

Over a year is a long time for a warning like this, considering that  
1.6 won't be out for a while (we're in beta test cycle) it might even  
be 1.5 year warning. That should be more than enough for most people -  
I hope. Considering that people don't upgrade quickly, it will  
propably be more than that for most users (as you are still on 1.2 :-) )

Just wanted to clarify the process, I have no detailed insight into  
the realtime functions.

/O


---
* Olle E. Johansson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Asterisk Training http://edvina.net/training/




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How to detect if SIP extension BUSY?

2008-02-13 Thread Gergo Csibra
Saturday, February 9, 2008, 10:29:08 AM, Csibra wrote:

 My problem is in subject. As I read in documentations and
 voip-info.org I can't user ChanIsAvalil because it not detects BUSY
 information on SIP channel. I've tried to use SIPPEER function, but it
 gives OK (9 ms) back on BUSY SIP channel. I use Asterisk 1.2.15, SIP
 extensions are Linksys PAP2. Have any other idea?

Well?
Is it impossible to detect BUSY on SIP channels?

-- 
Best regards,
 Gergomailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Attendant phone

2008-02-13 Thread voip crazy
Dear list,

I need to buy a phone which could monitor the state of the maximun number of
sip extensions about 200. It is for an attendant. I just saw Snom 370 with
keypad and Linksys 962 but they do not let me to monitor 200 extensions
states adding keypads.

Do you know any kind of phone that let me do that?
Which is the maximun number of extensions your phones can monitor and which
models phones are?

Thanks,

VoipCrazy
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Attendant phone

2008-02-13 Thread Atis Lezdins
On 2/13/08, voip crazy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear list,

 I need to buy a phone which could monitor the state of the maximun number of
 sip extensions about 200. It is for an attendant. I just saw Snom 370 with
 keypad and Linksys 962 but they do not let me to monitor 200 extensions
 states adding keypads.

 Do you know any kind of phone that let me do that?
 Which is the maximun number of extensions your phones can monitor and which
 models phones are?

You want 200 LEDs on single phone?

Wouldn't it be wiser to have some web app that shows you those states
by groups, etc..

Regards,
Atis

-- 
Atis Lezdins
VoIP Developer,
IQ Labs Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: atis.lezdins
Cell Phone: +371 28806004
Work phone: +1 800 7502835

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Attendant phone

2008-02-13 Thread Louwrens Benadé
The norm (if memory serves) is about 64 – 70 extensions per attendant. After
that, people usually split off onto multiple attendants just so the
receptionists don’t kill themselves in queues.

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of voip crazy
Sent: 13 February 2008 02:31 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Attendant phone

 

Dear list,

I need to buy a phone which could monitor the state of the maximun number of
sip extensions about 200. It is for an attendant. I just saw Snom 370 with
keypad and Linksys 962 but they do not let me to monitor 200 extensions
states adding keypads.

Do you know any kind of phone that let me do that?
Which is the maximun number of extensions your phones can monitor and which
models phones are?

Thanks,

VoipCrazy 

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] how to create a standalone voicemail server

2008-02-13 Thread Vincent
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:24:14 +, Cheikhou DIAW
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've been googling all night looking for a tutorial that shows how to make
an asterisk standalone voicemail server , no way !

Asterisk: The Future of Telephony, Second Edition
http://downloads.oreilly.com/books/9780596510480.pdf


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] urgent-channels

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Langstaff
A quick look at http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/releases/ tells me
that 1.2.4 *might not* be the latest release of software.




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Khaled
Chehab
Sent: 13 February 2008 09:55
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [asterisk-users] urgent-channels



 

I am using asterisk 1.2.4

 

Please see the results when I execute Sip show channels

X

X

X

X

x

192.168.8.106(None)  04cddc1f5a0  00101/0  unkn  No


215.96.142.83(None)  caac0846-cf  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  94910146-46  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  793ed1eb0f2  00101/0  unkn  No


85.219.172.253   (None)  67a0d6b3191  00101/0  unkn  No


85.219.172.253   (None)  0d778c314f5  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  94910146-46  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  30a7d77c5bc  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  efa10246-ea  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  efa10246-ea  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  efa10246-ea  00101/0  unkn  No


192.168.8.106(None)  94910146-46  00101/0  unkn  No


569 active SIP channels

 

asterisk1*CLI show channels

Channel  Location State
Application(Data) 

0 active channels

0 active calls

 

 

Why these channels exit or didn't be killed,how can I solve
that.

 

 

 

 

Regards

 

 





*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without
express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views
expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily
reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed
to the addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from
disclosure belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message
and its attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and
notify the sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or
attachment or disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic
message and any of its attachments, or that they are free from computer
viruses or other defects.
*





*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without
express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views
expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily
reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed
to the addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from
disclosure belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message
and its attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and
notify the sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or
attachment or disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic
message and any of its attachments, or that they are free from computer
viruses or other defects.
*



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] [Linux/Python 2.4.2] Forking Python doesn't work

2008-02-13 Thread Vincent
Hello

When a call comes in, I'd like to fork a Python script that
broadcasts a message so that users see the CID name + number pop up on
their computer screen, and simultaneously ring their phones.

The following script doesn't work as planned: It waits until the
script ends before moving on to the next step, which is Dial():

===
exten = s,1,AGI(netcid.py|${CALLERID(num)}|${CALLERID(name)}) exten
= s,n,Dial(${MYPHONE},5)   
===
# cat netcid.py
#!/usr/bin/python

import socket,sys,time,os

def sendstuff(data):
   s.sendto(data,(ipaddr,portnum))
   return

sys.stdout = open(os.devnull, 'w')
if os.fork():
#BAD? sys.exit(0)   
os._exit(0)
else:
now = time.localtime(time.time())
dateandtime = time.strftime(NaVm/%y NaVM, now)

myarray = []
myarray.append(STAT Rings: 1)
myarray.append(RING)
myarray.append(NAME  + cidname)
myarray.append(TTSN Call from  + cidname)
myarray.append(NMBR  + cidnum)
myarray.append(TYPE K)

s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET,socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET,socket.SO_BROADCAST,True)

portnum = 42685
ipaddr = 192.168.0.255

for i in myarray:
sendstuff(i)

#Must pause, and send IDLE for dialog box to close
time.sleep(5)
sendstuff(IDLE  + dateandtime)
===

In another forum, people told me that I should fork twice. Is that
really necessary?
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/278731

Thank you.


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How to detect if SIP extension BUSY?

2008-02-13 Thread Johansson Olle E

13 feb 2008 kl. 13.14 skrev Gergo Csibra:

 Saturday, February 9, 2008, 10:29:08 AM, Csibra wrote:

 My problem is in subject. As I read in documentations and
 voip-info.org I can't user ChanIsAvalil because it not detects BUSY
 information on SIP channel. I've tried to use SIPPEER function, but  
 it
 gives OK (9 ms) back on BUSY SIP channel. I use Asterisk 1.2.15,  
 SIP
 extensions are Linksys PAP2. Have any other idea?

 Well?
 Is it impossible to detect BUSY on SIP channels?
Place a call to it and if the phone reports BUSY, asterisk will return  
BUSY.

Another way is to use the GROUPCOUNT set of functions, to keep a state  
in Asterisk or to use the embedded call counter in the SIP channel  
driver, that is reported in the SIPPEER function.

As often is the case, there are many ways to solve an issue in Asterisk.

/Olle


---
* Olle E. Johansson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Asterisk Training http://edvina.net/training/




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Telephone line signaling configuration in Egypt for FXO ports

2008-02-13 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi All;

I am facing a problem that the telephon line in Egypt
does not work with the FXO port at the digium card
(TDM22B), and I tried to play in loadzone and
defaultzone without any success, when we call to the
PBX it gives Busy signal sometimes, and othertimes it
rings without any response in Asterisk.

Is there any other configuration I have to do it to
resolve this issue? Any advise about a troubleshooting
method to resolve it?

Any help?
Regards
Bilal


  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Telephone line signaling configuration in Egypt for FXO ports

2008-02-13 Thread aymen warfalli

Hi Bilal
could you post the TDM configuration file (zaptel.conf  and zapata.conf) and 
how did you compile it
Regards Ayman Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:35:43 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Telephone line 
signaling configuration in Egypt for FXO ports  Hi All;  I am facing a 
problem that the telephon line in Egypt does not work with the FXO port at the 
digium card (TDM22B), and I tried to play in loadzone and defaultzone without 
any success, when we call to the PBX it gives Busy signal sometimes, and 
othertimes it rings without any response in Asterisk.  Is there any other 
configuration I have to do it to resolve this issue? Any advise about a 
troubleshooting method to resolve it?  Any help? Regards Bilal   

 Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.  http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs  
___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation 
Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --  asterisk-users mailing list To 
UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_
Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we give.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Telephone line signaling configuration in Egypt for FXO ports

2008-02-13 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:35:43AM -0800, bilal ghayyad wrote:
 Hi All;
 
 I am facing a problem that the telephon line in Egypt
 does not work with the FXO port at the digium card
 (TDM22B), and I tried to play in loadzone and
 defaultzone without any success, when we call to the
 PBX it gives Busy signal sometimes, and othertimes it
 rings without any response in Asterisk.
 
 Is there any other configuration I have to do it to
 resolve this issue? Any advise about a troubleshooting
 method to resolve it?

What version of zaptel? What do you have in zaptel.conf?

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How to detect if SIP extension BUSY?

2008-02-13 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 13:14, Wed 13 Feb 08, Gergo Csibra wrote:
 Saturday, February 9, 2008, 10:29:08 AM, Csibra wrote:
 
  My problem is in subject. As I read in documentations and
  voip-info.org I can't user ChanIsAvalil because it not detects BUSY
  information on SIP channel. I've tried to use SIPPEER function, but it
  gives OK (9 ms) back on BUSY SIP channel. I use Asterisk 1.2.15, SIP
  extensions are Linksys PAP2. Have any other idea?
 
 Well?
 Is it impossible to detect BUSY on SIP channels?

not in stock 1.2
Bristuff has a function for it, and russell created a
function for it in current trunk that is also available as
patch to 1.4

So you have 2 possibilities:
- install bristuff 1.2 or 1.4
- install 1.4 with russell's patch applied

bristuff examples:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+cmd+BristuffDevstate

asterisk + function from russell:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+func+Devstate

-- 

Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD

Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users?


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] [Linux/Python 2.4.2] Forking Python doesn't work

2008-02-13 Thread Diego Aguirre
Vincent,

try to use System() instead of AGI()

Diego Aguirre
Infodag - Informática
FWD#: 459696
Nikotel#: 99 21 8138-2710
EnumLookup#: +55 21 8138-2710
DUNDi-br#: 21 8138-2710

Vincent escreveu:
 Hello
 
   When a call comes in, I'd like to fork a Python script that
 broadcasts a message so that users see the CID name + number pop up on
 their computer screen, and simultaneously ring their phones.
 
