[ATrpms-users] Trouble updating. Unresolvable requirements.

2007-09-10 Thread hondaman
For a few weeks now, I havent been able to update my box because of this: -- Processing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.1-41.fc7 for package: fuse-kmdl-2.6.22.1-41.fc7 -- Processing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.1-41.fc7 for package: ivtv-kmdl-2.6.22.1-41.fc7 -- Processing Dependency:

[ATrpms-users] Problems when updating to latest kernel under FC6

2007-09-10 Thread Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
I am having the following problems with updating FC6 to the latest kernel (2.6.22.4-45.fc6): 1. Missing kmdls: nvidia-graphics9631-kmdl lirc-kmdl 2. I also get the following dependency error under yum: Error: Missing Dependency: lirc-lib = 0.8.2 is needed by

[ATrpms-users] Linux and P35 / ICH9R chipset

2007-09-10 Thread Jean-Yves Avenard
Hi I'm looking at purchasing some new PCs using a Q6600 processor (quad-core) and a P35 based motherboard (Gigabyte) and with the ICH9R controller. It looks like there's is support for the P35 chipset (I've seen people reporting that Ubuntu ran fine on it) ; but I'm not sure with the stock

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics7185-1.0_7185-74.3.fc7 should have .so instead of .o?

2007-09-10 Thread David O'Shea
Hi Paulo, all, I removed the ATrpms nvidia RPMs and installed an equivalent set of livna RPMs (containing the 7185 release drivers) and these worked fine for me. I assume that this is because the livna RPM provides nvidia_drv.so instead of nvidia_drv.o. Regards, David - Original Message

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics7185-1.0_7185-74.3.fc7 should have .so instead of .o?

2007-09-10 Thread Paulo Cavalcanti
On 9/10/07, David O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Paulo, all, I removed the ATrpms nvidia RPMs and installed an equivalent set of livna RPMs (containing the 7185 release drivers) and these worked fine for me. I assume that this is because the livna RPM provides nvidia_drv.so instead of

Re: [ATrpms-users] Can't start x with nvidia-graphics7185 on Fedora 7

2007-09-10 Thread Marshall Crocker
john bray wrote: this seems to be a relatively common problem, and have a relatively simple solution. i just added bugzilla bug: http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1283 hopefully, it will document the problem. I don't think there's going to be an easy way to specify which cards

Re: [ATrpms-users] Problems when updating to latest kernel under FC6

2007-09-10 Thread Marshall Crocker
I don't think the nvidia-graphics9631-kmdl package is available anymore. Try nvidia-graphics9639. Different version for lirc, I think it's version 0.8.3something. Marshall Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: I am having the following problems with updating FC6 to the latest kernel

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics7185-1.0_7185-74.3.fc7 should have .so instead of .o?

2007-09-10 Thread Marshall Crocker
I was having the exact same problem with the 9639 driver. I created a link from nvidia_drv.so to nvidia-1.0-9639 and that did the trick for me. The atrpms packages may not have worked if you had any other nvidia packages other than nvidia-graphices7185* and the nvidia helper and devices

Re: [ATrpms-users] Trouble updating. Unresolvable requirements.

2007-09-10 Thread Marshall Crocker
This means that it can't install the kernel modules for kernel 2.6.22.1-41 because it is no longer available. Kernel 2.6.22.4-65 is what you want now. Update your kernel with yum update and then manually install each kmdl with yum install PACKAGE-kmdl-2.6.22.4-65 where of course PACKAGE is

Re: [ATrpms-users] nvidia-graphics7185-1.0_7185-74.3.fc7 should have .so instead of .o?

2007-09-10 Thread Paulo Cavalcanti
On 9/10/07, Paulo Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/10/07, David O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Paulo, all, I removed the ATrpms nvidia RPMs and installed an equivalent set of livna RPMs (containing the 7185 release drivers) and these worked fine for me. I assume that