On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Pham Bao Trung
pham.bao.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using ibus-unikey and have not tried fcitx. On ibus or scim, unikey is
better than m17n. Ready to move to fcitx if it is really better and can be
used for Vietnamese input.
Hi, I've packaged fcitx-unikey in
Thanks for all the insightful information!
If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people
also use ibus.
Rumor has it that someone is planning to sponsor a new TU in the near
future, where one of the
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200
Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people
also use ibus.
My gripe with fcitx is that it is poorly documented (in
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200
Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200
Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
For the gnome3.6 ibus-integration problem Felix Yan mentioned above,
the patch to split ibus into ibus and libibus is already tested and
can be found here[1].
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32071
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at
I have used ibus for Vietnamese input. The only other option is scim, but
ibus is far better, so please don't drop ibus.
Vietnamese fellows, raise your voices :)
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote:
For the gnome3.6 ibus-integration problem Felix Yan mentioned
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Pham Bao Trung
pham.bao.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used ibus for Vietnamese input. The only other option is scim, but
ibus is far better, so please don't drop ibus.
There are at least three components of fcitx supports Vietnamese:
fcitx-table-other(AUR),
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Pham Bao Trung
pham.bao.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used ibus for Vietnamese input. The only other option is scim, but
ibus is far better, so please don't drop ibus.
Btw, what's the input method you are using in ibus right now? Don't
really think ibus provides
I am using ibus-unikey and have not tried fcitx. On ibus or scim, unikey is
better than m17n. Ready to move to fcitx if it is really better and can be
used for Vietnamese input.
Anyway thanks guys!
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at
Hi,
Thanks for your attention to CJK input methods.
FWIK yangtsesu is currently a fcitx user and packager of openSUSE [1].
His packages are okay and updated regularly, but I'm afraid he doesn't
have enough time to maintain all ibus stuff too.
Besides, I would like to maintain fcitx stuff as I
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your attention to CJK input methods.
FWIK yangtsesu is currently a fcitx user and packager of openSUSE [1].
His packages are okay and updated regularly, but I'm afraid he doesn't
have enough time to
Hi,
I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
fcitx only does simplified Chinese (at least according to the wiki).
Thus ibus is one of the only input options for those languages on arch
at the moment (barring that other one whose name I'm having trouble
recalling at
On 17 October 2012 00:55, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
fcitx only does simplified Chinese (at least according to the wiki).
Thus ibus is one of the only input options for those languages on arch
at the moment
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
fcitx only does simplified Chinese (at least according to the wiki).
No, not true. There is fcitx-mozc[1][2], fcitx-anthy[3][4],
fcitx-m17n[5][6],
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 17 October 2012 00:55, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
fcitx only does simplified Chinese (at least according to the wiki).
Thus
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org
wrote:
On 17 October 2012 00:55, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to point out that ibus does Japanese and Korean, whereas
fcitx
On 17 October 2012 02:05, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org
wrote:
On 17 October 2012 00:55, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Masato Hashimoto
cabezon.hashim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:55:39 -0400
Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
so dropping it
is extremely unfavorable I think.
Just my two cents.
Allen Li
+1
AFAIK, ibus is default input method
19 matches
Mail list logo