 The following script doesn't work as planned: It waits until the
 script ends before moving on to the next step, which is Dial():
 
 ===
 exten = s,1,AGI(netcid.py|${CALLERID(num)}|${CALLERID(name)}) exten
 = s,n,Dial(${MYPHONE},5)   
 ===
 # cat netcid.py
 #!/usr/bin/python
 
 import socket,sys,time,os
 
 def sendstuff(data):
s.sendto(data,(ipaddr,portnum))
return
 
 sys.stdout = open(os.devnull, 'w')
 if os.fork():
 #BAD? sys.exit(0)   
 os._exit(0)
 else:
 now = time.localtime(time.time())
 dateandtime = time.strftime(NaVm/%y NaVM, now)
 
 myarray = []
 myarray.append(STAT Rings: 1)
 myarray.append(RING)
 myarray.append(NAME  + cidname)
 myarray.append(TTSN Call from  + cidname)
 myarray.append(NMBR  + cidnum)
 myarray.append(TYPE K)
 
 s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET,socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
 s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET,socket.SO_BROADCAST,True)
 
 portnum = 42685
 ipaddr = 192.168.0.255
 
 for i in myarray:
 sendstuff(i)
 
 #Must pause, and send IDLE for dialog box to close
 time.sleep(5)
 sendstuff(IDLE  + dateandtime)
 ===
 
 In another forum, people told me that I should fork twice. Is that
 really necessary?
 http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/278731
 
 Thank you.
 
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Attendant phone

2008-02-13 Thread Doug Lytle
voip crazy wrote:
 Dear list,

 I need to buy a phone which could monitor the state of the maximun 
 number of sip extensions about 200. It is for an attendant. I just saw 
 Snom 370 with keypad and Linksys 962 but they do not let me to monitor 
 200 extensions states adding keypads.



I'd suggest looking at FOP (Flash Operator Panel).

Doug


-- 
 
Ben Franklin quote:

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] [Linux/Python 2.4.2] Forking Python doesn't work

2008-02-13 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 13:46, Wed 13 Feb 08, Vincent wrote:
 Hello
 
   When a call comes in, I'd like to fork a Python script that
 broadcasts a message so that users see the CID name + number pop up on
 their computer screen, and simultaneously ring their phones.
 
 The following script doesn't work as planned: It waits until the
 script ends before moving on to the next step, which is Dial():
 
 In another forum, people told me that I should fork twice. Is that
 really necessary?
 http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/278731

If you want it to detach the program from it's parent you
need the double fork yes.

-- 

Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD

Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users?


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] restart asterisk daily

2008-02-13 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:31:11PM +0100, randulo wrote:
 On Feb 13, 2008 9:29 AM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Gee, I only have 7 MB free! I must reboot to free some memory! And that
  Asterisk is using so much memory!
 
 Do I detect a tiny bit of sarcasm here? Someone from Digium (or
 elsewhere) might be able to jump in and explain the asterisk memory
 strategy and why it doesn't have any detrimental effects on anything
 else running on the same system.

Sarcastic indeed. Indeed all those assertions were false.

Off-Topic:
The big memory consumer I have on my system is $GECKO_BROWSER. I
currently have iceape (seamonkey), after just one day of operation:

tzafrir   8186  1.1 53.1 763016 264008 ?   Ssl  Feb12  19:23 
/usr/lib/iceape/iceape-bin

Iceweasel (firefox), epiphany and kazehakase don't seem to be much
different.

So I have no issues with the little copy of Asterisk on my desktop
system...

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Wanted: VoIP Engineer for Switerland

2008-02-13 Thread laurent schweizer
Peoplefone AG offers Voice over IP(VoIP) services with exceptional rates.
Peoplefone is a certified partner of
Siemenshttp://www.siemens.ch/index.jsp?sdc_p=c175fi1012637lmno1012637psuz1sdc_sid=1113876080;and
AVM/FRITZ!Box http://www.fritz-shop.ch/ . Due to our rapid growth,  we are
currently seeking for:





VOIP SPECIALIST

Place of work: Zurich

*Requirements:*

   - Graduation from college or university with a Bachelor's degree
   (preferably IT)
   - Experience with PHP
   - Practical knowledge of C and C++
   - Practical knowledge of Mysql and Postgresql
   - Linux experience
   - Knowledge of IP Networks, UDP, TCP
   - Experience with tools for Network analysis like Ethereal
   - VoIP basic knowledge, VoIP servers, configuration of devices
   - Fluency in English
   - Ability to interact with individuals and groups at all levels
   - Detail oriented and analytical
   - Strong verbal and written communication skills



Knowledge of Perl, Java, Asterisk / SER / OPENSER, ability to configure
routers, Cisco or Patton gateways, knowledge of SIP and STUN protocol,
knowledge of NAT problems, of outbandProxy, knowledge of monitoring tools
like Cactus, Nagios, MRTG or high availability tools like DRBD, Hearthbeat
would be an additional asset.


Interested individuals are requested to send their resume to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] restart asterisk daily

2008-02-13 Thread randulo
On Feb 13, 2008 9:29 AM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gee, I only have 7 MB free! I must reboot to free some memory! And that
 Asterisk is using so much memory!

Do I detect a tiny bit of sarcasm here? Someone from Digium (or
elsewhere) might be able to jump in and explain the asterisk memory
strategy and why it doesn't have any detrimental effects on anything
else running on the same system.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] UK issue - Asterisk dialling 999... sort of

2008-02-13 Thread Phil Knighton
Hello
 
This is a fun one for the list...
 
Twice now, the Police have contacted us to say they have had a silent
call then hangup from our landline number to the 999 service.  As a
matter of course, they follow up these calls in case someone is in
distress.  Nobody here was in distress - well, no more than normal!  The
Police aren't hugely happy when we tell them it must be a mistake.
 
Thing is, I have checked both our master log, and our dialled calls log
- and nobody dialled 999!  Each phone has an account code applied from
sip.conf, and we log all numbers dialled.  Nobody dialled out.
 
There are no phones connected in anyway other than via Asterisk, fax
number is dealt with by a virtual machine, alarm system is on a
different number...
 
Any ideas before the rossers come and take me away?
 
Phil
 
 
Phil Knighton
Support Engineer
MJog Support Team  

  

 

 

Soft Option Technologies Ltd

The Old School, 23 High Street, Wilburton, Cambridgeshire, CB6 3RB

Tel: 01353 741641 |  Fax: 01353 741341  |  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  Web: www.mjog.com http://www.mjog.com/ 

MJogClockOriginal4.jpg___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] restart asterisk daily

2008-02-13 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:02:23PM +0100, Haan Patrick wrote:
 which distribution do you use?
 Maybe a Fedora 7

Debian Testing here.

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] What is a secure call?

2008-02-13 Thread Johansson Olle E
Friends,

The following mail was sent earlier to asterisk-dev and did not cause  
the amount of discussion I hoped it would.
Now that we have a way to secure signalling in IAX2 and SIP in  
Asterisk svn trunk, we need to start working on
the concept of a secure call - or does it really matter?

In SIP, there's a specification for how I as a domain owner can  
request all calls to my domain to use
SIP/TLS by using DNS NAPTR and SRV records. But how do I as a caller  
request a secure service?
How do we place a secure call with DIAL? Do we need SECUREDIAL?

Any ideas and thoughts on the subject are welcome!

Regards,
/Olle

- Copy of earlier mail -
(http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2007-July/028377.html)

To open a can of worms... :-)

I'm involved in Phil Zimmerman's efforts to integrate Zrtp into  
Asterisk. At the same time we have code for SRTP that needs to
be integrated.

This means that we will add the concept of a secure call in  
Asterisk. At some point, I want to be able to build dialplans
where I can manager security requirements on channels, like this  
conference is protected and requires a secure channel.

So, to make this easy, should we have a boolean flag and determine  
this is a secure call according to Asterisk Community
Security Standards or how should we  handle this? I think leaving it  
up to the admin is  the proper way to go, but we
also have several scenarios to consider

1. Encrypted signalling and media stream
1. Open signalling stream, key exchange in the open, encrypted media
2. Open signalling stream, secure key exchange, encrypted media
3. Secure signalling stream, un-encrypted media

exten = _x.,n,gotoif(${ISSECURECALL(level6)} ? approved,1 :  
hangup,1)

And to add to that, we have many different call scenarios.

1. Bridged call between two secure endpoints, Asterisk transcodes and  
have an unsecure media path
2. One-legged secure call between Asterisk and a phone (IVR)
3. SIP to ASterisk over IAX trunk to another Asterisk to SIP with SRTP/ 
TLS and encrypted IAX - but open
media path when going from SIP to IAX

And yes, of course, this is not attempting to be a complete list at all.

Can we simplify this and make it configurable? Do we want to?

Can we implement the notion of a trusted PBX that we allow being in  
the middle and untrusted PBXs
that we want to avoid or that changes the security property of a call.

As I said to Phil: A PBX is designed to be a man-in-the-middle attack.

There's certainly room for discussion, brainstorming and wild ideas  
here.

/O

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] urgent-channels

2008-02-13 Thread Jared Smith
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 11:33 +0200, Khaled Chehab wrote:
 I am using asterisk 1.2.4

Version 1.2.4 is really quite old (it was released in January of 2006,
so is more than 24 months old at this point), and there have been
hundreds of bugs fixed since then.  I'd really suggest you try a newer
version of Asterisk, either the 1.2.26.2 for the 1.2 branch, or 1.4.18
on the 1.4 branch.

-- 
Jared Smith
Community Relations Manager
Digium, Inc.


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] restart asterisk daily

2008-02-13 Thread Atis Lezdins
On 2/13/08, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:48:14PM +0800, Rilawich Ango wrote:
  Actually, I donno it is a memory leak or not.  I have a server only
  running asterisk.  As time goes by, the free memory shown in the top
  is decreased.  After I restart the asterisk, the free memory comes
  again.  That's why I wonder if regular restart asterisk is necessary.
  Use a crontab to restart asterisk is a way to do it but you have to
  maintain a crontab.  Is it possible to use logrotate instead?  Or
  other better way?

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free -m
  total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
 Mem:   485477  7  0  0100
 -/+ buffers/cache:376108
 Swap: 1419270   1149
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ top -b | head -n 5
 top - 10:18:32 up 19 days, 14:38, 24 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.33, 0.21
 Tasks: 166 total,   1 running, 163 sleeping,   2 stopped,   0 zombie
 Cpu(s):  1.1%us,  0.1%sy,  0.0%ni, 98.2%id,  0.5%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
 Mem:496648k total,   489044k used, 7604k free,   32k buffers
 Swap:  1453840k total,   276740k used,  1177100k free,   103380k cached
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps aux | grep asterisk
 asterisk  9559  0.0  2.5 474896 12892 ?Ssl  Feb12   0:00 
 /usr/sbin/asterisk -p -U asterisk

 Gee, I only have 7 MB free! I must reboot to free some memory! And that
 Asterisk is using so much memory!

