[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-11-28 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] Request for removal

2012-11-28 Thread Joeny Ang
Hi, On 11/26/2012 11:54 AM, Limao Luo wrote: Well [1] should be merged into [2], but yeah. Also, it would be good to provide links next time for the TU's convenience. Ok, thanks :) On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: Merged, thanks. Thanks :) Joeny

Re: [aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps

2012-11-28 Thread Stéphane Gaudreault
Le 2012-11-28 01:53, Allen Li a écrit : On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0500, Yichao Yu wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, 小龙 陈 chillermillerl...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Allen, I think the convention is to make two packages for software that support both Python 2 and 3. For example, in

[aur-general] Deletion request: some gedit packages

2012-11-28 Thread Jekyll Wu
All packages below are orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-docwordscompletion/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-macro-plugin/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-multi-edit-svn/ svn repo gone

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: some gedit packages

2012-11-28 Thread Felix Yan
On 11/28/2012 11:17 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote: All packages below are orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-docwordscompletion/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-macro-plugin/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-multi-edit-svn/ svn repo

[aur-general] Deletion request: some vala packages

2012-11-28 Thread Jekyll Wu
All packages below are orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valaswig/ fail to buid https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/va/valaswig-hg/ fail to build (after suppressing the sed error) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valabind/ fail to build

Re: [aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps

2012-11-28 Thread Allen Li
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:07:27AM -0500, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: If it is an application and does not provide a module that could be included in another application, then I suggest to depend on python3 only and keep the name flake8. Stéphane That sounds reasonable enough, but I think

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: some vala packages

2012-11-28 Thread Felix Yan
On 11/28/2012 11:52 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote: All packages below are orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valaswig/ fail to buid https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/va/valaswig-hg/ fail to build (after suppressing the sed error) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valabind/ fail to

Re: [aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps

2012-11-28 Thread Xyne
On 2012-11-28 21:36 -0500 Allen Li wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:07:27AM -0500, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: If it is an application and does not provide a module that could be included in another application, then I suggest to depend on python3 only and keep the name flake8. Stéphane

Re: [aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps

2012-11-28 Thread Xyne
Xyne wrote: Use flake8 (Python 3) and python2-flake8. If you cannot rename the installed files in python2-flake8 to avoid conflicts, add a conflict=(python8) to the PKGBUILD. Sorry, I'm tired. I meant conflicts=(flake8). Unless Guido starts hiring Firefox devs, we won't see python8 for a while.

Re: [aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps

2012-11-28 Thread Allen Li
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:58:28AM +, Xyne wrote: Use flake8 (Python 3) and python2-flake8. If you cannot rename the installed files in python2-flake8 to avoid conflicts, add a conflict=(python8) to the PKGBUILD. In general the python*- prefix is reserved for library packages, but its

Re: [aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps

2012-11-28 Thread Karol Woźniak
OK, I'm back for a moment, so, as a maintainer of flake8 package, I guess I should write something here (and hope gmail won't mess the nesting. I still don't know how it works here...). Coming to think about it, there IS a library in flake8. I mean, most people will just run the exec and be fine,

[aur-general] Removal request: cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base and cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib

2012-11-28 Thread Martin Schmölzer
Hi! I recently adopted and updated the following orphaned packages: - cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils - cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc - cross-arm-none-eabi-gdb Two packages from the cross-arm-none-eabi-* series remain as orphans in the AUR: - cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base -