Ettore Aldrovandi eald...@math.fsu.edu writes:
Hi Ettore,
Thanks. I'm using your patch now for a few days and see if it works
for me.
I have been following this, and wanted to try the patches on OS X.
After rebuilding auctex, they work well with a stock Emacs.app.
With Aquamacs.app,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:50:36AM +0200, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Do you have a backtrace, or in what way does it fail?
Looking at the patch, the only function in that procedure that was
touched is `TeX-command-query', but to me it looks unlikely to be the
Here's the trace on TeX-command-query
Ettore Aldrovandi eald...@math.fsu.edu writes:
Hi Ettore,
View command: (aquamacs-call-viewer 815 ringstacks.tex)
in the mini-buffer. Then it returns nil.
What view command do you get with the unpatched CVS version?
Bye,
Tassilo
___
auctex
On 7/25/2012 2:50 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Looking at the patch, the only function in that procedure that was
touched is `TeX-command-query', but to me it looks unlikely to be the
cause.
I agree that the changes to TeX-command-query look harmless. But
TeX-command-query calls TeX-check-files,
On 7/25/2012 4:07 PM, Philip Kime wrote:
It's a while since I did this but as I recall I did re-write TeX-check-files
quite a bit as it didn't deal with checking files which weren't open in Emacs
That's what I missed.
and also didn't test biber-specific files like the .bcf file.
Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:24:25PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
The patches won't apply. But you can just use Philip's files directly:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/biblatex-biber/files/auctex-biber.zip
Yes, that's what I have. Thanks,
--Ettore
--
Ettore Aldrovandi
Department of
Ken Brown kbr...@cornell.edu writes:
Hi Ken,
On 7/23/2012 6:50 AM, Philip Kime wrote:
The unified diff applies cleanly for me and seems to work fine on the
current CVS checkout.
Great. Thanks for testing.
I'm also running with your patch. I don't use Biber (yet), but at least
it doesn't
On 7/24/2012 3:12 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Hi Tassilo,
One difference between your and my patch is that with mine,
C-c [ tab
showed a completions buffer when being at the `reftex-citation' prompt.
With your patch, tab just says [No match].
This feature is in fact broken in the current
Ken Brown kbr...@cornell.edu writes:
Hi Ken,
This feature is in fact broken in the current (unpatched) CVS
version, but it works with Philip's version and my patch against CVS
trunk. It would be awesome if you could have a look at this.
Since this is broken in the current (unpatched) CVS
On 7/24/2012 1:30 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Hi Tassilo,
--8---cut here---start-8---
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
Just do C-x [ somewhere and you should be able to complete the keys
aucbrown12 and auchorn12.
\bibliographystyle{alpha}
On 7/24/2012 2:12 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/24/2012 1:30 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Hi Tassilo,
--8---cut here---start-8---
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
Just do C-x [ somewhere and you should be able to complete the keys
aucbrown12 and auchorn12.
Ken Brown kbr...@cornell.edu writes:
Completion works for me on this example, using CVS head with my
version of Philip's patches. It didn't work immediately when I first
entered the text into the buffer. But then I saved the file, killed
the buffer, and revisited the file, and completion
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:07:58AM +0200, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Thanks. I'm using your patch now for a few days and see if it works for
me.
Hello,
I have been following this, and wanted to try the patches on OS X.
After rebuilding auctex, they work well with a stock Emacs.app.
With
On 7/23/2012 6:50 AM, Philip Kime wrote:
The unified diff applies cleanly for me and seems to work fine on the current
CVS checkout.
Great. Thanks for testing.
Ken
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
Ken Brown kbr...@cornell.edu writes:
Many thanks for looking at this. It's hard to tell from the patches
if they are right - some people will have to install and test it. Can
I just pull this from the CVS head?
Just pull CVS head and apply the patches.
One thing to note is that many users
Ken Brown kbr...@cornell.edu writes:
I don't want to waste everyone's time, so I'll do a little testing
before sending my patches to the list.
My version works for me, so I'm attaching it in two forms; one is a
unified diff, which I find easier to read, and the other is in the
same format
On 7/21/2012 1:07 PM, Philip Kime wrote:
Many thanks for looking at this. It's hard to tell from the patches if they are
right - some people will have to install and test it. Can I just pull this from
the CVS head?
Just pull CVS head and apply the patches.
One thing to note is that many
Marcus Frings iam-est-hora-surg...@despammed.com writes:
So Biber users, could you please try applying the attached patch
against AUCTeX from CVS and check if the Biber stuff also works as
expected?
The patch file applied cleanly to my CVS version. At the moment I'm
working with it and
On 7/20/2012 5:42 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Marcus Frings iam-est-hora-surg...@despammed.com writes:
So Biber users, could you please try applying the attached patch
against AUCTeX from CVS and check if the Biber stuff also works as
expected?
The patch file applied cleanly to my CVS version.
19 matches
Mail list logo