Guys, don't start panic here. This is perfectly normal memory status
for Linux. Linux automatically uses most free memory for disk cache,
leaving only few megabytes, and frees disk cache as soon as any
application requests. This has nothing to do with Asterisk.

Regards,
Atis


 In fact:
 1. The system has some 100MB of free memory. almost all of it is used
 for caching and such.

 2. Asterisk overcommits memory: it generally asks the kernel huge
 ammounts of memory, but doesn't really try to use them. At least with
 Linux such overcommits are not claimed at all.

 --
Tzafrir Cohen
 icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-- 
Atis Lezdins
VoIP Developer,
IQ Labs Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: atis.lezdins
Cell Phone: +371 28806004
Work phone: +1 800 7502835

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] restart asterisk daily

2008-02-13 Thread ast erisk
So that´s why I´ve always get a red bar on home screen of the Trixbox?

Phisical memory is always at top most use, near 100% (green bar turns red on
high level of memory use), and below it there is Kernel / Application,
Buffers, Cached memory uses.

tks,






On Feb 13, 2008 12:51 PM, Atis Lezdins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 2/13/08, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:48:14PM +0800, Rilawich Ango wrote:
   Actually, I donno it is a memory leak or not.  I have a server only
   running asterisk.  As time goes by, the free memory shown in the top
   is decreased.  After I restart the asterisk, the free memory comes
   again.  That's why I wonder if regular restart asterisk is necessary.
   Use a crontab to restart asterisk is a way to do it but you have to
   maintain a crontab.  Is it possible to use logrotate instead?  Or
   other better way?
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ free -m
   total   used   free sharedbuffers
 cached
  Mem:   485477  7  0  0
  100
  -/+ buffers/cache:376108
  Swap: 1419270   1149
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ top -b | head -n 5
  top - 10:18:32 up 19 days, 14:38, 24 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.33,
 0.21
  Tasks: 166 total,   1 running, 163 sleeping,   2 stopped,   0 zombie
  Cpu(s):  1.1%us,  0.1%sy,  0.0%ni, 98.2%id,  0.5%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,
 0.0%st
  Mem:496648k total,   489044k used, 7604k free,   32k buffers
  Swap:  1453840k total,   276740k used,  1177100k free,   103380k cached
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps aux | grep asterisk
  asterisk  9559  0.0  2.5 474896 12892 ?Ssl  Feb12   0:00
 /usr/sbin/asterisk -p -U asterisk
 
  Gee, I only have 7 MB free! I must reboot to free some memory! And that
  Asterisk is using so much memory!

 Guys, don't start panic here. This is perfectly normal memory status
 for Linux. Linux automatically uses most free memory for disk cache,
 leaving only few megabytes, and frees disk cache as soon as any
 application requests. This has nothing to do with Asterisk.

 Regards,
 Atis

 
  In fact:
  1. The system has some 100MB of free memory. almost all of it is used
  for caching and such.
 
  2. Asterisk overcommits memory: it generally asks the kernel huge
  ammounts of memory, but doesn't really try to use them. At least with
  Linux such overcommits are not claimed at all.
 
  --
 Tzafrir Cohen
  icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  +972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
 
  ___
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


 --
 Atis Lezdins
 VoIP Developer,
 IQ Labs Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Skype: atis.lezdins
 Cell Phone: +371 28806004
 Work phone: +1 800 7502835

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] restart asterisk daily

2008-02-13 Thread Haan Patrick
which distribution do you use?
Maybe a Fedora 7

greez
patrick



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tzafrir Cohen
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 14:46
An: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Betreff: Re: [asterisk-users] restart asterisk daily [senderbase]


On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:31:11PM +0100, randulo wrote:
 On Feb 13, 2008 9:29 AM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  Gee, I only have 7 MB free! I must reboot to free some memory! And 
  that Asterisk is using so much memory!
 
 Do I detect a tiny bit of sarcasm here? Someone from Digium (or
 elsewhere) might be able to jump in and explain the asterisk memory 
 strategy and why it doesn't have any detrimental effects on anything 
 else running on the same system.

Sarcastic indeed. Indeed all those assertions were false.

Off-Topic:
The big memory consumer I have on my system is $GECKO_BROWSER. I currently have 
iceape (seamonkey), after just one day of operation:

tzafrir   8186  1.1 53.1 763016 264008 ?   Ssl  Feb12  19:23 
/usr/lib/iceape/iceape-bin

Iceweasel (firefox), epiphany and kazehakase don't seem to be much different.

So I have no issues with the little copy of Asterisk on my desktop system...

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 23:14:58 Alex Balashov wrote:
 Rizwan Hisham wrote:
  Hi all,
  I am planning to implement LCR routing on my already running asterisk
  server. Uptill now i have found out that asterisk has no support for
  lcr, i have to do something about it myself, for example using the AGI.
  Im looking for ideas here. Whats the best way to start implementing lcr
  in asterisk. Should i use agi and start implementing my own lcr script
  or is there any plugin available which can be used with asterisk.

 If you are interested in prebuilt solutions, you may consider
 TransNexus's NexOSS product (www.transnexus.com).  The Open Settlement
 Protocol (OSP) they implemented can be used with Asterisk - they have a
 module.  In fact, I am not sure about the commercial status of the OSP
 module as such;  it may be possible to get it free of charge.  Not sure.
   But OSP is an open protocol, so perhaps it's possible.

 Otherwise, I would think that the best way to approach this would be to
 make it fully outboard and divest it of Asterisk.  Implement a SIP proxy
 that forwards to providers using LCR decisionmaking, and just have
 Asterisk send calls to it.  OpenSER can be used for this - and indeed,
 there is an OSP module for it as well, if you wanted to go that route.

 If you're dead-set on doing it in Asterisk and don't want to do OSP, I
 would suggest FastAGI.  Definitely don't implement the logic in the dial
 plan, at any cost.

Uh, why not?  You can do LCR quite easily in the dialplan, by using func_odbc
for each of the provider lookups, then use SORT() to get the lowest cost.
It's quite easy, and you do not need to resort to AGI.

-- 
Tilghman

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] UK issue - Asterisk dialling 999... sort of

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Langstaff
It might be possible to get to the emergency service via 112 or a local
number as well.
 
Do you have *any* calls placed at about the time of the 999 calls?
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil
Knighton
Sent: 13 February 2008 14:12



Hello
 
This is a fun one for the list...
 
Twice now, the Police have contacted us to say they have had a
silent call then hangup from our landline number to the 999 service.  As
a matter of course, they follow up these calls in case someone is in
distress.  Nobody here was in distress - well, no more than normal!  The
Police aren't hugely happy when we tell them it must be a mistake.
 
Thing is, I have checked both our master log, and our dialled
calls log - and nobody dialled 999!  Each phone has an account code
applied from sip.conf, and we log all numbers dialled.  Nobody dialled
out.
 
There are no phones connected in anyway other than via Asterisk,
fax number is dealt with by a virtual machine, alarm system is on a
different number...
 
Any ideas before the rossers come and take me away?
 
Phil
http://www.mjog.com/  

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Digium's Exceptional Satisfaction Program

2008-02-13 Thread Jared Smith
As many of you may well know, Digium has been investing a great deal of
time and effort to build the very best telephony products in the
industry.  We're committed to producing the highest quality hardware and
software solutions, along with things like training and support to make
your Asterisk deployment a successful one.

As part of this effort, Digium is launching its Exceptional Satisfaction
Program.  

I won't bore you with all of the details here (see links below for more
detailed info), but in a nutshell we've extended the warranties on
almost our entire line of hardware and commercial software products, and
have thrown in a money-back guarantee as well. 

The blog post announcing the program can be found at
http://blogs.digium.com/2008/02/11/digium-puts-its-money-where-its-mouth-is/.  
The details of the program can be found at http://www.digium.com/ESP. We've 
also created a FAQ page at http://www.digium.com/en/company/riskfree-facts.php.

-- 
Jared Smith
Community Relations Manager
Digium, Inc.


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] is encrypted iax safe and secure?

2008-02-13 Thread Cavalera Claudio Luigi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Is it important for you to conceal that a call was made from
 abc to xyz on
 thus-and-such a date?  Or do you merely need to conceal the
 content of a
 call?  

I was thinking about concealing called and calling number in a generic
iax2 call, I hadn't even thinked about concealing the call itself. :-)

Another not so related question, during iax2 registration is username
Information Element always sent in clear?
I guess it is in clear since the first REGREQ even in the case of RSA or
MD5 based authentication.

Thanks,
Claudio


Internet Email Confidentiality Footer
-
La presente comunicazione, con le informazioni in essa contenute e ogni 
documento o file allegato, e' rivolta unicamente alla/e persona/e cui e' 
indirizzata ed alle altre da questa autorizzata/e a riceverla. Se non siete i 
destinatari/autorizzati siete avvisati che qualsiasi azione, copia, 
comunicazione, divulgazione o simili basate sul contenuto di tali informazioni 
e' vietata e potrebbe essere contro la legge (art. 616 C.P., D.Lgs n. 196/2003 
Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali). Se avete ricevuto questa 
comunicazione per errore, vi preghiamo di darne immediata notizia al mittente e 
di distruggere il messaggio originale e ogni file allegato senza farne copia 
alcuna o riprodurne in alcun modo il contenuto. 

This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only and are 
confidential and/or may contain legally privileged information. If you have 
received this message by mistake or are not one of the addressees above, you 
may take no action based on it, and you may not copy or show it to anyone; 
please reply to this e-mail and point out the error which has occurred. 
-


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] UK issue - Asterisk dialling 999... sort of

2008-02-13 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 08:12:25 Phil Knighton wrote:
 Thing is, I have checked both our master log, and our dialled calls log
 - and nobody dialled 999!  Each phone has an account code applied from
 sip.conf, and we log all numbers dialled.  Nobody dialled out.

Have you checked all numbers that might have a PREFIX of 999?  Here in the
States, occasionally a prankster will tell someone annoying her to call her on
her cell phone at 911-5924 or something like that, and of course, the system
only sees the 911 portion, not the additional 4 digits, which connects them
to the emergency number on this side of the Pond.

-- 
Tilghman

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] GXP2000 and asterisk 1.0.9

2008-02-13 Thread Giordano Grandis
Hi all gusy,
i have a big problem with gxp2000 and asterisk 1.0.9 The phones after a few go 
in busy state, if you call it get the busy tone but the phone can male any 
type of call.
This is my sip.conf
 
[502]
language = it
username = 502
secret = password
host = dynamic
type = friend
context = local
canreinvite = yes
dtmfmode = info
callgroup = 1
pickupgroup = 1
callerid = 502 502

Under Grandstream's support suggest, I set Use randmom port to yes and Nat 
traversal (STUN) to No, but send keep alive but without success.
This is the firmware version: Program-- 1.1.5.15Bootloader-- 1.1.5.6 
 
Anyone can help me ?
 
Thanks in advance
 
Giordano

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.4/1275 - Release Date: 12/02/2008 
15.20
 
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] FOSDEM in Brussells - Feb 23-24

2008-02-13 Thread Johansson Olle E
Friends,

I will be attending FOSDEM in Brussells Feb 23-24. Anyone else?

Me and Philippe Sultan (the Jabber/XMPP Asterisk developer) will be  
there, so we could have a SIP/XMPP/Asterisk ad hoc meeting :-)

On Thursday, Feb 21, I will be in Utrecht, Netherlands for the free  
Open Telephony conference at Media Plaza. There's still seats available
and a really good talk about ENUM with Patrik Fältström, Cisco/IETF.  
Join us there!

Register at
http://www.mediaplaza.nl/mp.php/mediaplaza/agenda/agenda.php?id=312

Regards,
/Olle
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Alex Balashov
Tilghman Lesher wrote:

 Uh, why not?  You can do LCR quite easily in the dialplan, by using func_odbc
 for each of the provider lookups, then use SORT() to get the lowest cost.
 It's quite easy, and you do not need to resort to AGI.

You can do almost anything in the dial plan with enough spiritual 
commitment in about the same way that you can do just about anything you 
need to do with a bash script, as opposed to Perl, Python, or any 
toolkits or frameworks.

It's not syntactically terse, balloons quickly in semantic complexity, 
is objectively less efficient as the dial plan *is not a programming 
language* (despite having variables, control structures and other things 
characteristic of an execution environment of such), and otherwise 
unnecessarily complicated.  In implementing and extending the logic 
going forward (beyond naive lookups) in accordance with evolving 
requirements in the business rules, you will find that you run into the 
limits of the algorithmic complexity that the dial plan can provide, and 
that whatever the approach, it's overly obfuscated.  The dial plan 
limits meaningful modularisation and functional decomposition that is 
available with outboard runtime environments.

So, it's not that you couldn't - it's that you shouldn't.

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Analog DID

2008-02-13 Thread Joe Pukepail
Does anyone have any suggestions for connecting analog DID trunks?  I have
some small locations that will have 2 analog DID trunks each, the only
solution that I can see will work will be using a channel bank and T1 card,
but it will be close to $1500 to terminate these DID trunks.  Was hoping
someone had some experience using an ATA or TDM card and analog DID trunks.

Rhino Channel Bank - $750
4 Port FXS module for channel bank - $150
T1 Card - $500
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Analog DID

2008-02-13 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:40:25AM -0600, Joe Pukepail wrote:
 Does anyone have any suggestions for connecting analog DID trunks?  

What is an analog DID trunk?

You want to connect phones to your Asterisk? Connect to the PSTN?

 I have
 some small locations that will have 2 analog DID trunks each, the only
 solution that I can see will work will be using a channel bank and T1 card,
 but it will be close to $1500 to terminate these DID trunks.  Was hoping
 someone had some experience using an ATA or TDM card and analog DID trunks.
 
 Rhino Channel Bank - $750
 4 Port FXS module for channel bank - $150
 T1 Card - $500

This is for providing plenty of analog extensions (phones). Is that what
you're after?

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and fax

2008-02-13 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo
Hi VoIPCrazy,
why don't you use an ATA device such as Grandstream 486 or similar?

Giorgio Incantalupo

voip crazy wrote:
 Dear list,

 I need to setup asterisk to send and receibe fax. I just looking about 
 SpanDSP, Hylafax/Iaxmodem, AsterFax,...etc.
 The asterisk box has Digium hardware, one TE420B and one TDM2402 (8 
 FXO ports).

 I just read the SpanDSP (txfax and rxfax) makes the system more 
 unstable that Hylafax/Iaxmodem.
 And the Asterfax solution does dislike cause its licensing.

 The TE420B, is configured in E1 mode.

 Which is the best solution to use with this hardware? 
 Which solution do you use to send an receibe fax?

 Thanks

 VoIPCrazy



 

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 

_
Giorgio Incantalupo, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FGA srl - http://www.fgasoftware.com -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - The Agile PBX http://www.voiceatwork.eu
Tel: 02997663.14, Fax: 0291390172  


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk and fax

2008-02-13 Thread voip crazy
Dear list,

I need to setup asterisk to send and receibe fax. I just looking about
SpanDSP, Hylafax/Iaxmodem, AsterFax,...etc.
The asterisk box has Digium hardware, one TE420B and one TDM2402 (8 FXO
ports).

I just read the SpanDSP (txfax and rxfax) makes the system more unstable
that Hylafax/Iaxmodem.
And the Asterfax solution does dislike cause its licensing.

The TE420B, is configured in E1 mode.

Which is the best solution to use with this hardware?
Which solution do you use to send an receibe fax?

Thanks

VoIPCrazy
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] What is a secure call?

2008-02-13 Thread Matthew Rubenstein
If Asterisk does indeed use SECUREDIAL or similar as distinct from
DIAL, then DIAL should wrap SECUREDIAL for calls to a party that are
secure. This would parallel HTTP GET (or POST) which use the same
function entry for both secure and insecure connections, wrapping their
secure access inside generic access.

To continue the parallel, the dialstring should indicate whether
SIP/TLS (and otherwise for IAX) is to be used, which should allow the
DIAL function to determine whether to make a secure connection. To go
further, if SECUREDIAL is invoked on a dialstring which does not specify
a secure connection, that invocation should at least flag the insecure
connection attempt, or even fail with an exception.

I'm not sure that the SIP spec allows a request for an insecure
connection to be rejected with instructions for requesting a secure
call. But if it does, then the DIAL function should allow logic for
options on the retry, like just failing with exception report or a list
of dialstrings to retry. Or maybe just an extention to jump to with the
failure in a variable, for the dialplan/AGI/etc able to use that status
for logic on retry or fail.

In general, the closer the DIAL function works to familiar Web
retrieval functions, the more Web programming techniques will be
applicable to Asterisk programming.


On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 10:40 -0600,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:22:10 +0100
 From: Johansson Olle E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [asterisk-users] What is a secure call?
 To: Asterisk Non-Commercial Discussion Users Mailing List -
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
 
 Friends,
 
 The following mail was sent earlier to asterisk-dev and did not
 cause  
 the amount of discussion I hoped it would.
 Now that we have a way to secure signalling in IAX2 and SIP in  
 Asterisk svn trunk, we need to start working on
 the concept of a secure call - or does it really matter?
 
 In SIP, there's a specification for how I as a domain owner can  
 request all calls to my domain to use
 SIP/TLS by using DNS NAPTR and SRV records. But how do I as a caller  
 request a secure service?
 How do we place a secure call with DIAL? Do we need SECUREDIAL?
 
 Any ideas and thoughts on the subject are welcome!
 
 Regards,
 /Olle
 
 - Copy of earlier mail -
 (http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2007-July/028377.html)
 
 To open a can of worms... :-)
 
 I'm involved in Phil Zimmerman's efforts to integrate Zrtp into  
 Asterisk. At the same time we have code for SRTP that needs to
 be integrated.
 
 This means that we will add the concept of a secure call in  
 Asterisk. At some point, I want to be able to build dialplans
 where I can manager security requirements on channels, like this  
 conference is protected and requires a secure channel.
 
 So, to make this easy, should we have a boolean flag and determine  
 this is a secure call according to Asterisk Community
 Security Standards or how should we  handle this? I think leaving
 it  
 up to the admin is  the proper way to go, but we
 also have several scenarios to consider
 
 1. Encrypted signalling and media stream
 1. Open signalling stream, key exchange in the open, encrypted media
 2. Open signalling stream, secure key exchange, encrypted media
 3. Secure signalling stream, un-encrypted media
 
 exten = _x.,n,gotoif(${ISSECURECALL(level6)} ? approved,1 :  
 hangup,1)
 
 And to add to that, we have many different call scenarios.
 
 1. Bridged call between two secure endpoints, Asterisk transcodes
 and  
 have an unsecure media path
 2. One-legged secure call between Asterisk and a phone (IVR)
 3. SIP to ASterisk over IAX trunk to another Asterisk to SIP with
 SRTP/ 
 TLS and encrypted IAX - but open
 media path when going from SIP to IAX
 
 And yes, of course, this is not attempting to be a complete list at
 all.
 
 Can we simplify this and make it configurable? Do we want to?
 
 Can we implement the notion of a trusted PBX that we allow being
 in  
 the middle and untrusted PBXs
 that we want to avoid or that changes the security property of a call.
 
 As I said to Phil: A PBX is designed to be a man-in-the-middle
 attack.
 
 There's certainly room for discussion, brainstorming and wild ideas  
 here.
 
 /O
 
 
-- 

(C) Matthew Rubenstein


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Analog DID

2008-02-13 Thread darren


An analog DID trunk is a line (typically part of a group) that has a group of numbers assigned to it at the telco side. They work in a variety of ways depending on the telco. One example is the trunks as Telus provides them. The end user provides dialtone back to the telco. When a call comes in on a DID the telco picks up the first available line (remember, the customer is providing dial tone.) and dials the last 4 digits of the dialed number. They are often replaced by PRIs but in some locations a PRI is not affordable and these provide the same DID functionality for a small fraction of the price.Darren Wiebe[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 13 2008 10:11:44 AM MST from Tzafrir Cohen to asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Analog DIDOn Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:40:25AM -0600, Joe Pukepail wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions for connecting analog DID trunks?What is an analog DID trunk?You want to connect phones to your Asterisk? Connect to the PSTN? I have some small locations that will have 2 analog DID trunks each, the only solution that I can see will work will be using a channel bank and T1 card, but it will be close to $1500 to terminate these DID trunks.  Was hoping someone had some experience using an ATA or TDM card and analog DID trunks. Rhino Channel Bank - $750 4 Port FXS module for channel bank - $150 T1 Card - $500This is for providing plenty of analog extensions (phones). Is that whatyou're after?--   Tzafrir Cohenicq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir___-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] FOSDEM in Brussells - Feb 23-24

2008-02-13 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 16:59, Wed 13 Feb 08, Johansson Olle E wrote:
 Friends,
 
 I will be attending FOSDEM in Brussells Feb 23-24. Anyone else?

I'll be there (what a suprise eh ?)

 
 Me and Philippe Sultan (the Jabber/XMPP Asterisk developer) will be  
 there, so we could have a SIP/XMPP/Asterisk ad hoc meeting :-)

yeah, we should meet and checkout the supply of Gulden Draak

 
 On Thursday, Feb 21, I will be in Utrecht, Netherlands for the free  
 Open Telephony conference at Media Plaza. There's still seats available
 and a really good talk about ENUM with Patrik F?ltstr?m, Cisco/IETF.  
 Join us there!

I'll be there as well.

 
 Register at
 http://www.mediaplaza.nl/mp.php/mediaplaza/agenda/agenda.php?id=312

meh, I was registered before I knew ;)

 
 Regards,
 /Olle

-- 

Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD

Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users?


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:33:19AM -0600, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
 On Wednesday 13 February 2008 09:57:59 Alex Balashov wrote:
  Tilghman Lesher wrote:
   Uh, why not?  You can do LCR quite easily in the dialplan, by using
   func_odbc for each of the provider lookups, then use SORT() to get the
   lowest cost. It's quite easy, and you do not need to resort to AGI.
 
  You can do almost anything in the dial plan with enough spiritual
  commitment in about the same way that you can do just about anything you
  need to do with a bash script, as opposed to Perl, Python, or any
  toolkits or frameworks.
 
  It's not syntactically terse, balloons quickly in semantic complexity,
  is objectively less efficient as the dial plan *is not a programming
  language* (despite having variables, control structures and other things
  characteristic of an execution environment of such), and otherwise
  unnecessarily complicated.  In implementing and extending the logic
  going forward (beyond naive lookups) in accordance with evolving
  requirements in the business rules, you will find that you run into the
  limits of the algorithmic complexity that the dial plan can provide, and
  that whatever the approach, it's overly obfuscated.  The dial plan
  limits meaningful modularisation and functional decomposition that is
  available with outboard runtime environments.
 
 Like any other language, you certainly can write in an obfuscated way, and
 the dialplan does not discourage it.  That said, you certainly can write in a
 modularized way.  I would guess that you simply aren't familiar with the
 dialplan enough to make those decisions, but it is quite possible and doable.
 
  So, it's not that you couldn't - it's that you shouldn't.
 
 In the same way that a PHP programmer should not attempt write Python the
 way she writes PHP, I would agree with you.  However, if you're willing to
 adapt to the ways the dialplan works, you can create dialplans which aren't
 obfuscated at all.  Tcl and Lisp are close cousins to the dialplan in terms of
 how they do things.  Not everybody is a Lisp programmer, and some people
 absolutely detest it.  That doesn't make it any less of a good language.

Having programmed in about 8 different languages over the last 25
years, I can see both points of view.  And admittedly, I haven't tried
to do non-trivial things with dialplan.

That said, my view of this interaction is that Tilghman has drunk the
Kool-Aidtm, and that Alex's view of the situation is much closer to
objective.

dialplan appears to have jes' growed, and that never makes for a good
language design.  Ask the Python 3 team.  :-)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274

 Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
 Those who count the vote decide everything.
   -- (Joseph Stalin)


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 09:57:59 Alex Balashov wrote:
 Tilghman Lesher wrote:
  Uh, why not?  You can do LCR quite easily in the dialplan, by using
  func_odbc for each of the provider lookups, then use SORT() to get the
  lowest cost. It's quite easy, and you do not need to resort to AGI.

 You can do almost anything in the dial plan with enough spiritual
 commitment in about the same way that you can do just about anything you
 need to do with a bash script, as opposed to Perl, Python, or any
 toolkits or frameworks.

 It's not syntactically terse, balloons quickly in semantic complexity,
 is objectively less efficient as the dial plan *is not a programming
 language* (despite having variables, control structures and other things
 characteristic of an execution environment of such), and otherwise
 unnecessarily complicated.  In implementing and extending the logic
 going forward (beyond naive lookups) in accordance with evolving
 requirements in the business rules, you will find that you run into the
 limits of the algorithmic complexity that the dial plan can provide, and
 that whatever the approach, it's overly obfuscated.  The dial plan
 limits meaningful modularisation and functional decomposition that is
 available with outboard runtime environments.

Like any other language, you certainly can write in an obfuscated way, and
the dialplan does not discourage it.  That said, you certainly can write in a
modularized way.  I would guess that you simply aren't familiar with the
dialplan enough to make those decisions, but it is quite possible and doable.

 So, it's not that you couldn't - it's that you shouldn't.

In the same way that a PHP programmer should not attempt write Python the
way she writes PHP, I would agree with you.  However, if you're willing to
adapt to the ways the dialplan works, you can create dialplans which aren't
obfuscated at all.  Tcl and Lisp are close cousins to the dialplan in terms of
how they do things.  Not everybody is a Lisp programmer, and some people
absolutely detest it.  That doesn't make it any less of a good language.

-- 
Tilghman

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Analog DID

2008-02-13 Thread James Finstrom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Rhino's Analog cards support analog DID. no need for all the extra
stuff You will want to get an R8FXX with fxs modules that will give
you channels in sets of 2.

ADID has not really taken off in the OS telephony market I think due
to a lack of understanding people stay with the proprietary phone
systems that pimp this feature. Okay so I will take the lead and pimp
it for asterisk. With Rhino Analog cards you CAN do ADID with no extra
equipment. However if you want to spend the money we can go the other
route :)

darren wrote:

 An analog DID trunk is a line (typically part of a group) that has
 a group of numbers assigned to it at the telco side.  They work in
 a variety of ways depending on the telco.  One example is the
 trunks as Telus provides them.  The end user provides dialtone back
 to the telco.  When a call comes in on a DID the telco picks up the
 first available line (remember, the customer is providing dial
 tone.) and dials the last 4 digits of the dialed number.  They are
 often replaced by PRIs but in some locations a PRI is not
 affordable and these provide the same DID functionality for a small
 fraction of the price.



 Darren Wiebe

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 Wed Feb 13 2008 10:11:44 AM MST from Tzafrir Cohen to
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]
 Analog DID

 On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:40:25AM -0600, Joe Pukepail wrote:

 Does anyone have any suggestions for connecting analog DID
 trunks?


 What is an analog DID trunk?

 You want to connect phones to your Asterisk? Connect to the PSTN?

 I have some small locations that will have 2 analog DID trunks
 each, the only
 solution that I can see will work will be using a channel
 bank and T1 card,
 but it will be close to $1500 to terminate these DID
 trunks. Was hoping
 someone had some experience using an ATA or TDM card and
 analog DID trunks.

 Rhino Channel Bank - $750 4 Port FXS module for channel bank -
 $150 T1 Card - $500


 This is for providing plenty of analog extensions (phones). Is that
 what you're after?

 -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

 ___ -- Bandwidth and
 Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 !DSPAM:47b327c1163231152562594!

 --


 ___ -- Bandwidth and
 Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 !DSPAM:47b327c1163231152562594!

- --
James Finstrom
Rhino Equipment Corp.
Tel: 1-800-785-7073  ext. 6344
FAX: +1 (480) 961-1826
IP: asterisk.rhinoequipment.com ext 6344
FWD: 633686 ext 6344

THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and its
attachments from all computers.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFHsynrdloC7YyaIOoRAuKhAJiCRxUX+E7rzt6/A5nyAjXdO5yaAJ4/HoKB
Gxd6H7YOdzXfygVuBygzAw==
=51QY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and fax

2008-02-13 Thread voip crazy
I want to receibe the fax via mail and send faxes via web interface and a
digital send and receibe fax list.

Voipcrazy

2008/2/13, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi VoIPCrazy,
 why don't you use an ATA device such as Grandstream 486 or similar?

 Giorgio Incantalupo

 voip crazy wrote:
  Dear list,
 
  I need to setup asterisk to send and receibe fax. I just looking about
  SpanDSP, Hylafax/Iaxmodem, AsterFax,...etc.
  The asterisk box has Digium hardware, one TE420B and one TDM2402 (8
  FXO ports).
 
  I just read the SpanDSP (txfax and rxfax) makes the system more
  unstable that Hylafax/Iaxmodem.
  And the Asterfax solution does dislike cause its licensing.
 
  The TE420B, is configured in E1 mode.
 
  Which is the best solution to use with this hardware?
  Which solution do you use to send an receibe fax?
 
  Thanks
 
  VoIPCrazy
 
 
 
  
 
  ___
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 --

 _
 Giorgio Incantalupo, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 FGA srl - http://www.fgasoftware.com -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The Agile PBX http://www.voiceatwork.eu
 Tel: 02997663.14, Fax: 0291390172


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] ISDN PRIs and taking a server down for maintenance - blocking issue

2008-02-13 Thread Andrew Smith
Hi there,
 
I currently have multiple Asterisk servers using Sangoma A104d Quad ISDN
E1s.

Basically our telco is presenting calls in order of the ISDNs on our
servers.
 
SERVER1=1,2,3,4
SERVER2=5,6,7,8
 
We have redundancy in that if SERVER1 is shutdown then each ISDN PRI is in
alarm and the calls will then presented to PRIs 5,6,7,8 on SERVER2.

If I have to take SERVER1 offline for maintenance (asterisk -rx shutdown
gracefully) any incoming calls receive a BUSY tone.

What I would like to know is if there is anyway to get around this and not
send a BUSY back to our callers and somehow allow our telco to present calls
immediately to SERVER2.

Anyone have any ideas or are we stuck with this behaviour until the calls
drop to 0 and Asterisk shuts down ?

Thanks,
Andrew
 
 
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] ISDN PRIs and taking a server down for maintenance - blocking issue

2008-02-13 Thread Tim Nelson
Even if * is shutdown, zaptel is still running and your ISDN channels are still 
technically up. Shutting down zaptel should close the channels and put those 
circuits into alarm mode. 

Tim Nelson 
Systems/Network Support 
Rockbochs Inc. 
(218)727-4332 

- Original Message - 
From: Andrew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 12:03:51 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago 
Subject: [asterisk-users] ISDN PRIs and taking a server down for maintenance - 
blocking issue 



Hi there, 

I currently have multiple Asterisk servers using Sangoma A104d Quad ISDN E1s. 

Basically our telco is presenting calls in order of the ISDNs on our servers. 

SERVER1=1,2,3,4 
SERVER2=5,6,7,8 

We have redundancy in that if SERVER1 is shutdown then each ISDN PRI is in 
alarm and the calls will then presented to PRIs 5,6,7,8 on SERVER2. 

If I have to take SERVER1 offline for maintenance (asterisk -rx shutdown 
gracefully) any incoming calls receive a BUSY tone. 

What I would like to know is if there is anyway to get around this and not send 
a BUSY back to our callers and somehow allow our telco to present calls 
immediately to SERVER2. 

Anyone have any ideas or are we stuck with this behaviour until the calls drop 
to 0 and Asterisk shuts down ? 

Thanks, 
Andrew 

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Douglas Garstang
- Original Message 
From: Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:45:34 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

On 
Wed, 
Feb 
13, 
2008 
at 
11:33:19AM 
-0600, 
Tilghman 
Lesher 
wrote:
 
On 
Wednesday 
13 
February 
2008 
09:57:59 
Alex 
Balashov 
wrote:
 
 
Tilghman 
Lesher 
wrote:
 
 
 
Uh, 
why 
not?  
You 
can 
do 
LCR 
quite 
easily 
in 
the 
dialplan, 
by 
using
 
 
 
func_odbc 
for 
each 
of 
the 
provider 
lookups, 
then 
use 
SORT() 
to 
get 
the
 
 
 
lowest 
cost. 
It's 
quite 
easy, 
and 
you 
do 
not 
need 
to 
resort 
to 
AGI.
 

 
 
You 
can 
do 
almost 
anything 
in 
the 
dial 
plan 
with 
enough 
spiritual
 
 
commitment 
in 
about 
the 
same 
way 
that 
you 
can 
do 
just 
about 
anything 
you
 
 
need 
to 
do 
with 
a 
bash 
script, 
as 
opposed 
to 
Perl, 
Python, 
or 
any
 
 
toolkits 
or 
frameworks.

Is that nasty little problem of no local variables in macros fixed yet? That's 
a pretty big pain in the ass. You have to prefix your variables with the name 
of the macro it's in to avoid stepping all over yourself.

Doug.






  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and fax

2008-02-13 Thread Ricardo Carvalho
I'm at this moment implementing the same as you do...
Take a look at the following links:

http://blog.evaristesys.com/?p=24
http://blogtech.oc9.com/index.php?option=com_contentview=articlecatid=4:asteriskid=77:20071121astItemid=6
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+fax

Regards,
Ricardo Carvalho.





On Feb 13, 2008 5:49 PM, voip crazy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I want to receibe the fax via mail and send faxes via web interface and a
 digital send and receibe fax list.

 Voipcrazy

 2008/2/13, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  Hi VoIPCrazy,
  why don't you use an ATA device such as Grandstream 486 or similar?
 
  Giorgio Incantalupo
 
  voip crazy wrote:
   Dear list,
  
   I need to setup asterisk to send and receibe fax. I just looking about
   SpanDSP, Hylafax/Iaxmodem, AsterFax,...etc.
   The asterisk box has Digium hardware, one TE420B and one TDM2402 (8
   FXO ports).
  
   I just read the SpanDSP (txfax and rxfax) makes the system more
   unstable that Hylafax/Iaxmodem.
   And the Asterfax solution does dislike cause its licensing.
  
   The TE420B, is configured in E1 mode.
  
   Which is the best solution to use with this hardware?
   Which solution do you use to send an receibe fax?
  
   Thanks
  
   VoIPCrazy
  
  
  
  
  
  
   ___
   -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
  --
 
  _
  Giorgio Incantalupo, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  FGA srl - http://www.fgasoftware.com -
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The Agile PBX http://www.voiceatwork.eu
  Tel: 02997663.14, Fax: 0291390172
 
 
  ___
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Philipp Kempgen
Douglas Garstang wrote:
 - Original Message 
 From: Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:45:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk
 
 On 
 Wed, 
 Feb 
 13, 
 2008 
 at 
 11:33:19AM 
 -0600, 
 Tilghman 
 Lesher 
 wrote:
 On 
 Wednesday 
 13 
 February 
 2008 
 09:57:59 
 Alex 
 Balashov 
 wrote:

 Tilghman 
 Lesher 
 wrote:


 Uh, 
 why 
 not?  
 You 
 can 
 do 
 LCR 
 quite 
 easily 
 in 
 the 
 dialplan, 
 by 
 using


 func_odbc 
 for 
 each 
 of 
 the 
 provider 
 lookups, 
 then 
 use 
 SORT() 
 to 
 get 
 the


 lowest 
 cost. 
 It's 
 quite 
 easy, 
 and 
 you 
 do 
 not 
 need 
 to 
 resort 
 to 
 AGI.



 You 
 can 
 do 
 almost 
 anything 
 in 
 the 
 dial 
 plan 
 with 
 enough 
 spiritual

 commitment 
 in 
 about 
 the 
 same 
 way 
 that 
 you 
 can 
 do 
 just 
 about 
 anything 
 you

 need 
 to 
 do 
 with 
 a 
 bash 
 script, 
 as 
 opposed 
 to 
 Perl, 
 Python, 
 or 
 any

 toolkits 
 or 
 frameworks.

Could you fix your e-mail client please?

Regards,
  Philipp Kempgen

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 11:45:34 Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
 Having programmed in about 8 different languages over the last 25
 years, I can see both points of view.  And admittedly, I haven't tried
 to do non-trivial things with dialplan.

 That said, my view of this interaction is that Tilghman has drunk the
 Kool-Aidtm, and that Alex's view of the situation is much closer to
 objective.

Or maybe I'm just the architect of the dialplan moving forward, which is why
I advocate that if you really don't need to use AGI, you don't.  ;-)

 dialplan appears to have jes' growed, and that never makes for a good
 language design.  Ask the Python 3 team.  :-)

I'm specifically working on removing misfeatures from the dialplan, to make
it much easier to use and more predictable.  1.6 will be a huge improvement
towards this goal.

-- 
Tilghman

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] MWI problem with Siemens Gigaset S675 IP

2008-02-13 Thread Jaap Winius
Hi list,

Before purchasing a number of Siemens DECT SIP phones, the Gigaset  
S675 IP, I read that the problems with MWI had been fixed with the  
latest firmware version (see  
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Siemens+Gigaset+S675IP). Now I'm  
not so sure that's the case.

After setting up a network mailbox for one of these phones, as well as  
an Asterisk voicemail account (ext. 1000) in voicemail.conf's default  
context, I added the following line to my phone's context in sip.conf:

   mailbox=1000

However, soon after executing a 'sip reload' on the console, the  
following error message will appear every three minutes:

   [Feb 13 19:18:22] WARNING[14171]: chan_sip.c:12621 handle_response:
Remote host can't match request NOTIFY to call
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Giving up.

The IP address belongs to my server. At the same time, I used tcpdump  
to see what else might be going on. I found the following:

   19:18:22.540113 IP bitis.umrk.to.sip  gigaset.umrk.to.sip: SIP, length: 545
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .)..NOTIFY sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
   Via: SIP/2.0
   19:18:22.571452 IP gigaset.umrk.to.sip  bitis.umrk.to.sip: SIP, length: 308
   E..P...f...
   .a_SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
   Via:

The latest comment on the voip-info.org page above outlines the same  
problem. Can anyone here confirm that this is indeed a Siemens  
problem, or might it be an Asterisk problem after all?

I'm running Asterisk v1.4.14 on a Debian etch server.

Thanks,

Jaap

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Ira
At 09:33 AM 2/13/2008, you wrote:
In the same way that a PHP programmer should not attempt write Python the
way she writes PHP, I would agree with you.  However, if you're willing to
adapt to the ways the dialplan works, you can create dialplans which aren't
obfuscated at all.  Tcl and Lisp are close cousins to the dialplan in terms of
how they do things.  Not everybody is a Lisp programmer, and some people
absolutely detest it.  That doesn't make it any less of a good language.

Look, I've done lots of cool stuff in the dial plan and other have 
done stuff way beyond me, but I defy you to call the dial plan 
language good or well designed. It works, it gets the job done but 
it's always harder than it needs to be.

Ira 


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Analog DID

2008-02-13 Thread darren


Hey, that's cool! I wish I'd known that 6 months ago.Darren Wiebe[EMAIL PROTECTED]Wed Feb 13 2008 10:33:31 AM MST from James Finstrom to Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion  Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Analog DID-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Rhino's Analog cards support analog DID. no need for all the extrastuff You will want to get an R8FXX with fxs modules that will giveyou channels in sets of 2.ADID has not really taken off in the OS telephony market I think dueto a lack of understanding people stay with the proprietary phonesystems that pimp this feature. Okay so I will take the lead and pimpit for asterisk. With Rhino Analog cards you CAN do ADID with no extraequipment. However if you want to spend the money we can go the otherroute :)darren wrote: An analog DID trunk is a line (typically part of a group) that has a group of numbers assigned to it at the telco side.  They work in a variety of ways depending on the telco.  One example is the trunks as Telus provides them.  The end user provides dialtone back to the telco.  When a call comes in on a DID the telco picks up the first available line (remember, the customer is providing dial tone.) and dials the last 4 digits of the dialed number.  They are often replaced by PRIs but in some locations a PRI is not affordable and these provide the same DID functionality for a small fraction of the price. Darren Wiebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 13 2008 10:11:44 AM MST from Tzafrir Cohen to asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Analog DID On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:40:25AM -0600, Joe Pukepail wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions for connecting analog DID trunks? What is an analog DID trunk? You want to connect phones to your Asterisk? Connect to the PSTN? I have some small locations that will have 2 analog DID trunks each, the only solution that I can see will work will be using a channel bank and T1 card, but it will be close to $1500 to terminate these DID trunks. Was hoping someone had some experience using an ATA or TDM card and analog DID trunks. Rhino Channel Bank - $750 4 Port FXS module for channel bank - $150 T1 Card - $500 This is for providing plenty of analog extensions (phones). Is that what you're after? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users !DSPAM:47b327c1163231152562594! -- ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users !DSPAM:47b327c1163231152562594!- --James FinstromRhino Equipment Corp.Tel: 1-800-785-7073  ext. 6344FAX: +1 (480) 961-1826IP: asterisk.rhinoequipment.com ext 6344FWD: 633686 ext 6344THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARYMATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If youreceivedthis in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and itsattachments from all computers.-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.orgiD4DBQFHsynrdloC7YyaIOoRAuKhAJiCRxUX+E7rzt6/A5nyAjXdO5yaAJ4/HoKBGxd6H7YOdzXfygVuBygzAw===51QY-END PGP SIGNATURE-___-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and fax

2008-02-13 Thread Carlos Chavez
I would recommend you use Iaxmodem / Hylafax / Avantfax for your needs.
We use this with several customers and it works very well.  This way you
do not have to patch Asterisk with spanDSP.  You can set up as many
virtual fax machines as your machine will handle.  

On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 18:49 +0100, voip crazy wrote:
 I want to receibe the fax via mail and send faxes via web interface
 and a digital send and receibe fax list.
 
 Voipcrazy
 
 2008/2/13, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Hi VoIPCrazy,
 why don't you use an ATA device such as Grandstream 486 or
 similar?
 
 Giorgio Incantalupo
 
 voip crazy wrote:
  Dear list,
 
  I need to setup asterisk to send and receibe fax. I just
 looking about
  SpanDSP, Hylafax/Iaxmodem, AsterFax,...etc.
  The asterisk box has Digium hardware, one TE420B and one
 TDM2402 (8
  FXO ports).
 
  I just read the SpanDSP (txfax and rxfax) makes the system
 more
  unstable that Hylafax/Iaxmodem.
  And the Asterfax solution does dislike cause its licensing.
 
  The TE420B, is configured in E1 mode.
 
  Which is the best solution to use with this hardware?
  Which solution do you use to send an receibe fax?
 
  Thanks
 
  VoIPCrazy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
 http://www.api-digital.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 --
 
 _
 Giorgio Incantalupo, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 FGA srl - http://www.fgasoftware.com -
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The Agile PBX http://www.voiceatwork.eu
 Tel: 02997663.14, Fax: 0291390172
 
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
 http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V.
Carlos Chávez Prats
Director de Tecnología
+52-55-91169161 ext 2001


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Tilghman Lesher
Doug-

Please fix your email client.  One line per word in quoting is a little
excessive.  Better yet, turn off HTML.

On Wednesday 13 February 2008 12:17:30 Douglas Garstang wrote:
 Is that nasty little problem of no local variables in macros fixed yet?
 That's a pretty big pain in the ass. You have to prefix your variables with
 the name of the macro it's in to avoid stepping all over yourself.

Macros are deprecated.  Gosubs are the way forward, and yes, they have
local variables.  Simply define them once as Set(LOCAL(foo)=bar) and foo
will be gone when the innermost stack is removed (either by Return or
StackPop).

-- 
Tilghman

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:52:42PM -0600, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
 On Wednesday 13 February 2008 11:45:34 Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
  Having programmed in about 8 different languages over the last 25
  years, I can see both points of view.  And admittedly, I haven't tried
  to do non-trivial things with dialplan.
 
  That said, my view of this interaction is that Tilghman has drunk the
  Kool-Aidtm, and that Alex's view of the situation is much closer to
  objective.
 
 Or maybe I'm just the architect of the dialplan moving forward, which is why
 I advocate that if you really don't need to use AGI, you don't.  ;-)

I'm not sure those aren't equivalent.  :-)

  dialplan appears to have jes' growed, and that never makes for a good
  language design.  Ask the Python 3 team.  :-)
 
 I'm specifically working on removing misfeatures from the dialplan, to make
 it much easier to use and more predictable.  1.6 will be a huge improvement
 towards this goal.

Well, this should be interesting.  :-)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274

 Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
 Those who count the vote decide everything.
   -- (Joseph Stalin)


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:49:36PM +0100, Philipp Kempgen wrote:
 Douglas Garstang wrote:
[ ... ]
  do 
  with 
  a 
  bash 
  script, 
  as 
  opposed 
  to 
  Perl, 
  Python, 
  or 
  any
 
  toolkits 
  or 
  frameworks.
 
 Could you fix your e-mail client please?

I dunno; his message comes out fine here, though Mutt and lynx --dump.

I grow less impressed with T-bird by the day...

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274

 Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
 Those who count the vote decide everything.
   -- (Joseph Stalin)


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LCR in Asterisk

2008-02-13 Thread Alex Balashov
Tilghman Lesher wrote:

 Like any other language, you certainly can write in an obfuscated way, and
 the dialplan does not discourage it.  That said, you certainly can write in a
 modularized way.  I would guess that you simply aren't familiar with the
 dialplan enough to make those decisions, but it is quite possible and doable.

The dial plan certainly does lend itself to this to some degree, no 
argument, but not to the extent that fully developed programming / 
scripting languages do.


-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] PCI32 and PCI-X compatibility

2008-02-13 Thread Michael Spiceland

 this is my 1st message, I'm writing to ask if anyone knows if a PCI32
 card like the TDM400P (quad analog) or the B410P (quad BRI) is working
 on a PCI-X bus, at 100MHz or 133 MHz. I'm really stuck with this,
 since I found a partial yes on this mailing list but my supplier says
 no!

Marco,

You should not have any issues using a PCI card in a PCI-X slot, as long as the 
card is a 3.3V PCI card.  The cards that you mention above are 3.3v compatible 
and you should be able to use them.

All of Digium's product line is available for 3.3v slots.  Most are universal 
and can be used in 3.3v or 5v slots.  The only exceptions are the dual and quad 
span T1/E1 digital cards.  For those cards, there are 3.3v variants (TE410P and 
TE210P) and 5v variants (TE405P and TE410P).

--
Michael Spiceland

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] GXP2000 and asterisk 1.0.9

2008-02-13 Thread C F
Just check DND if it's on on the phone or not.
What is the CLI output when you try making a phone call?
Why don't you try it with a later version of astrisk and a Phone?

On Feb 13, 2008 10:58 AM, Giordano Grandis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi all gusy,
 i have a big problem with gxp2000 and asterisk 1.0.9 The phones after a few
 go in busy state, if you call it get the busy tone but the phone can male
 any type of call.
 This is my sip.conf

 [502]
 language = it
 username = 502
 secret = password
 host = dynamic
 type = friend
 context = local
 canreinvite = yes
 dtmfmode = info
 callgroup = 1
 pickupgroup = 1
 callerid = 502 502

 Under Grandstream's support suggest, I set Use randmom port to yes and
 Nat traversal (STUN) to No, but send keep alive but without success.
 This is the firmware version: Program-- 1.1.5.15Bootloader-- 1.1.5.6

 Anyone can help me ?

 Thanks in advance

 Giordano


 No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.4/1275 - Release Date: 12/02/2008
 15.20

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk Manager and Visual Basic

2008-02-13 Thread Bill Andersen
Has anyone tried to used VB6 to communicate with the Asterisk Manager?

If so, would you be willing to share some basic code showing your
approach to getting connected and parsing results?

I've got a Telnet control that is allowing me to connect, authenticate
and see the flow of status, etc., but I'm sure there is a better way
to do this without using Telnet (maybe not?).  Any suggestions?

I want to write a presence monitor (a virtual sidecar if you will)

Bill



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] [Linux/Python 2.4.2] Forking Python doesn't work

2008-02-13 Thread Vincent
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:59:38 -0200, Diego Aguirre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
try to use System() instead of AGI()

Thanks, but no go. I get an error:

[Feb 13 21:57:55] WARNING[2138]: app_system.c:107 system_exec_helper:
Unable to execute '/tmp/netcid.py|2000|Joe'


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] MWI problem with Siemens Gigaset S675 IP

2008-02-13 Thread Henry Devito
Try adding [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (or what ever your voicemail contexxt is)

I've had to add the voicemail context to get MWI to work correctly in the 
past.
- Original Message - 
From: Jaap Winius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 12:45 PM
Subject: [asterisk-users] MWI problem with Siemens Gigaset S675 IP


 Hi list,

 Before purchasing a number of Siemens DECT SIP phones, the Gigaset
 S675 IP, I read that the problems with MWI had been fixed with the
 latest firmware version (see
 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Siemens+Gigaset+S675IP). Now I'm
 not so sure that's the case.

 After setting up a network mailbox for one of these phones, as well as
 an Asterisk voicemail account (ext. 1000) in voicemail.conf's default
 context, I added the following line to my phone's context in sip.conf:

   mailbox=1000

 However, soon after executing a 'sip reload' on the console, the
 following error message will appear every three minutes:

   [Feb 13 19:18:22] WARNING[14171]: chan_sip.c:12621 handle_response:
Remote host can't match request NOTIFY to call
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Giving up.

 The IP address belongs to my server. At the same time, I used tcpdump
 to see what else might be going on. I found the following:

   19:18:22.540113 IP bitis.umrk.to.sip  gigaset.umrk.to.sip: SIP, length: 
 545
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .)..NOTIFY sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
   Via: SIP/2.0
   19:18:22.571452 IP gigaset.umrk.to.sip  bitis.umrk.to.sip: SIP, length: 
 308
   E..P...f...
   .a_SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
   Via:

 The latest comment on the voip-info.org page above outlines the same
 problem. Can anyone here confirm that this is indeed a Siemens
 problem, or might it be an Asterisk problem after all?

 I'm running Asterisk v1.4.14 on a Debian etch server.

 Thanks,

 Jaap

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] GXP2000 and asterisk 1.0.9

2008-02-13 Thread Henry Devito
Is your phone actually registered to the switch.  go to the CLI and do a 
'sip show peers'  see if extension 502 is registered.  Making an outbound 
call does not prove that the phone is registered.


- Original Message - 
From: C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] GXP2000 and asterisk 1.0.9


 Just check DND if it's on on the phone or not.
 What is the CLI output when you try making a phone call?
 Why don't you try it with a later version of astrisk and a Phone?

 On Feb 13, 2008 10:58 AM, Giordano Grandis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi all gusy,
 i have a big problem with gxp2000 and asterisk 1.0.9 The phones after a 
 few
 go in busy state, if you call it get the busy tone but the phone can 
 male
 any type of call.
 This is my sip.conf

 [502]
 language = it
 username = 502
 secret = password
 host = dynamic
 type = friend
 context = local
 canreinvite = yes
 dtmfmode = info
 callgroup = 1
 pickupgroup = 1
 callerid = 502 502

 Under Grandstream's support suggest, I set Use randmom port to yes and
 Nat traversal (STUN) to No, but send keep alive but without success.
 This is the firmware version: Program-- 1.1.5.15Bootloader-- 1.1.5.6

 Anyone can help me ?

 Thanks in advance

 Giordano


 No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.4/1275 - Release Date: 
 12/02/2008
 15.20

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Manager and Visual Basic

2008-02-13 Thread Razza
On 13/02/2008, Bill Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Has anyone tried to used VB6 to communicate with the Asterisk Manager?

 If so, would you be willing to share some basic code showing your
 approach to getting connected and parsing results?
 Bill

I wrote some very very basic stuff ages ago using standard
mswinsck.ocx, will dig it out.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] urgent-channels

2008-02-13 Thread Ben Willcox
Khaled Chehab wrote:
 Hi All
 
 
 
 I am using asterisk 1.2.4
 
 
 
 Please see the results when I execute Sip show channels
 
 *569 *active SIP channels

What phones are you using? We had a similar problem with Snom 360 phones
with firmware version  6.2.2 and asterisk 1.2, whereby channels would
not hangup correctly.

Cheers,
Ben


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] UK issue - Asterisk dialling 999... sort of

2008-02-13 Thread Razza
When I first set up asterisk, I had similar, fortunately not with the old
bill!
It basically boiled down to not enough delay between seizing the line and
dialing the digits, for example the following would have dialled the coppers
012*99 9*12345, as 012 would have been missed.
I'm guessing this isn't whats happening to you, if all your other calls are
uworking fine, but did bring back some memories and made me smile :o)
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and fax

2008-02-13 Thread stoffell
 I need to setup asterisk to send and receibe fax. I just looking about
 SpanDSP, Hylafax/Iaxmodem, AsterFax,...etc.
 The asterisk box has Digium hardware, one TE420B and one TDM2402 (8 FXO
 ports).

We use (at multiple sites, mostly BRI) iaxmodem and hylafax. Extra
bonus: you get all the cool features and possibilities of hylafax! ;-)

cheers,
stoffell

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] [Linux/Python 2.4.2] Forking Python doesn't work

2008-02-13 Thread Vincent
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:25:52 +0100, Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want it to detach the program from it's parent you
need the double fork yes.

Thanks for the confirmation, but when doing this, the NetCID
application no longer pops up, regardless of whether I put the NetCID
code in the second parent or second child:


exten = 9300,1,AGI(/tmp/test5.py|${CALLERID(num)}|${CALLERID(name)})
exten = 9300,n,Dial(${MYPHONE},15)

# cat test5.py 

#!/usr/bin/python
import socket,sys,time,os

def sendstuff(data):
   s.sendto(data,(ipaddr,portnum))
   return

log = open('/tmp/output.txt','w')

sys.stdout = open(os.devnull, 'w')
if os.fork():
#Parent
log.write(Step 1\n)
log.close()
os._exit(0)
else:
#Child
os.chdir('/tmp')
os.setsid()
os.umask(0)

if os.fork():
#Parent
log.write(Step 2\n)
log.close()

now = time.localtime(time.time())
dateandtime = time.strftime(%d/%m/%Y %H:%M, now)

myarray = []
myarray.append(STAT Rings: 1)
myarray.append(RING)
myarray.append(NAME  + cidname)
myarray.append(TTSN Call from  + cidname)
myarray.append(NMBR  + cidnum)
myarray.append(TYPE K)

s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET,socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
 s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET,socket.SO_BROADCAST,True)

portnum = 42685
ipaddr = 192.168.0.255

for i in myarray:
sendstuff(i)

time.sleep(5)
sendstuff(IDLE  + dateandtime)
os._exit(0)
else:
#Child
log.write(Step 3\n)
log.close()
os._exit(0)


Has someone already forked a Python script successfully from Asterisk
through AGI?

Thanks.


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime SIP peers - reloading cached info

2008-02-13 Thread Rob Hillis
Johansson Olle E wrote:
 So please rememner that there are a few independent regular Asterisk  
 developers out there that is not on the Digium payroll and still take  
 part in  decisions about Asterisk.
   

Point taken. 

 Over a year is a long time for a warning like this, considering that  
 1.6 won't be out for a while (we're in beta test cycle) it might even  
 be 1.5 year warning. That should be more than enough for most people -  
 I hope. Considering that people don't upgrade quickly, it will  
 propably be more than that for most users (as you are still on 1.2 :-) )
   

You could be right there - though my main concern is that since I'm
developing for /mostly/ 1.2 systems at this stage, I can't use the new
syntax since (as far as I can tell) the ${REALTIME} function isn't
available in 1.2.  If it were, I'd convert my scripts /now/.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] MWI problem with Siemens Gigaset S675 IP

2008-02-13 Thread Jaap Winius
Quoting Henry Devito [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Try adding [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (or what ever your voicemail
 contexxt is) I've had to add the voicemail context to get MWI
 to work correctly in the past.

According to the documentation, you shouldn't have to add @context  
if the context is 'default'. But, I went ahead and tried it out  
anyway. I even tried using some other context names, but it makes no  
difference: the error remains the same.

Thanks anyway,

Jaap


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] SIP over TCP

2008-02-13 Thread Razza
I am aware there is a SIP over TCP patch. Will this ever become part of
a release, if so are there any timelines?
Thanks in advance.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] multiple host in 1 context on sip.conf

2008-02-13 Thread Mark Quitoriano
Is it possilble for a single context to have multiple host= something like
this

[carrier]
host=ip address1
host=ip address2
host=ip address3
type=peer
disallow=all
allow=g729
allow=ulaw
canreinvite=no
insecure=yes
qualify=yes

-- 
Regards,
Mark Quitoriano
http://asterisk.org.ph

Fan the flame...
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=user/registerr=19441
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP over TCP

2008-02-13 Thread Joe Pukepail
Looks like it is part of the 1.6 Beta.

From the Change Log:

2008-01-18 22:04 + [r99080-99085]  Russell Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* CREDITS, include/asterisk/http.h, main/tcptls.c (added),
  main/manager.c, channels/chan_sip.c, doc/siptls.txt (added),
  main/Makefile, main/http.c, include/asterisk/tcptls.h (added),
  configs/sip.conf.sample, CHANGES: Merge changes from
  team/group/sip-tcptls This set of changes introduces TCP and TLS
  support for chan_sip. There are various new options in
  configs/sip.conf.sample that are used to enable these features.
  Also, there is a document, doc/siptls.txt that describes some
  things in more detail. This code was implemented by Brett Bryant
  and James Golovich. It was reviewed by Joshua Colp and myself. A
  number of other people participated in the testing of this code,
  but since it was done outside of the bug tracker, I do not have
  their names. If you were one of them, thanks a lot for the help!
  (closes issue #4903, but with completely different code that what
  exists there.)


On Feb 13, 2008 4:21 PM, Razza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am aware there is a SIP over TCP patch. Will this ever become part of
 a release, if so are there any timelines?
 Thanks in advance.

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] PCI32 and PCI-X compatibility

2008-02-13 Thread Michael Spiceland

 Marco,
 
 You should not have any issues using a PCI card in a PCI-X slot, as
 long as the card is a 3.3V PCI card.  The cards that you mention above
 are 3.3v compatible and you should be able to use them.
 
 All of Digium's product line is available for 3.3v slots.  Most are
 universal and can be used in 3.3v or 5v slots.  The only exceptions
 are the dual and quad span T1/E1 digital cards.  For those cards,
 there are 3.3v variants (TE410P and TE210P) and 5v variants (TE405P
 and TE410P).

Oops, I meant that the 5v variants are the TE405P and *TE205P*.

3.3v - TE410P and TE210P
5v   - TE405P and TE205P

Michael

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SIP over TCP

2008-02-13 Thread Raj Jain
SIP over TCP is included in 1.6.
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/tags/1.6.0-beta1/CHANGES?view=co


On Feb 13, 2008 5:21 PM, Razza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am aware there is a SIP over TCP patch. Will this ever become part of a
 release, if so are there any timelines?
 Thanks in advance.
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




-- 
Raj Jain

mailto:rj2807 at gmail dot com
sip:rjain at iptel dot org

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] message: !! Got Busy in Connected State !?!

2008-02-13 Thread Fons van der Beek

What phone do you use?
Linksys ?

Vieri schreef:

--- Fons van der Beek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

  

Hello all,
 I am using asterisk 1.4.17 together with misdn, 
once in a while:


-when a call was put on hold
-the operator tries to call a internal party for
transfering the call
-the internal party doesn't answer the phone
-the operator wants to get the external line backup
again by putting the 
call off hold

And then the external line is disconnected.



I get the same with Asterisk 1.2 and chan_misdn.

Is this a known bug or something I misconfigured? In
the latter case, what should I look for?

Thanks,
Vieri



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Attendant phone

2008-02-13 Thread Rob Hillis
As far as I'm aware, only the Aastra 57i with three 560M modules would 
come close to your requirements.

The 57i can display up to 5 extensions at one time with a further 15 
being available by the use of multiple pages.  The 560M modules can 
display up to 20 extensions at one time with three pages being available 
for a total of 60 extensions per phone.

This gives you a total of 200 extensions that can be monitored.

voip crazy wrote:
 Dear list,

 I need to buy a phone which could monitor the state of the maximun 
 number of sip extensions about 200. It is for an attendant. I just saw 
 Snom 370 with keypad and Linksys 962 but they do not let me to monitor 
 200 extensions states adding keypads.

 Do you know any kind of phone that let me do that?
 Which is the maximun number of extensions your phones can monitor and 
 which models phones are?


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Touch monitor file name format

2008-02-13 Thread Jaap Winius
Hi list,

The default file name format for touch monitor (automon) recordings is:

auto-${EPOCH}-caller-calee

It's possible to use the ${TOUCH_MONITOR} variable to change the  
'caller-calee' part, but what about the 'auto-${EPOCH}-' part?

I've been trying to use ${MONITOR_EXEC_ARGS} to add some more commands  
after the somix sequence for mp3 conversion. This should work, but  
I've so far failed to produce any mp3 files because I'm not able to  
predict the above epoch number. If I could alter 'auto-${EPOCH}-', or  
if it was stored in a variable I could use, then I'm sure my plan will  
succeed.

Any ideas?

Thanks,

Jaap


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Attendant phone

2008-02-13 Thread Klaverstyn, David C
To me it sounds like you should be using the Flash Operator Panel to
monitor that many extensions.  The Polycom 6xx range can monitor 42
extensions.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hillis
Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2008 10:32 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Attendant phone

As far as I'm aware, only the Aastra 57i with three 560M modules would 
come close to your requirements.

The 57i can display up to 5 extensions at one time with a further 15 
being available by the use of multiple pages.  The 560M modules can 
display up to 20 extensions at one time with three pages being available

for a total of 60 extensions per phone.

This gives you a total of 200 extensions that can be monitored.

voip crazy wrote:
 Dear list,

 I need to buy a phone which could monitor the state of the maximun 
 number of sip extensions about 200. It is for an attendant. I just saw

 Snom 370 with keypad and Linksys 962 but they do not let me to monitor

 200 extensions states adding keypads.

 Do you know any kind of phone that let me do that?
 Which is the maximun number of extensions your phones can monitor and 
 which models phones are?


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] [Linux/Python 2.4.2] Forking Python doesn't work

2008-02-13 Thread Russell Bryant
Vincent wrote:
 On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:59:38 -0200, Diego Aguirre
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 try to use System() instead of AGI()
 
 Thanks, but no go. I get an error:
 
 [Feb 13 21:57:55] WARNING[2138]: app_system.c:107 system_exec_helper:
 Unable to execute '/tmp/netcid.py|2000|Joe'

The arguments to System() are a bit different.  Put it in just like you would 
type at the command line.

System(/tmp/netcid.py 2000 Joe)

-- 
Russell Bryant
Senior Software Engineer
Open Source Team Lead
Digium, Inc.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Manager and Visual Basic

2008-02-13 Thread Grey Man

- Original Message 

 From: Bill Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

 Sent: Wednesday, 13 February, 2008 8:31:01 PM

 Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Manager and Visual Basic



 Has anyone tried to used VB6 to communicate with the Asterisk Manager?

 If so, would you be willing to share some basic code showing your
 approach to getting connected and parsing results?

 I've got a Telnet control that is allowing me to connect, authenticate
 and see the flow of status, etc., but I'm sure there is a better way
 to do this without using Telnet (maybe not?).  Any suggestions?



Hi Bill,

I don't know if it would be of any use to you but we have some C# code that 
handles the basics of communicating the the Asterisk Manager Interface. It 
doesn't do anything fancy just sends single commands and checks the responses. 
We don't use it for monitoring.

Regards,

Greyman.






  Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.
www.yahoo7.com.au/y7mail



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >